Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2002 02:00:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#145232: fixed in xbindkeys 1.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2002 02:03:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#145305: fixed in xbindkeys-config 0.1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-01
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bluez-utils
Version : 2.0pre9
Upstream Author : Maxim Krasnyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://bluez.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Utilities for controlling Bl
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-01
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libbluetooth
Version : 2.0pre9
Upstream Author : Maxim Krasnyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://bluez.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Library to use the BlueZ Li
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 114105
Bug#114105: RFA: aktion -- A KDE frontend to xanim
Bug closed, send any further explanations to "Ivan E. Moore II" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
> close 142505
Bug#142505: ITP: liblog-agent-logger-perl -- Application-level logging
interface framew
On Wed, 01 May 2002 11:38:35 +0100
Edd Dumbill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The library in this package allows programs to be written that
> communicate with Bluetooth devices attached to a Linux system.
> The upstream tarball is actually named bluez-libs.
>
> Prototype packages are available at
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 13:39, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> The source package does not need to be renamed to libbluetooth.
> the source package can still be called "bluez-libs", as upstream calls it,
> while the binary packages be called libbluetooth
Thanks for pointing this out. That makes sense.
>
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 06:27:14AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > Are you still packaging sapdb? If not, I have just received my CD and
> > will start work on this right away (I have a project that needs it).
> he problem is that the build system is not yet free, so i cant build from
> source
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 12:47 AM, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This is not a contest. If you thought these were so totally
different, why did yo close the bug? evidently, you knew that you
were hijacking an ITP, and wanted a fait accompli.
Because the old ITP seemed irrelevant. Co
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 05:51:42AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I'm willing to try taking a swing at writing a build system for it.
> Do you mind if I do that, or would you prefer to keep this package for
> yourself?
You can take the package, but writing it for your self will not work. It
includes
My apologies for rushing the PPR info off half-baked (first two tries
didn't work at all). Here's the remaining info:
* Package name: ppr
Version : 1.44
Upstream Author : David Chappell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://http://ppr.trincoll.edu/
* License : BS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to help by packaging asmutils =)
- --
Magnus Ekdahl 0739-287181 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
public key available at http://oxtan.campus.luth.se/magnus.public
Key fingerprint = 18DE CB62 8A86 374E 824E 09ED 1987 4B18 1213 79F6
---
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-01
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: wmnetscapekiller
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : BLU-MOCAER Pierre-Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.some.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Dockapp for killing
I (together with my sponsor) intend to upload this packages in nearly 1 hour.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
I intend to package up the 2000 information from the US Census. This should
*not* replace the dict-gazetteer package with 1990 information, as the
Census Dept. is providing different information. Additionally, the
differences between the two data sets
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I currently do not have the bandwidth to properly maintain my packages.
There are several bugs which need to be address, as well as updating to
latest policy. Upstream no longer updates this package.
pgppk8sCthojQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I currently do not have the bandwidth to properly maintain my packages.
There are no open bugs.
pgp7oRBwX5yPS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I currently do not have the time to maintain this package. There are no bugs.
Please note that this is a source package which produces netspades-gtk,
netspades-slang, and netspades-server.
pgphLJKE555u6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
>>"John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Monday, April 29, 2002, at 09:49 AM, Cosimo Alfarano wrote:
>> Why you packaged it ignoring my ITP?
>> Why you are telling me it *NOW*, after upload?
John> Because your ITP was filed 4 months ago for only 4 packages. I
John> pac
19 matches
Mail list logo
