Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2007 05:02:38 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419896: fixed in amsn 0.96+dfsg1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On 5/7/07, Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could you explain what you mean? My package is built with libtool 2.1a
(without dependency on its package) and it went to etch long time ago. I
don't understand why do you want to fill RC bugs for such packages.
vorlon was referring to buil
Do you mean I should just renumber the package version from 2.1a to 1.9 or
what? I think the versioning schema for this project is very bizzare. Also I
think it is not so important for experimental packages :)
2007/5/7, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:18:57PM +0200,
Could you explain what you mean? My package is built with libtool
2.1a(without dependency on its package) and it went to etch long time
ago. I
don't understand why do you want to fill RC bugs for such packages.
2007/5/7, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 04:19:33PM +02
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 386447 pending
Bug#386447: ITP: gnome-subtitles -- A subtitle editor for the GNOME desktop
There were no tags set.
Bug#386456: ITP: gnome-subtitles -- A subtitle editor for the GNOME desktop
On 1/4/07, Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can see It'll be a problem for the upstream but I have talked with
him so I'll suggest that he should change those graphics to another
because maybe he'll have problems in the future. If he does not want
to do it, I just wi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name : narlie
Upstream Author : Aaron Bockover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/banshee/trunk/narlie/
* License : MIT
Description : Lisp-like language for the CLR
H
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name : taglib-sharp
Upstream Author : Brian Nickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.taglib-sharp.com
* License : LGPL 2.1
Description : CLI library for reading and writing tags to
mul
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 263261 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#263261: ITP: marlin -- A GNOME sample editor
Owner changed from Sebastian Dröge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> owner 337096 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337096: ITP: daap-sharp -- CLI implementation of DAAP
Owne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 417130 ITP: cpushare -- a general purpose Low Cost Supercomputer.
Bug#417130: RFP: cpushare -- general purpose Low Cost and World Wide
Supercomputer available to everybody
Changed Bug title to ITP: cpushare -- a general purpose Low Cost Superco
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian VDR Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: vdr-plugin-mousemate
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Peter Pinnau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.unterbrecher.de/vdr/developer.php#mousemate
* License : GPL
D
On 5/7/07, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 00:24 -0400, Manuel García wrote:
> On 5/6/07, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Manuel,
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388136
> >
> > How is progress with this ITA ? Have you noticed t
retitle 375548 RFP: openvcp -- Linux-VServer Control Panel
noowner 375548
thanks
As upstream did not release any version that would imho be suitable for a
Debian release and I lost interest in this package anyway, I'm giving up this
ITP.
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl
GnuPG-ID: 0x
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 375548 RFP: openvcp -- Linux-VServer Control Panel
Bug#375548: ITP: openvcp -- Linux-VServer Control Panel
Changed Bug title to RFP: openvcp -- Linux-VServer Control Panel from ITP:
openvcp -- Linux-VServer Control Panel.
> noowner 375548
Bug#
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 04:19:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mike Hommey:
> > Why not package this as libtool and upload to experimental ?
> It would be impossible to build-depend on it. This may or may not be
> a good thing.
I don't imagine libtool-cvs is a target for inclusion in lenny
I've uploaded a new version to Sourceforge and updated the code on
launchpad (http://launchpad.net/python-snpp). Are you guys planning on
putting PySNPP in debian as a separate package as well? I've got deb
packaging for it, too, but never got around to getting it uploaded.
Monty
Bernd Zeimetz wr
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:18:57PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> 2007/5/7, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >* Mike Hommey:
> >
> >> Why not package this as libtool and upload to experimental ?
> >
> >It would be impossible to build-depend on it. This may or may not be
> >a good thing.
>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - bug #1185
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
thank you very much!
Monty Taylor wrote:
> Absolutely! I'll take care of that today.
>
>
> Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> Dear developers,
>>
>> as we are packaging Zenoss for Debian, which is using your PySNPP
>> module, w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ant4eclipse
Version : 0.5.0-RC1
Upstream Author : Nils Hartmann
Gerd Wütherich
Daniel Kasmeroglu
* URL : http://ant4eclipse.sourceforge.net/
* License : Eclipse public licen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kobayashi Noritada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libpasori
Version : 2~pre
Upstream Author : mjt
* URL : http://libpasori.sourceforge.jp/
* License : BSD
Description : Library for handling PaSoRi, a USB reader
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close #382723
Bug#382723: ITP: gaim-album -- Gaim plugin to archive buddy icons
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Richard Laager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> close #382726
Bug
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> I'd like to point out that "Gaim Plug-in Pack" Conflicts with several
> existing separate packages, such as gaim-irchelper. This should be
> thoroughly checked and Conflicts items be inserted in the control
> file, as appropriate.
>
Will do. Any help on this would be ap
I'd like to point out that "Gaim Plug-in Pack" Conflicts with several
existing separate packages, such as gaim-irchelper. This should be
thoroughly checked and Conflicts items be inserted in the control
file, as appropriate.
Additionally, the package really should be called pidgin-plugin-pack
to
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 16:33:40 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421556: fixed in libyaml-tiny-perl 1.04-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 16:32:00 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337578: fixed in slim 1.2.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 16:27:47 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417970: fixed in libwww-bugzilla-perl 0.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 16:26:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379147: fixed in fusedav 0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
2007/5/7, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
* Mike Hommey:
> Why not package this as libtool and upload to experimental ?
It would be impossible to build-depend on it. This may or may not be
a good thing.
