Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2007 04:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453669: fixed in xsel 0.9.6-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package wnpp
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wnpp
> retitle 448724 ITA: imsniff -- Simple program to log Instant Messaging
Bug#448724: O: imsniff -- Simple program to log Instant Messaging activity on
the network
Changed Bug title to `ITA: imsniff -- S
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #RFC isn't a *valid* identifier for WNPP bugs, so I'm picking the one that
> # seems to fit the best
> retitle 445290 RFP: newlib-source -- newlib library source package
Bug#445290: RFC: newlib-source
Changed Bug title to `RFP: newlib-source -- newlib l
reassign 266305 ftp.debian.org
retitle 266305 RM: gtktalog -- RoQA; orphaned, unmaintained upstream.
thanks
Hi,
I'm requesting the removal of this orphaned (since 2004) package.
Removal was already suggested in 2006. Someone says that gwhere is a
better alternative, packaged in Debian.
--
| Luc
severity 156532 serious
thanks
Hi,
The "swedish" package has been orphaned for a very long time now (in
fact, it's one of the oldest orphaned packages in Debian). I'm going
through such packages, if see if they can be safely removed from Debian,
since noone seems to care about them.
You are rece
severity 195969 serious
thanks
Hi,
The libzvt package has been orphaned for a very long time now (in
fact, it's one of the oldest orphaned packages in Debian). I'm going
through such packages, to see if they can be safely removed from Debian,
since noone seems to care about them.
You are receivi
severity 180060 serious
thanks
Hi,
The xgsmlib package has been orphaned for a very long time now (in
fact, it's one of the oldest orphaned packages in Debian). I'm going
through such packages, to see if they can be safely removed from Debian,
since noone seems to care about them.
You are receiv
Your message dated Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:28:07 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fwd: Bug#453874 closed by Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> (Bug#453874: fixed)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 266305 ftp.debian.org
Bug#266305: O: gtktalog -- Disk catalog
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 266305 RM: gtktalog -- RoQA; orphaned, unmaintained upstream.
Bug#266305: O: gtktalog -- Disk catalog
Changed Bug t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 156532 serious
Bug#156532: O: swedish -- The Swedish dictionary for ispell.
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 180060 serious
Bug#180060: O: xgsmlib -- Gnome application to handle mobile phone's phone book
and SMS
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 195969 serious
Bug#195969: O: libzvt -- The GNOME 2 zvt (zterm) widget
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 452750 RFP: icedtea -- Java runtime based on OpenJD
Bug#452750: RFP: icedtea: Java runtime based on OpenJDK
Changed Bug title to `RFP: icedtea -- Java runtime based on OpenJD' from `RFP:
icedtea: Java runtime based on OpenJDK'.
> thanks
Stoppi
>> please provide a newlib-source package to make it possible to build
>> toolchains for weird architectures at buildtime, without the need to
>> ship the newlib source again.
>> Priority: optional would probably be good for such a package.
>>
>
> I don't agree. newlib-source package doesn't have
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 445290 wnpp
Bug#445290: newlib: please provide a newlib-source package
Bug reassigned from package `newlib-m68hc1x' to `wnpp'.
> retitle 445290 RFC: newlib-source
Bug#445290: newlib: please provide a newlib-source package
Changed Bug title to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 427789 pending
Bug#427789: ntfsprogs: /usr/bin/ntfsdecrypt is a libtool wrapper, not a real
binary
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 437893 pending
Bug#437893: 'man ntfsmou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@connexer.com
my mother the car
-Original Message-
From: dann frazier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 3, 2007 2:48 PM
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Bug#454200: O: systemconfigurator -- Unified Configuration API
for Linux Installation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@connexer.com
-Original Message-
From: dann frazier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 3, 2007 3:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PM
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Bug#454201: O: systeminstaller -- Creates Linux distribution
images from a set of packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 391473 !
Bug#391473: ITA: systemimager -- Automate GNU/Linux installs and upgrades over
a network
Owner recorded as Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> owner 454200 !
Bug#454200: ITA: systemconfigurator -- Unified Configuration API for Li
El lun, 03-12-2007 a las 03:35 +, Chris Lamb escribió:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure what to do in this position. I am equally enthusiastic
> about adopting this package by myself as well as co-maintaining it with
> Gerado but he appears to be seriously MIA.
Hi Chris.
I've w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 391473 ITA: systemimager -- Automate GNU/Linux installs and upgrades
> over a network
Bug#391473: O: systemimager -- Automate GNU/Linux installs and upgrades over a
network
Changed Bug title to `ITA: systemimager -- Automate GNU/Linux installs
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the systeminstaller package.
The package description is:
SystemInstaller creates Linux distribution images from a set of packages and
specification files. Working in conjunction with SystemImager and
SystemConfigurator, these images can then b
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the systemconfigurator package.
The package description is:
Provides an API for various installation and configuration processes that are
otherwise inconsistent between the many Linux distributions, and the many
architectures they run on. For
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 401134 O: klineakconfig -- KDE configurator for lineakd
Bug#401134: ITA: klineakconfig -- KDE configurator for lineakd
Changed Bug title to `O: klineakconfig -- KDE configurator for lineakd' from
`ITA: klineakconfig -- KDE configurator for line
retitle 401134 O: klineakconfig -- KDE configurator for lineakd
noowner 401134
stop
Sorry, I really shouldn't have taken this in the first place. I don't
use KDE, and haven't been using lineakd itself since I switched to
gnome exclusively (right around the same time lineak was orphaned).
