Bug#118461: marked as done (ITP: CSL - Common Sound Layer)

Your message dated 05 Dec 2001 00:53:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing #118421: ITP: csl - package uploaded has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#118421: marked as done (ITP: CSL - Common Sound Layer)

Your message dated 05 Dec 2001 00:53:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing #118421: ITP: csl - package uploaded has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: ITA: jboss: An Open-Source(LGPL) J2EE implementation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 122453 wnpp Bug#122453: ITA: jboss: An Open-Source(LGPL) J2EE implementation Bug reassigned from package `debbugs' to `wnpp'. > retitle 122453 ITP: jboss: An Open-Source(LGPL) J2EE implementation Bug#122453: ITA: jboss: An Open-Source(LGPL) J2

Bug#122242: marked as done (ITP: xletters -- Type falling words before they land)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2001 15:13:31 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#122242: fixed in xletters 1.1.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#121610: marked as done (ITP:cmake -- A cross-platform, open-source make system.)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2001 14:57:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#121610: fixed in cmake 0.96-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#121296: marked as done (ITP: ghemical -- A GNOME molecular modelling environment)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2001 15:01:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#121296: fixed in ghemical 0.81-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#121060: marked as done (ITP: libdbd-sybase -- Sybase database driver for the DBI module)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2001 15:05:40 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#121060: fixed in libdbd-sybase-perl 0.93-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#113965: marked as done (ITP: matrem -- An experiment in Artificial life)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2001 15:07:11 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#113965: fixed in matrem 1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#114103: marked as done (ITA: kdenetwork -- Network tools for KDE)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2001 15:04:00 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#114103: fixed in kdenetwork 4:2.2.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processed: Fixed in NMU of epic4-script-hienoa 0.47.1-2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 119956 + fixed Bug#119956: ITP: epic4-script-hienoa -- A script for ircII-EPIC4 Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs data

Bug#122187: marked as done (ITP: c-cpp-reference -- C/C++ Reference for KDevelop)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2001 14:56:43 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#122187: fixed in c-cpp-reference 2.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#97234: Debian Packaging of Subversion

Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 09:26:23PM + wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:59:14PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote: > > 1. Berkeley db 3.3 - a bug has been filed (http::/bugs.debian.org/109853) > > I have been building with the preliminary packages on > > people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/. > > db3 is p

Bug#116549: (no subject)

close 116549 reopen 116549 ! retitle 116549 ITA: xmmsarts -- aRts Output plugin for xmms thanks I'll have a new package ready in a couple of weeks. I have a sponsor and advocate and will apply for NM once I have some signatures on my GPG key. -- Chris Boyle - Winchester College - http://archive

Bug#108711: marked as done (ITP: kernel-module-2.4.5-qeth-s390 -- Kernel module containing the qeth driver for network devices on IBM's S/390)

Your message dated Tue, 4 Dec 2001 18:30:41 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Not packaging s390-OCO-modules has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 116549 Bug#116549: O: xmmsarts -- aRts Output plugin for xmms Bug closed, send any further explanations to Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > reopen 116549 ! Bug#116549: O: xmmsarts -- aRts Output plugin for xmms Bug reopened, originator set

Bug#108709: marked as done (ITP: kernel-module-2.4.5-lcs-s390 -- Kernel module containing the LCS driver for network devices on IBM's S/390)

Your message dated Tue, 4 Dec 2001 18:26:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Not packaging s390-OCO-modules has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#108710: marked as done (ITP: kernel-module-2.4.5-qdio-s390 -- Kernel module containing the QDIO base support driver)

Your message dated Tue, 4 Dec 2001 18:27:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Not packaging s390-OCO-modules has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#109961: reassignment

Hi since Mark just got a shiny new Apple Cube without a TV card and cannot continue the work and has not enough time I will take over. Preview releases are at deb http://arachni.kiwi.uni-hamburg.de/~harlekin/ binary-i386/ Max

Bug#80147: ITP: gsmssend -- GNOME/GTK user interface for SmsSend

Followup-For: Bug #80147 Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-05 I have already finished packaging gsmssend_1.7 for Debian GNU/Linux for my new mainter's application. This package depends upon skyutils1 and skyutils-dev (1.15 for both) which was pending distribution on

Bug#122393: RFP: omni -- 300+ printer drivers using ghostscript engine

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Omni is licensed under the LGPL. It his a printer driver model being developed by IBM. Home page is here: http://oss.software.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/projects/omni/ Soureforge project is here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/omniprint/ Tarballs

Bug#122387: ITP: apt-show-versions - Lists availlable package versions with

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist apt-show-versions parses the dpkg status file and the APT lists for the installed and availlable package versions and distribution and shows upgrade options within the specific distribution of the selected package. This is really

Bug#122373: ITP: ruby-eserver - Generic multi-threaded e-service server in Ruby

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: ruby-eserver Homepage: http://fairfax2.laser.net/~jsmall/rubycorner.html Description: A generic, multi-threaded e-service server in Ruby. Includes a simplistic HttpEchoServer.rb to demonstrate how to write your own server. License: Rub