Matej Vela wrote:
Do you still intend to adopt these?
Package done: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:18:00 +0200
URL: http://archive.daniel-baumann.lan/debian/packages/sodipodi/0.34-1/
I'm just waiting for my sponsor..
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:
Matej Vela wrote:
Frederic, your package pronto is the only reverse dependency of
liblingua-ispell-perl. Perhaps you'd like to adopt it?
Actually I thought about orphaning (and possibly removing) pronto.
This would be a perfect trigger.
Regards,
Frederic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 08:55:32AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Matej Vela wrote:
Do you still intend to adopt these?
Package done: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:18:00 +0200
URL: http://archive.daniel-baumann.lan/debian/packages/sodipodi/0.34-1/
I'm just waiting for my sponsor..
It conflicts with
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 08:56:40AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Matej Vela wrote:
Do you still intend to adopt these?
Package done: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:45:00 +0200
URL: http://archive.daniel-baumann.lan/debian/packages/libmpeg1/1.3.1-3/
I'm just waiting for my sponsor..
This...
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:10:56AM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Matej Vela wrote:
Frederic, your package pronto is the only reverse dependency of
liblingua-ispell-perl. Perhaps you'd like to adopt it?
Actually I thought about orphaning (and possibly removing) pronto.
This would be a
Hello there,
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:53:07 -0600, David Alexander Contreras wrote:
retitle 294849 ITA: txt2html -- Text to HTML converter
owner 294849 !
As seven months have passed without any visible action (as in: no
followups to any bugreport, including this one; no package on
Hello Jean-Remy, hello Matteo,
it looks like both of you intent to maintain krecipes, but one of you
apparently didn't provide any packages yet while the other forgot to
fill in an ITP.
Perhaps you might want to coordinate your efforts?
For reference, please see
http://bugs.debian.org/309280,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 327561 ITA: xmms -- versatile X audio player
Bug#327561: O: xmms -- Versatile X audio player that looks like Winamp
Changed Bug title.
owner 327561 !
Bug#327561: ITA: xmms -- versatile X audio player
Owner recorded as David Moreno Garza [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 270844 ITA: netjuke -- Web-Based Audio Streaming Jukebox
Bug#270844: ITP: netjuke -- Web-Based Audio Streaming Jukebox
Changed Bug title.
severity 270844 normal
Bug#270844: ITA: netjuke -- Web-Based Audio Streaming Jukebox
Severity set to
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:17:09 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Package exists in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:18:25 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixing WNPP problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:18:49 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixing WNPP problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:17:16 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Package exist in Debian now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 04:17:19 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Package exist in Debian now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 107808 RM: diskless -- RoQA; buggy, unmaintained, better alternative
available
Bug#107808: ITA: diskless -- Diskless clustering
Changed Bug title.
reassign 107808 ftp.debian.org
Bug#107808: RM: diskless -- RoQA; buggy, unmaintained, better
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 327462
Bug#327462: RFP: icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 327764 O: doc-debian-ko -- Debian FAQ and other documents to Korean
Bug#327764: O: doc-debian-ko
Changed Bug title.
retitle 327775 O: rhdb-admin -- Graphical tool to administer PostgreSQL/RHDB
Databases
Bug#327775: O: rhdb-admin
Changed Bug
Hi.
hi
I've grabbed the package from mentors.d.n. Please clarify the
following points:
0) does it make sense to package 0.3.4b now when 0.3.5 is in
preparation by upstream?
the package was orphaned and the current version in debian is 0.2.8
until 0.3.5 will be released, the current stable
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Teemu Ikonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: imview-doc
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Hugues Talbot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cmis.csiro.au/Hugues.Talbot/imview/
* License : GFDL
Description : The
Hi,
Prospective adopters can take a look at an alternative implementation
at http://onegeek.org/~tom/software/the_bin/.
Cheers,
Matej
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hello there,
Hello,
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:53:07 -0600, David Alexander Contreras wrote:
retitle 294849 ITA: txt2html -- Text to HTML converter
owner 294849 !