Ryan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 453680 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453680: ITP: djbdns -- Replacement for BIND, written by Dan Bernstein
Owner changed from "robert s. edmonds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> owner 453684 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453684: ITP: daemontools -- A
owner 453680 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
owner 453684 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Hi, after maintaining binary packages of djbdns and co. unofficially
> since more than six years through http://smarden.org/pape/Debian/, I'd
> be interested in maintaining them through the Debian archive in
Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Thanks for your patch, but everything was already fixed in the unstable
branch :)
ok, my bad. got the experimental branch URL from an old post on the
soylent ML and just started working with that. Is there any repos where
you guys drop your .debs ?
After trying it ou
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: brad
Version : 0.2_2007-01-08
Upstream Author : Francesco Anselmo
* URL : https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/brad/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Descriptio
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:22:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453149: fixed in libxstream-java 1.2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:20:43 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431997: fixed in libjoda-time-java 1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:45:37 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#25: fixed in libdbi-drivers 0.8.2-1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:45:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#24: fixed in libdbi 0.8.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:16:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453184: fixed in libezmorph-java 1.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 444221 RFP: python-pysizer -- memory profiiler for Python
Bug#444221: RTP: python-pysizer -- memory profiiler for Python
Changed Bug title to `RFP: python-pysizer -- memory profiiler for Python' from
`RTP: python-pysizer -- memory profiiler for
retitle 444221 RTP: python-pysizer -- memory profiiler for Python
noowner 444221
thanks
Hi,
unfortunately, I do not think I get around to package pysizer too soon.
If anyone else wants to do it, please do go ahead.
If you cannot upload yourself, I can sponsor an upload if your packages
are done
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 444221 RTP: python-pysizer -- memory profiiler for Python
Bug#444221: ITP: python-pysizer -- memory profiiler for Python
Changed Bug title to `RTP: python-pysizer -- memory profiiler for Python' from
`ITP: python-pysizer -- memory profiiler for
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:19:50 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453111: fixed in libjettison-java 1.0~RC2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> retitle 452750 RFP: icedtea: Java runtime based on OpenJDK
Bug#452750: ITP: icedtea -- icedtea: Java runtime based on OpenJDK
Changed Bug title to `RFP: icedtea: Java runtime based o
Hi,
Thanks for your patch, but everything was already fixed in the unstable
branch :)
http://bzr.debian.org/pkg-telepathy/packages/unstable/soylent/
Regards
Laurent Bigonville
pgpnq8z3IZSOC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:14:52 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452943: fixed in php-openid 2.0.0~rc5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi!
Some people have asked me about my upload of the last version of swfdec.
I have set myself as uploader right now, and I plan to adopt it and will set
myself as maintainer on my next upload which I'll do after I clean up some
warnings on the linking of the package.
I take seriously a package
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:19:38 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453099: fixed in libnova 0.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
We are Looking for partners worldwide. The position is home-based. Our Company
Head Office is located in UK with branches all over the world. We are looking
for talented, honest, reliable representatives from different regions. The
ideal candidate will be an intelligent person, someone who can
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:16:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452980: fixed in ttf-ocr-a 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
You don't necessarily need ocaml-csv to compile virt-top. If you don't
have it you'll lose a bit of functionality (basically all the --csv
command line options) but it will still compile and run.
Another thing to note is the Debian OCaml packaging policy:
http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 423322 ITA: swi-prolog -- Prolog interpreter
Bug#423322: O: swi-prolog -- Prolog interpreter
Changed Bug title to `ITA: swi-prolog -- Prolog interpreter' from `O:
swi-prolog -- Prolog interpreter'.
> retitle 454148 ITA: swi-prolog-doc -- Docum
retitle 423322 ITA: swi-prolog -- Prolog interpreter
retitle 454148 ITA: swi-prolog-doc -- Documentation for SWI-Prolog interpreter
thanks
As per my previous emails, I wish to adopt this package. My upload is pending
sponsor approval.
/Lamby
--
Chris Lamb, UK
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 423322 normal
Bug#423322: swi-prolog: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign 423322 wnpp
Bug#423322: swi-prolog: should this package be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `swi-prolog' to `wnpp'.
Hello kickass telepathy maintainers,
the attached patch against the current packaging in bzr makes the
soylent package build in version 0.1.2. Please merge as appropriate.
Thank you for your work,
Philipp
# Bazaar merge directive format 2 (Bazaar 0.90)
# revision_id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# u
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libdbix-class-htmlwidget-perl
Version : 0.11
Upstream Author : Thomas Klausner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~andremar/DBIx-Class-HTMLWidget/
* License
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
retitle 414533 ITA: clanlib -- JPEG module for ClanLib game SDK
# http://wiki.debian.org/Games for info on the team
owner 414533 Debian Games Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382026: fixed in apt-show-versions 0.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> retitle 414533 ITA: clanlib -- JPEG module for ClanLib game SDK
Bug#414533: O: clanlib -- JPEG module for ClanLib game SDK
Changed Bug title to `ITA: clanlib -- JPEG module for ClanL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 422158 pending
Bug#422158: ITP: podsleuth -- HAL callout to merge rich iPod device metadata in
the device tree
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 445831 pending
Bug#445831:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:24:48AM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> * Package name: djbdns
> Version : 1.05
Hi, after maintaining binary packages of djbdns and co. unofficially
since more than six years through http://smarden.org/pape/Debian/, I'd
be interested in maintaining them thro
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 10:27:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ITP: gio-standalone -- GObject based IO abstraction layer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
57 matches
Mail list logo
