Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 157221 ITP: freeciv-sound-standard -- Standard sound pack for Freeciv
Bug#157221: freeciv-gtk: No sounds?
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 157221 wnpp
Bug#157221: ITP: freeciv-sound-standard -- Standard sound pack for Freeciv
Bug reassigned from p
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-26
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: qvocab
Version : 0.22.4
Upstream Authors: Joachim Wieland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Thomas Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://qvocab.seu
retitle 157221 ITP: freeciv-sound-standard -- Standard sound pack for Freeciv
reassign 157221 wnpp
severity 157221 wishlist
thanks
This is the standard sound pack for Freeciv. It provides Freeciv clients
with a set of sounds for different events and actions in the game.
The .wav files included
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2003 16:55:54 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Duplicate
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated 25 Apr 2003 22:14:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line hyperlatex adoption
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2003 13:47:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#141521: fixed in ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-25
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xfe
Version : 0.54
Upstream Author : Roland Baudin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/xfe
* License : GPL
Description : X File Explorer
X File Expl
Sam Hocevar wrote:
> retitle 149933 ITA: gravitywars
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2003, Pekka Aleksi Knuutila wrote:
> > >If you are not interested anymore, well, I'll adopt it myself :-)
> >
> > Go ahead, you'll probably make a better job :-)
>
>Cool, I'll upload the new version within
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Kevin McMahon wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I was wondering what the status of your port of autoinstall-ia64 was? Is it
> going to be released any time soon?
>
Hi Kevin,
I just heard from Progeny this week that the future of autoinstall is
uncertain. It will most likely be repla
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 12:27:34PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hello
Hi
> Sorry, misunderstanding: I liked to say that 1.4MB is waste regardless of the
> package merging or not, because the data can be gathered from the already
> installed packages and put together on the fly..
ah, ok. n
Hi
I just wanted to know if you still intend to package this software,
cause IMO it's really useful and you seem to have forgotten about it.
Don't get me wrong, but you have filled ITP's on 4 pieces of software
and really packaged none. I really encourage you to package things for
Debian, but I th
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-25
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: netrik
Version : 1.8.0
Upstream Author : Olaf D. Buddenhagen AKA antrik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://netrik.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : text
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-25
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: atop
Version : 1.9
Upstream Author : Gerlof Langeveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : ftp://ftp.ATComputing.nl/pub/tools/linux
* License : GPL
Description : Monitor for
Hello
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 12:13:18PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > If it's only 88kb, then why not putting it into the grub package.
>
> Just to clear out: on the size argument, excuse me but it's inconsistent.
> you can't suggest putting it into grub because it's so big (1.44MB) and
> then
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 05:53:56PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
>
> If it's only 88kb, then why not putting it into the grub package.
Just to clear out: on the size argument, excuse me but it's inconsistent.
you can't suggest putting it into grub because it's so big (1.44MB) and
then suggest t
* Package name: cpu
Version : 1.3.99a
Upstream Author : Blake Matheny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cpu.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : an LDAP user management tool written in C
Bcc: Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2003 02:47:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#189522: fixed in xautolock 1:2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 189810 ITA: slmon -- A simple S-Lang based system performance monitor
Bug#189810: O: slmon -- A simple S-Lang based system performance monitor
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
18 matches
Mail list logo