Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2007 06:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361294: fixed in cfi 3.0-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:11:23AM +0200, arno wrote:
>
> Hi,
> my key has been signed by a debian developer now.
> It is key 0x2701B2B3 available on pgp.mit.edu
>
> I've uploaded on new version of noscript to mentors to change my email
> adress (and also to correct an error I made).
OK. I got
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 345075 pending
Bug#345075: celestia: new upstream release available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 374534 pending
Bug#374534: ITA: celestia -- A real-time visual space si
Paul Vixie wrote:
> please do not make a package out of this until i am done messing with the
> command line syntax and i have given it a version number.
sure.
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Owner: "Robert S. Edmonds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dnscap
Version : 20070511
Upstream Author : Paul Vixie,
Duane Wessels,
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
* URL
On Fri, 11 May 2007 16:05:34 +0100 Matthew Johnson wrote:
> For the Frets on Fire arcade game which we are packaging I have found
> an original artist willing to licence his works under the MIT licence.
That's great news, indeed! :)
> Four of the five songs are completely original works; the fi
2007/5/11, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'll update svn.
Thanks, :)
I'll downoad it and have a look. A friend of mine is probably testing the
packages (I guess his computer would be clean enough for this). I'll try
them in my lappy too.
I'll probably get another musician to make so
Hello,
Grab the initial source packaged using:
dget http://people.debian.org/~otavio/python-cups_1.9.21-1.dsc
TIA,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To
Package: wnpp
Owner: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
Package name: python-cups
Version : 1.9.21
Upstream Author : Tim Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Web page: http://cyberelk.net/tim/data/pycups/
License : GPL
Description : Python bindi
On Fri May 11 22:33, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > I've also added the sectoid songs to svn at
> > svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-games/packages/trunk/fretsonfire-data-sectoid and
> > I've added a patch to stop it trying to initialise amanith.
>
> Unconditionally or depending on whether it is available or not?
2007/5/11, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
fretsonfire depends fretsonfire-data-sectoid
fretsonfire-data-* depends fretsonfire
There have been a lot of threads against circular dependencies, I don't
think we should have them.
Miry
--- Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Right, I've gone through the fonts. There aren't really any similar
> ones, so I've found one which will work for both (ttf-mgopen;
> MgOpenCosmeticaRegular.ttf) and looks fine. I've therefore updated the
> packaging to remove all the fonts, dep
Right, I've gone through the fonts. There aren't really any similar
ones, so I've found one which will work for both (ttf-mgopen;
MgOpenCosmeticaRegular.ttf) and looks fine. I've therefore updated the
packaging to remove all the fonts, depend on this and vera and symlink
them in debian/rules.
I've
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: scanmem
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Tavis Ormandy
* URL : http://taviso.decsystem.org/scanmem.html
* License : GNU GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Lo
Hi all,
I've made some new packages of ROOT. The are available from
deb http://mirror.phy.bnl.gov/debian-root unstable main
deb-src http://mirror.phy.bnl.gov/debian-root unstable main
Binary packages for i386 and powerpc are available. Contributed builds
are welcome.
- IM
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:19:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326892: fixed in pypy 1.0.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 325306
Bug#325306: ITP: root -- An object oriented data analysis framework
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:23:44 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419982: fixed in create-resources 0.1.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:12:36 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368437: fixed in tucnak1 1.32-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:15:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422867: fixed in ocaml-alsa 0.1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:20:48 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392291: fixed in medit 0.8.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:21:43 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#407637: fixed in dmalloc 5.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:19:59 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415766: fixed in bzr-email 0.0.1~bzr25-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:15:42 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397059: fixed in libbuilder-ruby 2.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:10:31 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386102: fixed in javassist 3.4.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:05:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392721: fixed in pyecm 1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 17:58:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413522: fixed in plexus-container-default 1.0+svn6351-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 17:56:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421573: fixed in ldb 0.9.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 17:44:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419474: fixed in mythtvfs-fuse 0.5.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 17:38:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#201761: fixed in mummer 3.19-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 17:27:52 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390418: fixed in libserialport-ruby 0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 238904
Bug#238904: ITP: libcommons-vfs-java -- single Java API for accessing various
different file systems
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> owner 238904 !
Bug#238904: ITP: libcommons-vfs-java -- single Java API for accessing various
di
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 422601 !
Bug#422601: ITP: jsr107cache -- Java API for caching
Owner recorded as "Arnaud Vandyck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 305228
Bug#305228: RFP: libxsd-java -- the Sun XML Datatypes Library
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.
> owner 305228 !
Bug#305228: RFP: libxsd-java -- the Sun XML Datatypes Library
Bug#296643: RFP: libxsd-java -- the Sun XML Datatypes Library
reopen 305228
owner 305228 !
thanks
According to https://msv.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
the author claim the software if under BSD license.
I'll take care of it
--
Arnaud Vandyck
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Fri May 11 17:13, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>
> > I have packaging for this now at
> > http://mjj29.matthew.ath.cx/fretsonfire-data-sectoid.debian.tar.gz,
> > which includes a get-orig-source target to create the source tarball.
> > I've also updated the fretsonfire packaging in svn to depend on it. I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 352521 ITA: aspectj -- A seamless aspect-oriented extension for Java
Bug#352521: O: aspectj -- A seamless aspect-oriented extension for Java
Changed Bug title to ITA: aspectj -- A seamless aspect-oriented extension for
Java from O: aspectj -- A
retitle 352521 ITA: aspectj -- A seamless aspect-oriented extension for Java
owner 352521 !
thanks
Hello,
I intend to adopt aspectj. The package will be handled by the
pkg-java team.
