Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:40:08 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line ITP: libemf -- drawing toolkit for window metafiles (wmf/emf)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:47:07 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#249719: fixed in dosemu-freedos 1:0.0.b9r5a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 02:47:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#307356: fixed in animal 0.14.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: omegat
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Keith Godfrey
* URL : http://www.omegat.org/omegat/omegat.html
* License : GPL
Description : translation memory application for professional translators
OmegaT is a
Hi,
For potential ITPers: mtasc will not compile with the latest upstream
release of extlib, instead it needs the CVS version. So, you will have
to convince Nicolas Cannasse to find time to release a new extlib and
get that into debian before you start work on mtasc.
--
bye,
pabs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: seamonkey
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : SeaMonkey Council [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
* License : MPL
Description : internet application suite
The SeaMonkey
Hi Simo,
What is the status of your swftools package, is it ready to upload?
Where can I view the latest version? Would you like me to help you find
a sponsor?
My email is down atm, so please reply to the bug as well as to me.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:12:17 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#316706: fixed in njam 1.25-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:38:37 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#347330: fixed in plotdrop 0.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:12:17 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#316706: fixed in njam 1.25-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:12:17 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#316706: fixed in njam 1.25-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:06:59 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#283105: fixed in slimserver 6.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Source: slimserver
Source-Version: 6.2.1-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
slimserver, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
Cool! How are you solving the DFSG problems with the firmware and
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:23:24 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344359: fixed in flowscan-cuflow 1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:16:45 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#345017: fixed in graphicsmagick 1.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:42:19 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#341904: fixed in libjson-ruby 0.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 302895 ITA: wmitime -- yet another clock dock app for Window Maker
Bug number 302895 not found.
package wnpp
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wnpp
owner 349245 !
Bug#349245: O: wmitime -- yet another clock dock app for Window Maker
Owner
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:00:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344520: fixed in comixcursors 0.3.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:08:49 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#345275: fixed in maypole 2.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Has there been any activity on this package lately? HAL/DBUS are not an
issue anymore as up to date versions are in unstable now.
As 0.5.1 is already more than 3 months old, would you consider to
package an up to date CVS snapshot? The reasoning behind this is, that
CVS has WPA support whereas
If anything is needed in the upstream to speed adoption, just ask me
and it will be done.
Bye
--
Stefano RIVOIR
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:56:17 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#347849: fixed in easychem 0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:59:16 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#348104: fixed in libfile-homedir-perl 0.52-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:38:46 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#348430: fixed in libgnuplot-ruby 2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:28:15 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#348683: fixed in libfcgi-procmanager-perl 0.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:31:01 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#348508: fixed in autodir 0.99.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:27:00 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#348816: fixed in libdatetime-format-w3cdtf-perl 0.04-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:26:38 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#348813: fixed in libdatetime-format-mail-perl 0.2901-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:12:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#251616: fixed in libvigraimpex 1.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:26:44PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Hi Simo,
What is the status of your swftools package, is it ready to upload?
Where can I view the latest version? Would you like me to help you find
a sponsor?
My email is down atm, so please reply to the bug as well as to me.
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:21:07 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#342264: fixed in octplot 0.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:24:48 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334807: fixed in psemu-video-x11 1.15-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: darcs+trac
Version :
Upstream Author :
* URL or Web page :
* License :
Description : Enhanced wiki and issue tracking system for software
development projects, darcs back end
Trac is a minimalistic approach to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: trac-hacks
Version :
Upstream Author :
* URL or Web page : http://trac-hacks.org/
* License :
Description : A collection of very useful trac plugins
trac-hacks.org hosts a collection of very useful trac plugins.