As seven months have passed without any visible action (as in: no
followups
Re: Fathi Boudra in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0) does it make sense to package 0.3.4b now when 0.3.5 is in
preparation by upstream?
the package was orphaned and the current version in debian is 0.2.8
until 0.3.5 will be released, the current stable upstream is 0.3.4b
Instead of waiting for the
Could this be renamed to pyicqt, removing hyphen?
http://bugs.debian.org/320213 is MSN transport for Jabber, and it feels
strange for one to be named pyicq-t, and other pymsnt.
FreeBSD porters evaded this problem by naming them jabber-pymsn and
jabber-pyicq.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ruben Porras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libpam-encfs
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Anders Aagaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://hollowtube.mine.nu/wiki/index.php/PAM/PamEncfs
* License : GPLv2 or later
CLIENT ALERT - For your immediate review:
Sorry for the initial delay, but your file has now been reviewed and we are
happy to present you with three options for you to consider.
Please note that this is a time sensitive matter and that your previous credit
situation should not be a factor.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 327462 RFP: icecc-icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
Bug#327462: RFP: icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
Changed Bug title.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
[Ruben Porras]
This PAM module integrates encfs [0] and PAM, so home directories
are automatically mounted on login. EncFS provides an encrypted
filesystem in user-space, this PAM module easily allow each user to
have an encrypted home, and mount it using its login password as
encfs password
Following recent packages available via the Morphix archive, upstream
has come to the conclusion that a rewrite is necessary to make ibuild
cooperate with dist-utils, which will then make it easier to use CDBS
and other standard GNU tools to automatically configure the package.
Therefore, the
El lun, 12-09-2005 a las 17:39 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen escribió:
[Ruben Porras]
This PAM module integrates encfs [0] and PAM, so home directories
are automatically mounted on login. EncFS provides an encrypted
filesystem in user-space, this PAM module easily allow each user to
have an
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:01:07 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
retitle 289434 ITA: libconfig-general-perl -- generic configuration module
owner 289434 !
thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed
Well, I'd really like to take over, yet as long as there are no bugs
and no new upstream release there is not much I can possibly do, as I
usually refrain from uploading just
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 289434 ITA: libconfig-general-perl -- generic configuration module
Bug#289434: O: libconfig-general-perl -- generic configuration module
Changed Bug title.
owner 289434 !
Bug#289434: ITA: libconfig-general-perl -- generic configuration module
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 20:56 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:08:04PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
* Package name: rpmstrap
Version : 0.5
* URL : http://hackers.progeny.com/~sam/rpmstrap/
* License : GPL
Description :
reopen 327462
On Monday 12 September 2005 12:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
It seems that the package you have requested now exists in the
Debian archive.
Information about the package:
Package: icecream
Binary: icecream
Version: 0.8-3
Priority: optional
Section: net
Hello Jay,
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:12:46 +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
I am really surprized there is no Archive::Ar module in Debian
repository. Well, RFP follows.
Just for your interest, I guess you are the best suited person to
package this, if you think it should enter the archives...
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Do you still intend to adopt these?
Package done: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:45:00 +0200
URL: http://archive.daniel-baumann.lan/debian/packages/libmpeg1/1.3.1-3/
I'm just waiting for my sponsor..
Isn't (s)he MIA right? You could be
reopen 327462
retitle 327462 RFP: kicecream -- distributed compiler like distcc for kde
thanks dude
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 03:33 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 03:17:20 2005
It seems that the package you have requested now exists in the
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 327462
Bug#327462: RFP: icecc-icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.
retitle 327462 RFP: kicecream -- distributed compiler like distcc for kde
Bug#327462: RFP: icecc-icecream -- distributed compiler
# Meh, this usually happen when I don't read the complete logs before
# doing any changes. Sorry.
retitle 327462 RFP: icecc-icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
thanks and sorry
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 11:48 -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
reopen 327462
retitle 327462 RFP: kicecream --
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Meh, this usually happen when I don't read the complete logs before
# doing any changes. Sorry.
retitle 327462 RFP: icecc-icecream -- distributed compiler like distcc
Bug#327462: RFP: kicecream -- distributed compiler like distcc for kde
Changed Bug
It needs a lot of work, and I've learned so much since then. I don't
think it's archive-ready at all.
Let me know if someone wants to pick it up upstream though. I have a lot
of plans for it that won't see the light of day until I'm finished with
a few larger projects.
