Re: Missing security build

2011-01-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 04:44:07PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: For kfreebsd-amd64 the build on fasch just failed. So as far as I can see it's built on all arches now, just not signed on mips yet? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wb-team-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: Missing security build

2011-01-15 Thread Martin Schulze
Cyril Brulebois wrote: Joey Schulze j...@infodrom.org (15/01/2011): we're missing a build of openoffice.org for testing-security for the following architectures: . armel . mips . kfreebsd-i386 . kfreebsd-amd64 Could you check if (a) your buildd is building

Re: Missing security build

2011-01-15 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:21:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: Cyril Brulebois wrote: Joey Schulze j...@infodrom.org (15/01/2011): we're missing a build of openoffice.org for testing-security for the following architectures: . armel . mips . kfreebsd-i386 .

Re: Missing security build

2011-01-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:21:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: Cyril Brulebois wrote: Joey Schulze j...@infodrom.org (15/01/2011): we're missing a build of openoffice.org for testing-security for the following architectures: . armel . mips . kfreebsd-i386 .

Re: Missing security build

2011-01-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:21:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: Cyril Brulebois wrote: Joey Schulze j...@infodrom.org (15/01/2011): we're missing a build of openoffice.org for testing-security for the following architectures: . armel . mips . kfreebsd-i386 .

Re: Missing security build

2011-01-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:21:10PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:21:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: Cyril Brulebois wrote: Joey Schulze j...@infodrom.org (15/01/2011): we're missing a build of openoffice.org for testing-security for the following

Re: Missing security build

2011-01-15 Thread Martin Schulze
Philipp Kern wrote: On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:21:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: Cyril Brulebois wrote: Joey Schulze j...@infodrom.org (15/01/2011): we're missing a build of openoffice.org for testing-security for the following architectures: . armel . mips .

Re: Missing security build

2011-01-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:33:33PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: Kurt Roeckx wrote: armel failed with: openoffice.org_3.1.1-15+squeeze1.dsc: armel not in arch list or does not match any arch wildcards: i386 powerpc mips mipsel s390 m68k amd64 ia64 ppc64 s390x sparc all -- skipping Jupp,

Re: Missing security build

2011-01-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:48:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: OTOH armel and amd64 don't try to build the same version: aurel32@grieg:~$ wb info openoffice.org . amd64 armel . testing-security | grep Version | Version : 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze1 | Installed-Version :

Re: Missing security build

2011-01-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:48:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: OTOH armel and amd64 don't try to build the same version: aurel32@grieg:~$ wb info openoffice.org . amd64 armel . testing-security | grep Version |

Re: Missing security build

2011-01-15 Thread Martin Schulze
Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:48:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: OTOH armel and amd64 don't try to build the same version: aurel32@grieg:~$ wb info openoffice.org . amd64 armel . testing-security |