On Monday 03 October 2005 01:21, Mark Purcell wrote:
On Sunday 02 October 2005 20:26, George Danchev wrote:
Sorry for replying to myself, but I would like to get some advices of how
to proceed from now on. The kiax 0.8.4 [1] issues read:
George. Thanks for your continued work on this.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 225010
Bug#225010: RFP: xdirectfb -- X server with DirectFB backend
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks bts
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:10:23 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#230902: fixed in fusionsound 0.9.22-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
owner 188175 Jose Carlos Medeiros [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#188175: ITA: filerunner -- X-Based FTP program file manager
Owner changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Jose Carlos Medeiros [EMAIL
PROTECTED].
owner 303616 Jose Carlos Medeiros [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:12:56 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#317602: fixed in xmms-openspc 0.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:11:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329695: fixed in slgdbm 1.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:11:49 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#241287: fixed in xmms-musepack 1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:13:39 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330355: fixed in libmms 0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Stefan
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:14:54AM +0200, Stefan Ott wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 03:45:02 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329429: fixed in libavg 0.2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:11:52 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#317602: fixed in xmms-openspc 0.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 04:36:39 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329321: fixed in yasm 0.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 04:52:18 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#319256: fixed in nadoka 0.6.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 04:50:03 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#181442: fixed in mrtg-rrd 0.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Gaudenz
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:16:15PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Hi Stefan
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:14:54AM +0200, Stefan Ott wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin
Version :
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 04:56:26 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#318618: fixed in patchage 0.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Stefan Ott wrote:
Hi Gaudenz
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:16:15PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Hi Stefan
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:14:54AM +0200, Stefan Ott wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:11:33 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#327128: fixed in python-pysqlite1.1 1.1.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 324990 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#324990: ITP: avahi -- mDNS daemon
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:10:30 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#289789: fixed in imlib 1.9.14-19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
I'm not an xfce4 user, so I don't know. I just think that a tarball of 3
source packages (of which only 1 is the actual source code). Does not
warrant a package on it's own.
Well, that's what most xfce4 plugins look like
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:07:23 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#306226: fixed in connect-proxy 1.95-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 05:58:14 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329455: fixed in ree 1.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:10:13 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329925: fixed in e00compr 1.0.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:46:14 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#303013: fixed in xfmedia 0.9.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 330244 ITA: spell -- GNU Spell, a clone of Unix `spell'
Bug#330244: O: spell -- GNU Spell, a clone of Unix `spell'
Changed Bug title.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign #327603 wnpp
Bug#327603: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `asmem' to `wnpp'.
retitle #327603 O: asmem -- memory utilization monitor with AfterStep look
feel
Bug#327603: very old package
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 07:12:56 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330092: fixed in set-crontab-perl 1.00-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:12:31 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330023: fixed in libgalago 0.3.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:10:45 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330710: fixed in karrigell 2.1.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:09:43 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324214: fixed in ttf-khmeros 3.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:11:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330355: fixed in libmms 0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:02:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#280691: fixed in efax 1:0.9a-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
owner 331325 Debian Xfce Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331325: ITP: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin -- cpufreq information plugin for the
Xfce4 panel
Owner changed from stefan ott [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Debian Xfce Maintainers
[EMAIL PROTECTED].
thanks
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 331470 pending
Bug#331470: faqomatic: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
tags 288209 pending
Bug#288209: ITA: audio-cd -- Library to handle CDDB and low-level cd io calls
There were no tags
Your message dated Mon, 3 Oct 2005 19:16:42 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libpostscriptbarcode
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:11:30 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324019: fixed in owl-dms 0.81-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Marc,
where are you about this package?
0.2 is out for a month and I don't see any update on your side.
thanks to update me (and others) back, and if necessary, to call for a bit of help.
See you,
Arnaud
Well it looks like there are two interested parties.
Matt, what is your developer status?
Cai Qian, it can't go into main. The license is non-free and will remain
so. The Windows and Mac versions are shareware so the author doesn't
want to loosen the restrictions on the Unix version, nor does
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
reopen 306226
Bug#306226: ITP: avinfo -- Audio/Video information automatic extractor / file
list generator
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
close 306268
Bug#306268: ITP: connect -- Establish socket connection using SOCKS4 or 5 and
HTTP tunnel.
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vegar Storvann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: debinstaller
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
* URL : http://www.daimi.au.dk/~kamstrup/linux/
* License : GPL
Description : a graphical
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:02:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#288209: fixed in audio-cd 0.05-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: xmoto
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : Rasmus Neckelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://xmoto.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : 2D motocross platform
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:06:40AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
Hi
When I merged this bug with my very old ITP, I intended that to mean I
was abdicating / abandoning mine. I realise now that this might not
have been clear. Mathias, please go ahead with your packaging. (:
I finished the
Em Seg, 2005-10-03 às 23:09 +0200, Vegar Storvann escreveu:
* Package name: debinstaller
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
* URL : http://www.daimi.au.dk/~kamstrup/linux/
* License : GPL
Description : a graphical frontend
Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
Em Seg, 2005-10-03 às 23:09 +0200, Vegar Storvann escreveu:
* Package name: debinstaller
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
* URL : http://www.daimi.au.dk/~kamstrup/linux/
* License : GPL
Description
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
owner 261681 Ana Isabel Delgado Dominguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#261681: ITA: photopc -- Interface to digital still cameras
Owner recorded as Ana Isabel Delgado Dominguez [EMAIL PROTECTED].
owner 289789 Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289789:
Quick question. Are all ITAs supposed to have an owner? I mean, is it
desirable? I think so, but I maybe wrong. Probably checking all ITAs out
there without ownership would need some work to be done.
Thanks.
--
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.damog.net/
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 18:30:49 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329257: fixed in libstat-lsmode-perl 0.50-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 07:51:39PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
Quick question. Are all ITAs supposed to have an owner? I mean, is it
Yes, at least all new ones.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Your message dated Mon, 3 Oct 2005 15:34:17 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libpostscriptbarcode
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
52 matches
Mail list logo