-jay
On Mon, 2005-09-12
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 12:12 -0500, Sam Hart wrote:
For what it's worth, rpmstrap as it is today is actually based on a tool
developed in house at Progeny. This tool could only bootstrap Fedora
Core 2 at a specific revision. Looking at that code now and comparing it
to what I see inside of
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:17:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#280023: fixed in htp 1.15-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:12:31PM -0500, Sam Hart wrote:
To be completely honest with you, I've not looked much at the
debootstrap code before now. I have tried to mimic debootstrap's
interface without a doubt, but have only done so by *using* debootstrap
rather than snooping in its code.
Anthony Towns wrote:
Looking at the source it seems more based on than inspired by,
particular to rpmstrap itself, though the functions and scripts/*
files sure seem more derivative than just coincidently similar. If
so, it's in violation of debootstrap's license (by not including
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:41:26AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Looking at rpmstrap-0.1, we see the following code for handling options:
Also copied was debootstrap's --arch and --include handling; even
duplicating the bug where you have to say --arch i386 (with a space)
and --include=foo,bar
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libhtml-prototype-perl
Version : 1.33
Upstream Author : Sebastian Riedel, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~mramberg/HTML-Prototype-1.33/
* License
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 04:41 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Looking at rpmstrap-0.1, we see the following code for handling options:
snip
debootstrap uses the exact same code, except to say usage_err
1 NEEDSUITETARGET instead of usage_error and with two-space
indentation. The usual way to parse
Hello
Could this be renamed to pyicqt, removing hyphen?
http://bugs.debian.org/320213 is MSN transport for Jabber, and it feels
strange for one to be named pyicq-t, and other pymsnt.
Agreed.
Also, since PyMSNt and PyICQt are very similar, they should probably be
similary packaged.
I'll look
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 229960 ITP: aeromail -- Web-based e-mail client
Bug#229960: ITA: aeromail -- Web-based e-mail client
Changed Bug title.
severity 229960 wishlist
Bug#229960: ITP: aeromail -- Web-based e-mail client
Severity set to `wishlist'.
thanks
Stopping
retitle 229960 ITP: aeromail -- Web-based e-mail client
severity 229960 wishlist
thanks
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:23:44PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi SteX,
(...) I intend to request removal of aeromail from unstable. Please
feel free to continue working on this package if it interests
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:39:49 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line ftp.debian.org: please remove konq-speaker from
testing/unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:37:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326889: fixed in sigscheme 0.1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:53:33 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324730: fixed in libperldoc-search-perl 0.01-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:56:37 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323240: fixed in libpoe-component-jabber-perl 1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:55:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324732: fixed in libswish-api-common-perl 0.03-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:02:39 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326768: fixed in libscriptalicious-perl 1.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:04:57 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324367: fixed in amiwm 0.20.48-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
what about deleting the package? Its orphaning is about a
year old and there is a bunch of solitaire games in debian.
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
VIM has two modes - the one in which it
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:53:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:19:09PM -0500, Sam Hart wrote:
It actually was not my decision to GPLv2 it. I honestly didn't care what
license it was released under. GPLv2 was just what the original base as
written by Branden Robinson was copyrighted under.
1) Identical command-line
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 09:57:57PM +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
package ecp
retitle 321808 ITA: ecb -- Code browser for several languages for Emacs.
owner 321808 !
[...]
I'll take this. :) I just happened to fetch this package a couple of
days ago as I was looking on trying out CEDET and ECB.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
this is a request for packaging of the Python matplotlib module. it is
a Python implementation of plotting and data file loading mainly for
scientific purposes. the commands and their usage are very intuitive to users
of Matlab and octave. the website is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 206691 328027
Bug#206691: ITP: python-matplotlib -- A python based gtk plotting system in a
style similar to matlab, aiming for publication quality plots.
Bug#328027: RFP: python2.4-matplotlib -- matplotlib is a Python module that
implements
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:17:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238032: fixed in twutils 0.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Do you still intend to adopt ecb? (This is just a ping, I'm not
interested in adopting it myself.)
Thanks,
Matej
Yes, I am! =) In fact I'm waiting for a sponsor, having posted an RFS at
-mentors and at http://sponsors.debian.net . The packages are at
66 matches
Mail list logo