It will probably move to main, as gcj seems to be able to compile it.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:59:41 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422367: fixed in kbuild 893-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:54:59 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416929: fixed in perl-doc-html 5.8.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:51:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419447: fixed in tclgeoip 0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:45:45 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413820: fixed in pam-krb5-migrate 0.0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:44:24 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374061: fixed in nautilus-image-converter 0.0.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:45:45 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413820: fixed in pam-krb5-migrate 0.0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:39:40 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422119: fixed in ripole 0.2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:41:43 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420199: fixed in libpam-usb 0.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:42:43 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420410: fixed in libdevel-size-perl 0.66-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
The URL of xdg-user-dirs has changed to
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xdg-user-dirs and the current
version is 0.6. Any updates on the debian packaging process?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:30:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416159: fixed in gurgitate-mail 1.8.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:22:35 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390691: fixed in human-icon-theme 0.18-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:26:35 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419573: fixed in ois 0.99+1.0rc1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:21:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421975: fixed in xfce4-xkb-plugin 0.4.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:14:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421819: fixed in slxfig 0~svn.114-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:09:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417500: fixed in zope-managableindex 1.6.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
--- Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Fri May 11 11:20, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> > In terms of packaging, we probably want to have them as a separate
> > source package (I think), which produces a binary package which
> > fretsonfire depends on. Something like fretsonfire-data-se
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:07:31 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417365: fixed in zope-advancedquery 2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:10:16 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417514: fixed in zope-ofolder 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
For the Frets on Fire arcade game which we are packaging I have found an
original artist willing to licence his works under the MIT licence. Four
of the five songs are completely original works; the fifth, however,
whilst being an original composition is inspired by another song. The
email I have f
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:05:58 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415128: fixed in telepathy-mission-control 4.21-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Excellent. Packaging updated to use this link. It still needs
repackaging to a tarball, but it's just a straight copy now. I shall
have a look at fonts tonight, but we might be good to go.
I shall also forward the question about the derivative song to
debian-legal.
Matt
- Forwarded message f
On Fri May 11 11:20, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> In terms of packaging, we probably want to have them as a separate
> source package (I think), which produces a binary package which
> fretsonfire depends on. Something like fretsonfire-data-sectoid? We
> could then have fretsonfire-data-inkila in non-f
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 14:12:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416568: fixed in consolekit 0.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 14:14:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415207: fixed in qtractor 0.0.1.586-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 14:10:39 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405441: fixed in smc 0.99.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 14:08:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410694: fixed in turbomail 2.0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 14:04:53 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326930: fixed in swfmill 0.2.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 13:56:44 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421608: fixed in libcompress-raw-zlib-perl 2.004-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 13:34:35 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420581: fixed in libjflac-java 1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 13:28:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419866: fixed in libajaxtags-java 1.2~beta3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 13:23:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403123: fixed in dreamchess 0.1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 13:25:48 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415802: fixed in jcal 0.1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 13:21:16 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421295: fixed in ditrack 0.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 12:50:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421107: fixed in torbutton 1.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: getstream
Version : 20070419
Upstream Author : Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://silicon-verl.de/home/flo/projects/streaming/
License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : DVB streaming
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 12:38:29 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419748: fixed in libvte-java 0.12.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 12:42:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408066: fixed in nanoblogger-extra 3.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 407640 RM: xed -- RoM
Bug#407640: O: xed -- The standard text editor, for X
Changed Bug title to RM: xed -- RoM from O: xed -- The standard text editor,
for X.
> reassign 407640 ftp.debian.org
Bug#407640: RM: xed -- RoM
Bug reassigned from pac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 311214 pending
Bug#311214: ITP: auditd -- User space tools for 2.6 kernel SELinux auditing
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 418517 pending
Bug#418517: ITP: gnunet-qt -- QT
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libcrcanvas
Version : 0.12
Upstream Author : Robert Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://geocanvas.sourceforge.net/crcanvas/index.html
* License : GPL
Programmi
Excellent, it looks like we'll get some songs we can ship. For
reference, his songs are listed here:
http://www.keyboardsonfire.net/?songs under 'Sectoid'. They are all very
good.
In terms of packaging, we probably want to have them as a separate
source package (I think), which produces a binary p
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:11:23AM +0200, arno wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > I looked at your GPG key. However, it does not appear to be signed by a
> > Debian developer. Are you able to get your key signed? By your email
> > it looks like you are in France. There are quite a few ke
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm looking for co-maintainer of poppler to help with transition to
poppler 0.5. It's bit problematic, since there is internal library with
non-changing SONAME, which means we will need to switch to Debian
SONAMEs, since there are some applications which uses t
Christian Hammers píše v St 02. 05. 2007 v 19:37 +0200:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello
>
> I'm looking for a co-maintainer as a holiday and illness backup for
> the package quagga which is quite easy to maintain and does not need
> much work.
Hi Christian,
since I am much involved
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> I looked at your GPG key. However, it does not appear to be signed by a
> Debian developer. Are you able to get your key signed? By your email
> it looks like you are in France. There are quite a few keysigning
> offers there: https://nm.debian.org/gpg_offer.php
Hi
84 matches
Mail list logo
