On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 04:44:07PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
For kfreebsd-amd64 the build on fasch just failed.
So as far as I can see it's built on all arches now, just not
signed on mips yet?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Joey Schulze j...@infodrom.org (15/01/2011):
we're missing a build of openoffice.org for testing-security for the
following architectures:
. armel
. mips
. kfreebsd-i386
. kfreebsd-amd64
Could you check if (a) your buildd is building
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:21:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Joey Schulze j...@infodrom.org (15/01/2011):
we're missing a build of openoffice.org for testing-security for the
following architectures:
. armel
. mips
. kfreebsd-i386
.
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:21:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Joey Schulze j...@infodrom.org (15/01/2011):
we're missing a build of openoffice.org for testing-security for the
following architectures:
. armel
. mips
. kfreebsd-i386
.
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:21:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Joey Schulze j...@infodrom.org (15/01/2011):
we're missing a build of openoffice.org for testing-security for the
following architectures:
. armel
. mips
. kfreebsd-i386
.
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:21:10PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:21:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Joey Schulze j...@infodrom.org (15/01/2011):
we're missing a build of openoffice.org for testing-security for the
following
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:21:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Joey Schulze j...@infodrom.org (15/01/2011):
we're missing a build of openoffice.org for testing-security for the
following architectures:
. armel
. mips
.
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:33:33PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
armel failed with:
openoffice.org_3.1.1-15+squeeze1.dsc: armel not in arch list or
does not match any arch wildcards: i386 powerpc mips mipsel s390
m68k amd64 ia64 ppc64 s390x sparc all -- skipping
Jupp,
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:48:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
OTOH armel and amd64 don't try to build the same version:
aurel32@grieg:~$ wb info openoffice.org . amd64 armel . testing-security |
grep Version
| Version : 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze1
| Installed-Version :
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:48:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
OTOH armel and amd64 don't try to build the same version:
aurel32@grieg:~$ wb info openoffice.org . amd64 armel . testing-security |
grep Version
|
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:48:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
OTOH armel and amd64 don't try to build the same version:
aurel32@grieg:~$ wb info openoffice.org . amd64 armel . testing-security
|
11 matches
Mail list logo