Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2001 14:57:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#100212: fixed in chemtool 1.3.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2001 15:01:01 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#110776: fixed in libapache-stage-perl 1.18-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 07:43:47PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
Per-package tags would be useful for some things. The one that
triggered this idea is:
outdatedNew version is available
How does this have to be per-package tagging, just have a bug filed against
each package that is
Hello!
You don't have to release it, since this mail will appear in BTS.
So we can say, that now I have got the right to package it.
If you have other packages, which marked with ITP, but you want to
release it, than you should retitle them with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the retitle command to RFP:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 111014 wishlist
Bug#111014: ITP: gdkxft -- transparently adds anti-aliased font support to gtk
Severity set to `wishlist'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator,
5 matches
Mail list logo