Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:28:40 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hows it been going?
The more outrageous the claim
Get your uMONuEY fast. We can close your L0uAN in days, not months.
U S $ 300 ,000 uL0 uANSare avai lable for only $277 / month=
! WE'RE uPRACT ICALLY uGIVIuNG uAWAY MOuNEY!
-
COPY the Addreuss
Hias,
Got my email back, yay!
Solved the libsynfig non-PIC problem by using AC_LIBLTDL_INSTALLABLE
instead of AC_LIBLTDL_CONVENIENCE (committed upstream and in
pkg-synfig), which uses the system ltdl instead of the embedded one.
I've disabled the libavcodec plugin for now since upstream's
Hello,
we are happy to announce the Debian Kolab (www.kolab.org) packages:
http://pkg-kolab.alioth.debian.org/
We built these packages for one of our customer at work
(www.credativ.de) and are happy to give the work completly to Debian and
the users.
The reason why we don't use the upstream
Op zaterdag 4 februari 2006 14:45, schreef Noèl Köthe:
we are happy to announce the Debian Kolab (www.kolab.org) packages:
http://pkg-kolab.alioth.debian.org/
We built these packages for one of our customer at work
(www.credativ.de) and are happy to give the work completly to Debian and
the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: sonic-snap
Version : 1.7
Upstream Author : Bram Stolk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.stolk.org/sonic-snap/
* License : GPL
Description : webcam application for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: flasm
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Igor Kogan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://flasm.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Description : command line assembler disassembler of Flash ActionScript
bytecode
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 351430 wnpp
Bug#351430: TAG: seamonkey-browser -- Seamonkey is a sophisticated graphical
World-Wide-Web browser, with a large number of various browser features like
support for HTML 4.0, CSS 2, JavaScript and Java.
Warning: Unknown package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: raccoonshow
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Jono Bacon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.jonobacon.org/projects/raccoonshow/
* License : GPL
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hans Ulrich Niedermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: pyinotify
Version : 0.3.3
Upstream Author : Sebastien Martini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://pyinotify.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description :
Jeff Breidenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Andi, Debian's infrastructure is designed such that a source package is not
allowed to be a build dependency. Matthew, please file a wishlist bug against
swig, requesting a version update.
I think I confused the issue. Unstable has SWIG 1.3.27.
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 00:38 -0500, Chris Hanson wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I no longer use this package, so I can't properly support it. I _am_
the upstream developer, but I don't plan to make any further releases,
as I no longer believe this package is the correct approach.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 348471 ITA: laptop-net -- automatically adapt laptop ethernet
Bug#348471: RFA: laptop-net -- automatically adapt laptop ethernet
Changed Bug title.
owner 348471 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#348471: ITA: laptop-net -- automatically adapt laptop
Debian GCC team,
We're looking at packaging PyLucene for Debian, and are having
some build dependency problems with sid. PyLucene currently
requires gcj 3.4.x, x =3. However, sid appears to only have gcj 4.x
I'm a little surprised to see this - I had thought it likely multiple
versions of gcj
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libmail-gnupg-perl
Version : 0.08
Upstream Author : Best Practical Solutions, LLC; Robert Spier [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
* URL :
reopen 251875 !
thanks
I'd like to reopen this ITP and take it over, if this is ok for the
original submitter and the last ITP'er (cc'ing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [0]). It's of course ok for me if David Everly
wants to continue his work on this package.
submitter 263821 !
thanks
I'd like to take over this ITP if that's ok for the original submitter
(cc'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED]). It's of course ok for me if David
Everly wants to continue his work on this package.
Here' the updated description for the package:
* Package name: libnet-z3950-perl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 251875 !
Bug#251875: ITP: libmarc-record-perl -- Perl extension for handling MARC records
Bug reopened, originator set to gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED].
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
submitter 263821 !
Bug#263821: ITP: libnet-z3950-perl -- Perl extension for talking to Z39.50
servers
Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to gregor herrmann [EMAIL
PROTECTED].
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libmarc-perl
Version : 1.07
Upstream Author : Chuck Bearden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Birthisel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libnet-amazon-perl
Version : 0.34
Upstream Author : Mike Schilli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Matthew,
Regarding the swig incompatibility, I think you are right. It probably
is a matter
of poking the right people and waiting.
However, it is technically possible to compile on Debian stable then upload the
binary package to unstable (a.k.a. sid). This can - somewhat - bypass the swig
issue
Hey whats up,
We 0 ffer low rates.
We=92re the nation=92s top REefineancencompany for people with less-than-p=
erfect eCREeDIT.
U S $ 300 ,000 eL0 eANSare avai lable for only $277 / month=
! WE'RE ePRACT ICALLY eGIVIeNG eAWAY MOeNEY!
-
COPY the
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
The gcj situation is more serious. No way in hell can we package the gcj
runtime inside the PyLucene package. As far as I can tell this is a
showstopper,although I'm curious what the gcj package maintainers have to
say about the matter.
Ah, if
24 matches
Mail list logo