Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mathomatic
Version : 11.0
Upstream Author : George Gesslein II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.panix.com/~gesslein/
* License : LGPL
Description : Portable computer algebra system
Mathomatic impleme
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: unshield
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : David Eriksson (?) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://synce.sourceforge.net/synce/unshield.php
* License : MIT
Description : utility to extract InstallShield cabinet
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:24:00PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> The original Artistic license is not appropriate for licensing
> anything that is not approximately perl, because of the way it is
> worded. It is a terrible license. Do not use it. It's also highly
> questionable as to whether t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: metapixel
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Mark Probst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/~schani/metapixel/
* License : GPL
Description : a generator for photomosaics
Metapixel is
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 02:24:54PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Package name: elfsign
> Version : 0.2.0
> Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> URL : http://www.hick.org/code/skape/elfsign/
> License : Artistic
> Description : ELF binary signing a
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:58:35PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:24:00PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >
> > The original Artistic license is not appropriate for licensing
> > anything that is not approximately perl, because of the way it is
> > worded. It is a terrib
Your message dated Wed, 5 May 2004 13:44:21 -
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 05:03:59PM -0500,
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 26 lines which said:
> httping show you how long it takes to connect to a hostname or
> remote url; send a request and retrieve the reply (only the
> headers).
What does it make that echoping (a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: hearts
Version : 1.98
Upstream Author : Luis Pedro Coelho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://hearts.luispedro.org
* License : GPL
Description : KDE card game for four persons
Hearts is similar to the hearts
Hi, my name is Jennifer, Or just Jen for short! ;-)
My friend said you were a really cool person and I should get in contact with you!
I looked at your profile and thought I would contact you.
I love meeting new people, I also love to talk. I just got my videocam working
so you can see me t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 232867 ITA: mailreader -- Simple, but powerful WWW mail reader system
Bug#232867: O: mailreader -- Simple, but powerful WWW mail reader system
Changed Bug title.
>
End of m
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 03:16:08PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> Hearts is similar to the hearts game that comes
> with Microsoft Windows, allowing four persons
> to participate in a game.
Microsoft didn't invent hearts. Is it really necessary to refer to
them? How about: Hearts is a four
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 223856
Bug#223856: ITP: cslh -- a live support chat system.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Frederik Dannemare wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: hearts
Version : 1.98
Upstream Author : Luis Pedro Coelho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://hearts.luispedro.org
* License : GPL
Description : KDE card game for four persons
Heart
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 07:57, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > httping show you how long it takes to connect to a hostname or
> > remote url; send a request and retrieve the reply (only the
> > headers).
>
> What does it make that echoping (already in Debian) does not?
Apparently nothing new. I hav
ejabberd_0.5-1_i386.deb is packaged since march but as not been uploaded to
debian yet.
it can be downloaded from Erlang-Projects website at:
http://www.erlang-projects.org/Public/rpmdeb/ejabber_0.5_debian/view
Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Package name: elfsign
> Version : 0.2.0
> Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> URL : http://www.hick.org/code/skape/elfsign/
> License : Artistic
> Description : E
What is the status of this ITP?
If no one else is going to do it, I would really like to do this.
It seems to me that this package needs a lot of scripting glue to setup
devices prior to mountall.sh. Also, it needs integration with mkinitrd for
rootfs crypto. Furthermore, care has to be taken not
On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 16:40, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> I didn't know this, and it sounds completely and utterly sick. Is
> there a chance of getting a more reasonable approach (such as taking
> care of backwards compatibility) out of upstream?
>
> Regards, Jens.
I don't know, or really care that
On Wednesday 05 May 2004 15:56, William Ballard wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 03:16:08PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> > Hearts is similar to the hearts game that comes
> > with Microsoft Windows, allowing four persons
> > to participate in a game.
>
> Microsoft didn't invent hearts. Is it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bacula-watcher
Version : 0.1-pre
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.indpnday.com/bacula/
* License : GPL
Description : Web frontend to Bacula's catalog
Bacula-watcher is a web fr
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 03:16:08PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> * Package name: hearts
> Version : 1.98
> Upstream Author : Luis Pedro Coelho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://hearts.luispedro.org
> * License : GPL
> Description : KDE card game for
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:24:00PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> The original Artistic license is not appropriate for licensing
> anything that is not approximately perl, because of the way it is
> worded. It is a terrible license. Do not use it. It's also highly
> questionable as to whether t
23 matches
Mail list logo
