On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:58:36PM -0400, Joe Nahmias wrote:
>
> Hello mentors,
>
> A while ago I tried to adopt the package moon-lander while I waited for
> my nm application to go through. I posted a sponsorship request to this
> list in March 2003, to no avail...
>
> I would really like to h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello mentors,
A while ago I tried to adopt the package moon-lander while I waited for
my nm application to go through. I posted a sponsorship request to this
list in March 2003, to no avail...
I would really like to have this package formally adopt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 196504
Bug#196504: ITP: mozilla-thunderbird -- a standalone redesign of the Mozilla
mail component
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> retitle 196504 ITP: thunderbird -- A standalone redesign of the mozilla mail
> client
Bug#196504: ITP: m
reopen 196504
retitle 196504 ITP: thunderbird -- A standalone redesign of the mozilla mail
client
thanks mate
I'll take this one =-)
Cheers,
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim 0411-283-060
"Do not bend."
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-09-04
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: freeradius
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : The FreeRADIUS Server Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.freeradius.org/
* License : GPL2 with one library LGPL
Descript
Package: wnpp
Version: 1.0.5-2
Severity: normal
I no longer use this, so am no longer fit to maintain it. As I'm also
the upstream author any prospective new maintainer must be willing to
become the new upstream as well.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry, ITP is the same as #208405.
My provider bounced the mail from reportbug because it contained an
unroutable Sender field.
Unfortunatly it only bounced the mail to me and not the one to
bugs.debian.org. :(
Greetings,
Roland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNAT
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: x25-utils
Version : 2.3.93
Upstream Author : Jonathan Simon Naylor
* URL : http://www.baty.hanse.de/linux-x25/utils/
* License : unknown (have to clear that up, probably B
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pc300
Version : 4.0.0
Upstream Author : Cyclades Coperation
* URL : ftp://ftp.cyclades.com/pub/cyclades/pc300/linux/
* License : GPL
Description : utilities for conf
oops, the license on this is GPL. sorry about that.
-l
Hi.
I would also be interested in helping maintaining this package.
Have not much time atm (sorry for this short notice) but would come back
to it next week (perhaps better on IRC).
This solves not really the problem of a "primary" maintainer as both
volunteers so far are no DD's :/
Gruesse,
--
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sneps
Version : 2.6.0
Upstream Author : Stuart C. Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/sneps/
* License : GPL
Description : Semantic Network Processsing System
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: potrace
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Peter Selinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://potrace.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : utility to transform
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sgml-spell-checker
Version : 20030828
Upstream Author : Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/spellcheck.html
* License : B
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 192698 ITA: openmosix -- Development files for openmosix
Bug#192698: RFA: openmosix -- Development files for openmosix
Changed Bug title.
> clone 192698 -1
Bug#192698: ITA: openmosix -- Development files for openmosix
Bug 192698 cloned as bug 2
Hi,
Sorry to bother you again about cpu. As I said I aim to have CPU available
in sarge. From a rapid calculation it seems that for this to happen a
realistic deadline would be to have it uploaded for the 8th of september.
This considering it takes about a week for the ftpmasters to scrutinize
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 07:09:58PM +0200, Roland wrote:
> Description : LDAP Account Manager (LAM) manages Unix and Samba
> accounts in a LDAP directory.
Perhaps this should be something like "webfrontend for managing accounts
stored in an openLDAP server".
> It runs on a webserver and is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Rottmann wrote:
| It would be interesting if this ships its own webserver (like cups) or
| uses an existing one, and if so, how it is implemented (CGI,
| PHP...). A quick glance at the website doesn't seem to reveal this,
| too.
LDAP Account
18 matches
Mail list logo