I think the including libtool from cvs snapshot to the unstable
distribution might be
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 15:53:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420584: fixed in fontypython 0.2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Moi moi, hola!
Here is the diff.
--
Marc-André Lureau, GSmartMix
moap_0.2.3.1-1.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 15:48:51 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389817: fixed in pm-utils 0.99.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 15:50:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420648: fixed in liburi-template-perl 0.06-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 15:47:00 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398765: fixed in refocus 0.9.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 15:51:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420691: fixed in audacious-plugins-ugly 1.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Package: wnpp
Owner: "Marc-Andre Lureau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: moap
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Thomas Vander Stichele (thomas at apestaart dot org)
* URL : https://apestaart.org/moap/trac/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang:
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 15:11:53 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408347: fixed in proda 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 15:04:50 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420953: fixed in gscan2pdf 0.9.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 14:41:16 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414179: fixed in avelsieve 1.9.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 14:34:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420090: fixed in libxml-parser-lite-tree-perl 0.03-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 14:27:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420383: fixed in libnet-daap-dmap-perl 1.26-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 14:26:48 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416221: fixed in libgtkol 1.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 14:21:44 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420586: fixed in aeolus 0.6.6+2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 14:19:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352591: fixed in jericho-html 2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
* Mike Hommey:
> Why not package this as libtool and upload to experimental ?
It would be impossible to build-depend on it. This may or may not be
a good thing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 335404 RFP: php5-apc -- Caches and optimises PHP scripts to improve
performance
thanks
Heya,
I've installed the latest version on Etch/php5 (using pecl), and
it works very well. I'd appreciate a package of apc, but I don't
want to package it, as I'm preferring not to use php at all, and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 335404 RFP: php5-apc -- Caches and optimises PHP scripts to improve
> performance
Bug#335404: RFP: php4-apc -- Caches and optimises PHP scripts to improve
performance
Changed Bug title to RFP: php5-apc -- Caches and optimises PHP scripts to
i
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 13:45:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420520: fixed in clthreads 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 13:46:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420518: fixed in clxclient 3.3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 13:49:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420589: fixed in stops 0.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 13:44:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420564: fixed in py-asterisk 0.1a3+r160-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 13:35:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413491: fixed in krecordmydesktop 0.1~alpha1+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 13:34:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#276146: fixed in essays1743 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 13:04:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420289: fixed in ilf 1.5.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 12:56:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420165: fixed in commons-configuration 1.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 12:48:46 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419951: fixed in jexcelapi 2.6.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 12:43:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413826: fixed in haskell-hlist 2.0+darcs20070316-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 12:39:01 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374860: fixed in piespy 0.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 12:40:24 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395933: fixed in
libbusiness-onlinepayment-transactioncentral-perl 0.02-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 12:37:14 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419658: fixed in libmail-field-received-perl 0.24-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 7 May 2007 14:21:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 420319 pending
Bug#420319: ITP: tangerine-icon-theme -- an icon theme worked on by the Ubuntu
Art Team
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 11:39:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419966: fixed in libclass-std-perl 0.0.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 11:37:52 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419127: fixed in python-decorator 2.0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 11:40:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419968: fixed in libconfig-std-perl 0.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 11:32:39 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413998: fixed in giggle 0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 11:27:43 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419887: fixed in pypolicyd-spf 0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 11:08:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419340: fixed in convertall 0.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 11:02:35 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304330: fixed in iscsitarget 0.4.15-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 11:00:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389263: fixed in pyragua 0.2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 11:00:46 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419374: fixed in gpe-timesheet 0.31-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 10:52:58 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419048: fixed in fdm 1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 10:54:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419343: fixed in python-gdata 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 10:56:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419368: fixed in aufs 0+20070415-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 10:42:37 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413525: fixed in plexus-interactivity-api 1.0+svn5974-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 10:40:54 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418745: fixed in python-yenc 0.3+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 10:41:33 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419155: fixed in aspell-am 0.03-1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 10:31:43 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418858: fixed in xmds-doc 0~svn.1321-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 10:42:32 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413552: fixed in plexus-component-api 1.0+svn6176-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 10:39:52 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415687: fixed in entagged 0.31-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 10:29:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323043: fixed in qdox 1.6.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 10:29:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323043: fixed in qdox 1.6.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 10:22:38 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418122: fixed in mtpaint 3.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jsr107cache
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Greg Luck
* URL or Web page : http://sourceforge.net/projects/jsr107cache
* License : Apache Software License 2
Description : Java API for caching
JSR107 specifies API and sem
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2007 10:22:38 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411151: fixed in mtpaint 3.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hello Yann,
> Well, the main problem is that I do not have enough time to take care
> of the package, so in fact I have not checked 2.9a and the 3.0
> prereleases at all. Eventually I'll package them, and I'd be glad to
> see the platform issues solved - but this package would really benefit
> fr
Apologies, I've fixed the missing files (oversight on my
part in slvewier-artwork) so if you grabbed the package
before this email, regrab and install the .deb file.
--
Paul "TBBle" Hampson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office.
pgpfAfX7BZOFs.pgp
Description:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 411422 ITA: emms -- The Emacs MultiMedia System
Bug#411422: O: emms -- The Emacs MultiMedia Syste
Changed Bug title to ITA: emms -- The Emacs MultiMedia System from O: emms --
The Emacs MultiMedia Syste.
> owner 411422 !
Bug#411422: ITA: emms
87 matches
Mail list logo