Bug#100212: marked as done (ITA: chemtool)

2001-09-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2001 14:57:06 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#100212: fixed in chemtool 1.3.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#110776: marked as done (ITP: libapache-stage-perl -- Manage A Staging Directory)

2001-09-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2001 15:01:01 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#110776: fixed in libapache-stage-perl 1.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Re: Bug#111068: debbugs: per-package tags

2001-09-03 Thread Yann Dirson
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 07:43:47PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote: Per-package tags would be useful for some things. The one that triggered this idea is: outdatedNew version is available How does this have to be per-package tagging, just have a bug filed against each package that is

Bug#79667: twiki

2001-09-03 Thread RISKO Gergely
Hello! You don't have to release it, since this mail will appear in BTS. So we can say, that now I have got the right to package it. If you have other packages, which marked with ITP, but you want to release it, than you should retitle them with [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the retitle command to RFP:

Processed: ITPs are wishlist bugs

2001-09-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 111014 wishlist Bug#111014: ITP: gdkxft -- transparently adds anti-aliased font support to gtk Severity set to `wishlist'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator,