Sorry for a confusing example. I tried
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug,nostrip" && debuild
and it didn't work. I did some RTFM and found in debuild(1):
> ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES
>As environment variables can affect the building of a
>package, often unintentionally, debuild san
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-01-22
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: asmutils
Version : 0.15
Upstream Author : various
* URL : http://www.linuxassembly.org/asmutils.html
* License : GPL
Description : set of very small UNIX-like utilities writ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 111746 ITP: cadaverserver -- A.I. realtime combat simulation
Bug#111746: RFP: cadaverserver -- A.I realtime combat simulation
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 111747 ITP: cadaverspyboss -- QT client to view cadavergames in
> `boss' mode
Bug#111747
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 129651 + fixed
Bug#129651: ITP: sdcc -- Small Device C Compiler
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 129763 + fixed
Bug#129763: ITP: file-roller -- an Archiver for GNOME
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 129110 + fixed
Bug#129110: libgnome-vfs0: Nautilus has the ability to view smb shares via
gnome-vfs, however it needs the gnome-vfs-extra modules to do this. Would it
be possible to have a libgnome-vfs0-extras deb and then recompile nautilus to
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:02:32PM +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:52:18PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> > I just checked the latest mozilla-cvs source package (dated 20020113)
> > and that file was still under the MPL. What's worse, the version in the
> > flash p
Please read again my previous mail before doing reply again.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on "Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:39:02 +0900",
with "Re: Bug#89433: I want to adopt osh",
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > # to compile with
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> # Note: you can't do it by
> # DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug,nostrip" && debuild
> # because it won't work. Shell variables are not
> # succeeded to sub-process.
>
> But it seems to me that you repeated to say the same thing
> in his co
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2002 02:59:12 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:52:18PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:35:07PM +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
>
> > This one is still MPL, probably because they have to ask one contributor.
> > Maybe it is already resolved.
> >
> > ./mozilla/modules/plugin/samples/default/uni
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:35:07PM +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> This one is still MPL, probably because they have to ask one contributor.
> Maybe it is already resolved.
>
> ./mozilla/modules/plugin/samples/default/unix/npunix.c
>
> I suggest checking the latest mozilla source and ask when th
Any interest in this?
What dependencies does jboss have?
What build dependencies does it have?
John Leuner
-
This message was sent using M-Web Airmail.
http://airmail.mweb.co.za/
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2002 02:49:25 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line duplicate
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> # to compile with debugging information:
> # $ debuild -e DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug,nostrip"
> #
> # Note: you can't do it by
> # DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug,nostrip" && debuild
> # because it won't work. Shell variables are not
> #
Hi, all.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on Sat, 19 Jan 2002 10:45:41 +0900,
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > debuild -e DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug,nostrip"
> >
> > and it worked. I can't see why this is syntactically incorrect.
>
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-01-22
Severity: normal
There are a number of outstanding bugs against fttools, several are over a year
old, and two concern programs segfaulting every time they're run. I mailed the
maintainer several months ago to ask whether he/she was still maintaining
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 130265 ITA: aspell-es -- Spanish dictionary for aspell
Bug#130265: RFA: aspell-es -- Spanish dictionary for aspell
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 22:17:17 +0900 (JST),
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I changed the package name because soname is the right thing.
Sorry, this will break snake4. I have already fixed it.
http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/debian-unofficial/shhmsg_1.3.4.orig.tar.gz
http://www.inter
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> I want to adopt shhmsg (#118143), but I am not a Debian developer,
> so I can't change the title of the wnpp bug until I find a sponsor.
> If you are interested, please sponsor me.
>
> I changed the package name because soname is the right
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 22:17:17 +0900 (JST),
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My .deb of grandfatherclock is available at:
s/grandfatherclock/shhmsg/
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/ooha
I want to adopt shhmsg (#118143), but I am not a Debian developer,
so I can't change the title of the wnpp bug until I find a sponsor.
If you are interested, please sponsor me.
I changed the package name because soname is the right thing.
My .deb of grandfatherclock is available at:
http://www.int
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 05:52:59AM +0800, Shell, Hin-lik Hung wrote:
> I can see libcrypt-gpg-perl currently in ITP, are you going
> to create the Debian package for it, or it is already created
> just for waiting someone to upload it ?
I did not ITP that package, I only changed the bug t
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:55:23 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#129930: Acknowledgement (ITP: sxm -- scheme implementation)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 124205 + pending
Bug#124205: ITP: libcrypt-gpg-perl -- An Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
tags 124205 + pending
thanks
libcrypt-gpg-perl was uploaded five weeks ago (to the day).
If you would like a copy of the package before it does go into the archive,
have a look at http://incoming.debian.org/
My apologies that it hasn't reached the archives yet.
My apologies, when I issued my ITP I was not aware of your previous ITP.
I understand that your ITP has been open 200 days without resolution.
If you would like to take this package, please do.
Otherwise, I have a package currently in incoming.
27 matches
Mail list logo
