Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
These files are used by the example code in the vtk-examples
package. The Visualization Toolkit has many useful features, and this
data is used to create spectacular 3-D visualizations.
Having this data easily available to those learning to use VTK is also
part
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
URL: http://oss.software.ibm.com/acpmodem/
License: GPL
Description: Mwave/ACP modem support
The mwavem program implements a Hayes-compatible V.90 modem
in the 3780i Mwave/ACP DSP chip which is built in to certain
IBM ThinkPad laptop computers, including the
Thomas wrote:
> Where are you proposing we place that hyperlink?
I just recieved word that the program appears to be a non-graphical one
and as such, the placement of the hyperlink is indeed a problem, the
burden of solving which I'd prefer to place on the copyright holder.
Conclusively, an inq
"Sunnanvind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The license require no such thing.
> What it does require is that the image is displayed, hyperlinked (i.e.
> placed within hyperlink tags) to the specific page.
Where are you proposing we place that hyperlink?
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-16
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: camstream
Version : 0.25
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.smcc.demon.nl/camstream/
* License : GPL
Description : camstream - collection of tools for we
Thomas wrote:
> The non-free archive contains hyperlinks, and the license requires
> that those hyperlinks include the image.
The license require no such thing.
What it does require is that the image is displayed, hyperlinked (i.e.
placed within hyperlink tags) to the specific page.
It's a very
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:17:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#122373: fixed in ruby-eserver 0.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:22:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#116546: fixed in xtron 1.1a-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:16:35 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#123493: fixed in pth 1.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:13:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#123146: fixed in mah-jong 1.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:15:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#110802: fixed in openjade 1.4devel1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:52:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#123488: fixed in libmcrypt 2.4.18-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:12:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#123424: fixed in lodju 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:52:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#123481: fixed in mcrypt 2.5.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:03:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#122715: fixed in cvsps 1.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:02:42 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#122108: fixed in crank 0.1.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:02:29 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#121648: fixed in crack-attack 1.1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
"Sunnanvind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My own interpretation is that it can be distributed in the non-free
> archive. It fails DFSG 3 by not allowing removal of the hyperlink; but as
> long as the hyperlink is there, I don't see any problem for non-free.
The non-free archive contains hyperl
> You're right, but it still seems to prohibit any kind of distribution
> which is not by hyperlinks that include their logo.
I agree that it doesn't make any actual difference with regard to
freeness; I was just refuting Brandens insinuation of ignorance on behalf
of the license writer.
> Tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 120070 + fixed
Bug#120070: ITP: cuyo -- Tetris-like game with very impressive effects
Bug#117512: ITP: cuyo -- Tetris-like game with many suprises
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:05:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#122252: fixed in emacs-wiki 2.29-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:05:25 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#121873: fixed in ezmlm-browse 0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:12:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#123410: fixed in librtf-document-perl 0.64-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:11:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#123403: fixed in libconvert-units-perl 0.43-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:07:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#95119: fixed in greg 1.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 20011216T112830-0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Um, no, TeX has a perfectly clear license.
>
> Would you please give a reference to it?
>From tex.web:
% This program is copyright (C) 1982 by D. E. Knuth; all rights are reserved.
% Co
On 20011216T112830-0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Um, no, TeX has a perfectly clear license.
Would you please give a reference to it?
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, LuK (BSc)* http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ * [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
tutkimusavustaja / research assistant
Jyväskylän yliopisto, tietotek
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 20011215T235408-0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > (The canonical example here is TeX
> > which has such a restriction.)
>
> TeX is already a special case as it really does not have a clear
> license, but everyone still treats it as free
"Sunnanvind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Re-read. It says "image should be inside the hyperlink", not the other
> way around.
You're right, but it still seems to prohibit any kind of distribution
which is not by hyperlinks that include their logo. That's not
trademark protection, it's rather
I just noticed this while scanning debian-devel. This library looks
interesting, but I think your package description is pretty opaque.
It tells me very little about how I might use it. I think something
along the lines of the blurb at http://untroubled.org/cvm/cvm.html
would be better.
Andrew
> > > # Also, the official Wpoison logo itself must be include in an
> HTML
> > > # hyperlink so that any usser clicking on any part of the logo
> image
> > > # will be directed/linked to the Wpoison home page at:
> >
> > Please keep CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden wrote:
> The lic
Package: WNPP
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libcrypt-gpg-perl
Version : 1.27
Upstream Author : Ashish Gulhati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/AGUL
* License : Perl ( GPL / Artistic )
Description : An Object Oriented Interfa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 123481 ITA: mcrypt -- Replacement for old unix crypt(1)
Bug#123481: O: mcrypt -- Replacement for old unix crypt(1)
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 123488 ITA: libmcrypt -- De-/Encryption Library
Bug#123488: O: libmcrypt -- De-/Encryption Library
C
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
This package has been orphaned. If you want to be the new maintainer,
please take it -- retitle this bug from 'O:' to 'ITA:', fix the
outstanding bugs and upload a new version with your name in the
Maintainer: field and a
* New maintainer (Closes: #thisbug)
in
On 20011215T235408-0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> (The canonical example here is TeX
> which has such a restriction.)
TeX is already a special case as it really does not have a clear
license, but everyone still treats it as free software.
(This was the case at least when I last looked at it,
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This license fails DFSG 3 and I would recommend to the author that he
> use the right tool for the job. If he wants trademark protection in the
> Wpoison logo, he should apply for it. Of course, any party that
> attempts to use laws other than copyr
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-16
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnome-spell
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Radek Doulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/unstable/sources/gnome-spell/
* License : GPL
Description
37 matches
Mail list logo