Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anibal Avelar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: potamus
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Adam Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://offog.org/code/potamus.html
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C, GTK
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anibal Avelar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: bio2jack
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Chris Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://bio2jack.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C
Description
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 428485 447220
Bug#428485: O: gnome-breakout -- Clone of the classic game Breakout, written
for GNOME
Bug#447220: ITA: gnome-breakout -- Clone of the classic game Breakout, written
for GNOME
Merged 428485 447220.
> Thank you
Stopping processing
Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:13:53 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed with other upload. New maintainer is Debian Games Team
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Oliver Gorwits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: netdisco-mibs-installer
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-maint/ext-maint/netdisco-mibs-installer
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
biomode is looking for a new loving and caring maintainer.
I dont have any use for it, so I feel I do a very poor
job of "maintaining" it.
--
CYa,
Mario | Debian Developer http://debian.org/>
.''`. | Get my public key via finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' : | 102
Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:39:45 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404059: fixed in gpe-conf 0.2.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:37:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#451355: fixed in libgfshare 1.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:22:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440359: fixed in ganeti 1.2~b3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:38:38 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404381: fixed in gpe-mixer 0.42-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:40:44 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404083: fixed in gpe-appmgr 2.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:22:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440359: fixed in ganeti 1.2~b3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:40:35 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453301: fixed in gpe-login 0.90-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:40:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404390: fixed in gpe-confd 0.16-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:38:59 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453300: fixed in gpe-ownerinfo 0.28-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: processing
Version : 0.39
Upstream Author : R Oudkerk
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/processing/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : spawning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 441850 pending
Bug#441850: ITP: libhtml-treebuilder-xpath-perl -- typical XPath methods to
HTML::TreeBuilder
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 451975 pending
Bug#451975: IT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 454323 RFA: vim-latexsuite -- view, edit and compile LaTeX documents
> from within Vim
Bug#454323: RFA: vim-latexsuite
Changed Bug title to `RFA: vim-latexsuite -- view, edit and compile LaTeX
documents from within Vim' from `RFA: vim-latexsui
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> retitle 454255 RFP: chkudf -- check correctness of UDF filesystems
Bug#454255: RFP: chkudf - check correctness of UDF filesystems
Changed Bug title to `RFP: chkudf -- check correctnes
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The package is currently maintained under the Package Vim Maintainers
umbrella but there's no one that's really giving it the proper attention
it needs. There are an increasing number of bugs, the scripts are
fairly complex, and upstream doesn't seem to be very act
-Original Message-
From: Tetralet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 4, 2007 5:39 AM
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Bug#454278: O: pcmanfm -- dead upstream
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
* dead upstream. the author has no interest in it over a year.
-- System Informati
-Original Message-
From: Tetralet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 4, 2007 5:39 AM
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Bug#454278: O: pcmanfm -- dead upstream
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
* dead upstream. the author has no interest in it over a year.
-- System Informati
-Original Message-
From: Tetralet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 4, 2007 5:39 AM
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Bug#454278: O: pcmanfm -- dead upstream
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
* dead upstream. the author has no interest in it over a year.
-- System Informati
-Original Message-
From: Tetralet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 4, 2007 5:39 AM
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Bug#454278: O: pcmanfm -- dead upstream
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
* dead upstream. the author has no interest in it over a year.
-- System Informati
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 454255 wnpp
Bug#454255: udftools: udf/tools should be available.
Bug reassigned from package `udftools' to `wnpp'.
> retitle 454255 RFP: chkudf - check correctness of UDF filesystems
Bug#454255: udftools: udf/tools should be available.
Changed
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
* dead upstream. the author has no interest in it over a year.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500,
'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i6
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
* dead upstream. the author has no interest in it over a year.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500,
'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i6
retitle 156532 ITA: swedish -- The Swedish dictionary for ispell.
owner 156532 Jeremiah Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks
I intend to adopt this package and try to get it into good shape
for debian.
Jeremiah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
severity 280028 serious
thanks
Hi,
The "reppu" package has been orphaned for a very long time now (in
fact, it's one of the oldest orphaned packages in Debian). I'm going
through such packages, to see if they can be safely removed from Debian,
since noone seems to care about them.
You are receiv
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 446692 normal
Bug#446692: twin: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign 446692 wnpp
Bug#446692: twin: should this package be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `twin' to `wnpp'.
> retitle 446692
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 254270 pending
Bug#254270: gdb: Enable alternate 64-bit binary build
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 414887 pending
Bug#414887: gdb hangs evaluating simple arithmetic expression
severity 264107 serious
thanks
Hi,
The "dia2code" package has been orphaned for a very long time now (in
fact, it's one of the oldest orphaned packages in Debian). I'm going
through such packages, to see if they can be safely removed from Debian,
since noone seems to care about them.
You are rec
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 264107 serious
Bug#264107: O: dia2code -- a dia-UML code generator
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 280028 serious
Bug#280028: O: reppu -- A network render program for blender
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 423317 ftp.debian.org
Bug#423317: O: ppscsi -- set of drivers for parallel port attached scanners
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 423317 RM: ppscsi -- RoQA; orphaned, mostly useless, RC buggy
Bug#423317: O: pp
reassign 423317 ftp.debian.org
retitle 423317 RM: ppscsi -- RoQA; orphaned, mostly useless, RC buggy
thanks
On 14/10/07 at 21:17 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I don't have regular access to this hardware, and I doubt that enough
> people still use them to justify keeping the package whatsoever. I
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 446664 -1
Bug#446664: inform: should this package be removed?
Bug 446664 cloned as bug 454258.
> reassign -1 wnpp
Bug#454258: inform: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `inform' to `wnpp'.
> severity -1 normal
Bug#454258
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 446667 -1
Bug#446667: supercollider: should this package be removed?
Bug 446667 cloned as bug 454257.
> reassign -1 wnpp
Bug#454257: supercollider: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `supercollider' to `wnpp'.
> severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> retitle 452750 RFP: icedtea -- Java runtime based on OpenJDK
Bug#452750: RFP: icedtea -- Java runtime based on OpenJD
Changed Bug title to `RFP: icedtea -- Java runtime based on OpenJ
39 matches
Mail list logo
