Bug#456456: ITP: unperish -- release and build free software projects

2007-12-15 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: unperish Version : 2.2 Upstream Author : Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://liw.iki.fi/liw/unperish/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: Python Descrip

Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

2007-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 337828 pending Bug#337828: ITP: libjogl-java -- Java bindings for OpenGL There were no tags set. Bug#456177: ITP: libjogl-java -- Java bindings for OpenGL API (java library) Tags added: pendi

Bug#456443: ITP: python-coverage-test-runner -- fail Python program unit tests unless they test everything

2007-12-15 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; report on 2007-12-15 Severity: wishlist * Package name: python-coverage-test-runner * Version: 1.0 * Upstream author: Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL: http://liw.iki.fi/liw/coverage-test-runner/ * License: GPL-2 Description: fail Python program unit tests unle

Bug#456427: ITP: zope-ploneldap -- LDAP integration for Plone

2007-12-15 Thread Mark Hymers
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: zope-ploneldap Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Wichert Akkerman * URL : http://plone.org/products/ploneldap * License : GPLv2 Programming Lang: Python Description : L

Bug#452076: marked as done (ITP: libxmlrpc-light-ocaml-dev -- XmlRpc-Light is an XmlRpc library written in OCaml.)

2007-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:15:39 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#452076: fixed in xmlrpc-light 0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#443133: O: blogtk - GTK Weblogging client

2007-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 443133 RM: blogtk -- RoQA; few users; RC-buggy Bug#443133: O: blogtk -- GTK Weblogging client Changed Bug title to `RM: blogtk -- RoQA; few users; RC-buggy' from `O: blogtk -- GTK Weblogging client'. > reassign 443133 ftp.debian.org Bug#443133

Bug#443133: O: blogtk - GTK Weblogging client

2007-12-15 Thread Philipp Kern
retitle 443133 RM: blogtk -- RoQA; few users; RC-buggy reassign 443133 ftp.debian.org thanks On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:04:45PM -0500, Diego Andrés Sanabria Martin (diegueus9) wrote: > This software is don't in development anymore. Additionally this package is RC-buggy (#362828 and #389837) and c

Bug#454804: marked as done (ITP: whirlpool -- hash algorithm based on AES)

2007-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:24:39 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#454804: fixed in whirlpool 1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#382815: marked as done (ITA: groovy -- Agile dynamic language for the Java Virtual)

2007-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#382815: fixed in groovy 1.5.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Re: Can I reinstall removed package?

2007-12-15 Thread Daniel Baumann
OHURA Makoto wrote: What should I do? Only what I should do is uploading new package? just upload as normal. due to the already happened removal, the package will have to go through NEW. besides from that, everything is normal. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562

Can I reinstall removed package?

2007-12-15 Thread OHURA Makoto
Hi, all. I want to take over the package which has already removed from unstable, tex-guy[1]. This was orphaned last year[2], but there was no enough time to take over it at that time. I have already prepared new revision. What should I do? Only what I should do is uploading new package?

Bug#295579: any news on ITA: docbook-defguide ?

2007-12-15 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Sonntag, den 09.12.2007, 15:39 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: [docbook-defguide ITA] > Have you made some progress on this stuff? Ok, so this is JFTR. After a long night, most of the work is done (maybe around 70%): http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-xml-sgml/packages/docbook-defguide/trunk/?rev

Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

2007-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 430543 pending Bug#430543: ITP: herrie -- command line music player There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 451613 pending Bug#451613: libswt-gtk-3.3-jni: libswt-cairo-gtk-3346.so

Processed: fixing wnpp bugs

2007-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > #RFP with owner, looks like an ITP > retitle 418889 ITP: nouveau -- an Open Source 3D drivers for nVidia cards Bug#418889: RFP: nouveau -- an Open Source 3D drivers for nVidia cards Changed Bug title to `ITP: nouveau -- an Open Source 3D drivers for nVi

Processed: ITA: xml2

2007-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 455008 ITA: xml2 -- Convert between XML, HTML, CSV and a line-oriented Bug#455008: O: xml2 -- Convert between XML, HTML, CSV and a line-oriented format Changed Bug title to `ITA: xml2 -- Convert between XML, HTML, CSV and a line-oriented' from