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:05:43 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#348382: fixed in collatinus 7.13-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:49:50 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324632: fixed in gausssum 1.0.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:51:14 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#325289: fixed in user-he 1.0.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:59:04 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329116: fixed in gnudoku 0.93-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:35:35 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#338694: fixed in denyhosts 1.1.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:35:11 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#345284: fixed in libmemcache 1.4.0.rc1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:38:32 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334405: fixed in pyracerz 0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:53:48 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344787: fixed in katapult 0.3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
LaTeX-Mk is a collection of Makefile fragments and shell scripts for
managing small to large sized LaTeX projects. The typical LaTeX-Mk
input file is simply a series of variable definitions in a Makefile
for the project. After creating a simple Makefile the user can
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:30:18 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#312880: fixed in skencil 0.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:16:12 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#348309: fixed in dhcdbd 1.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Stefano Rivoir wrote:
If anything is needed in the upstream to speed adoption, just ask me
and it will be done.
Thanks that you asked, I would have come to you with the following two
issues in the next few days anyway:
1. pfqueue uses wrong soname for its libraries
it looks up for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 298229 ITP: qemu-launcher -- A launcher for Qemu
Bug#298229: RFP: qemu-launcher -- A launcher for Qemu that manages Qemu configs
and creates disk images
Changed Bug title.
owner 298229 !
Bug#298229: ITP: qemu-launcher -- A launcher for Qemu
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:35:19 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#341204: fixed in ept 1.88.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:40:12 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#350048: fixed in jigl 2.0.1+20060126-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:35:20 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#341204: fixed in ept 1.88.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reopen 286847
retitle 286847 ITP: libnl -- library for applications dealing with netlink
socket
thanks
As future versions of NetworkManager will depend on libnl, it will become
increasingly important.
That's why I will package it.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 286847
Bug#286847: RFP: libnl -- library for applications dealing with netlink socket
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
retitle 286847 ITP: libnl -- library for applications dealing with netlink
socket
Bug#286847: RFP: libnl -- library
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
owner 286847 !
Bug#286847: ITP: libnl -- library for applications dealing with netlink socket
Owner recorded as Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED].
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Baishampayan Ghose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: latex2man
Version : 1.19
Upstream Author : Dr. Jürgen Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.informatik-vollmer.de/software/latex2man.php
* License : LaTeX
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 190560 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#190560: ITP: kernel-patch-bootsplash -- This is the home of the graphical
boot process for the linux kernel
Bug#188439: ITP: kernel-patch-bootsplash -- Kernel patch to display a graphical
boot splash-screen
Bug
reopen 190560 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 188439 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Hi,
the package is there in agnula, will be uploading soon.
kernel-patch-bootsplash (2.6.15-0) unstable; urgency=low
* Add patch for 2.6.15
-- Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:51:48 +0100
Hi Gregor,
what's the status of this ITP? Are you still interested in package
planetplanet? Do you need help?
Thanks, Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
After having spoken to the current maintainer - I am willing to adopt this
package, and the current maintainer has agreed.
I will be seeking a sponsor and intend to upload a new version soon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #349419
Owner: Sébastien ESTIENNE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The debianization has been sent upstream
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers dapper-updates
APT policy: (500, 'dapper-updates'), (500, 'dapper-security'), (500, 'dapper')
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to hijack 'equivs', as its maintainer (Fabio Rafael da Rosa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) is believed MIA.
I will wait a week or so to see he shows up.
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I have some (obscure and probably a bit pervert ;-) interest in this
program, and the bugs I'm seing in the BTS don't look especially hard
to fix.
Unless someone else stands up, I'd be ok to take over the package,
though I don't know how long I'll be able to make it live if upstream
is dead...
They are the only reason this package *exists*.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would enjoy working on dselect. Unfortunately it is rather badly entangled
with the dpkg source, and I do not enjoy working on it in this situation. I
have tried, but failed, to disentangle it into a separate source package. If
someone manages to do that, get back to me and I'll help work
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:39:53AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
what's the status of this ITP? Are you still interested in package
planetplanet? Do you need help?
I never wanted to package it myself; that's why I've filed an RFP in
August 2005, which was retitled to ITP by Michael
64 matches
Mail list logo
