Bug#150761: ITP: moin -- Python clone of WikiWiki

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-06-23 Severity: wishlist * Package name: moin Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Jürgen Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://purl.net/wiki/moin/ * License : GPL Description : Python clone of WikiWiki A WikiWik

Bug#150759: ITP: sopwith --

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: sopwith Version : 1.3.0 Upstream Author : Simon Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://fraggle.despayre.org:81/stuffage/sopwith/download.shtml * License : GPL2/Sopwith license Description : a flying gam

Bug#129723: I am half-through packaging SQL-ledger...

Hi, I thought I had done an ITP for this one long ago, but obviously not... I have done some work on packaging already, so if you you don't mind I'd like to take over packaging it. If you insist then tell me, and I can pass you the work I have done so far. Happy hacking! - Jonas -- Jonas Sm

Processed: WNPP cleanup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 68406 Bug#68406: RFP: InterBase -- Borland open-sourced RDBMS Bug#83098: ITP: Firebird -- Open Source RDBMS Bug closed, send any further explanations to Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > retitle 76207 RFA: libv1.27 -- C++ GUI Framework Bug#

Bug#150551: ITP: wmcoincoin -- Stupid dockapp for browsing DaCode sites news and board

Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Romain FRANCOISE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Why do you think it has such a small audience ? WMcoincoin is already >> > used by 10-15 % of the linuxfr.org regular users, which has nothing to >> > do with the 30 users of your estimations. >> >> It

Bug#150551: ITP: wmcoincoin -- Stupid dockapp for browsing DaCode sites news and board

Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 07:46:35AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > And this has what exactly to do with wmcoincoin though? We're talking > about a self-described "stupid" dockapp whose primary feature seems to be > the added convenience of one-clic

Bug#150562: marked as done (ITP: info2man -- Convert GNU info files to POD or man pages)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jun 2002 01:46:28 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#150562: fixed in info2man 1.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#149026: marked as done (ITP: lurker -- web archive for mailing lists)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jun 2002 01:51:21 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#149026: fixed in lurker 0.1a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#146030: marked as done (ITP: kernel-patch-2.4-rmap -- Reverse mapping VM for Linux)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jun 2002 01:37:59 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#146030: fixed in kernel-patch-2.4-rmap 0.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#79553: marked as done (RFP: gmessage -- an xmessage clone for gtk+)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jun 2002 01:11:38 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#79553: fixed in gmessage 1.0.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#150455: marked as done (ITP: slides -- Make Slides Using Python)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jun 2002 01:29:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#150455: fixed in slides 1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#150241: marked as done (ITP: tcc -- Tiny C Compiler - The Smallest ANSI C compiler)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jun 2002 01:24:23 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#150241: fixed in tcc 0.9.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#150218: marked as done (ITP: dansguardian -- True web content filtering)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jun 2002 01:09:55 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#150218: fixed in dansguardian 2.2.10-0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#144100: marked as done (ITP: keepalived -- LVS monitor for virtual servers; notification and failover)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jun 2002 01:16:54 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#144100: fixed in keepalived 0.6.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#144707: marked as done (ITP: ocamlsdl -- OCaml bindings for SDL)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jun 2002 01:00:23 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#144707: fixed in ocamlsdl 0.5.0+cvs.20020616-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#123516: marked as done (ITA: xmp -- A module player supporting AWE32, GUS, and software-mixing)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jun 2002 00:45:48 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#123516: fixed in xmp 2.0.4d-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your