Sebastien Delafond dijo [Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:17:09PM -0700]:
> On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports
> > both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1
> > still be needed ?
>
> As I said in my other mail, f
Sebastien Delafond dijo [Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:59:00PM -0700]:
> On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
> > important for jruby...
>
> to have 2 versions of jruby available ? I guess so you can at least, for
> instance, try the new
Your email ID has been awarded 750,000,00 GBP in our recent Siemens
draw,Contact this office with your full information as given below:
Name:...Country:...Sex:...Age: ..Address:...
Regards,
Mrs. Joan Bill
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
I'm working again on this ITP.
I have uploaded some depends:
* python-netifaces
* p910nd
I'm waiting these bugs (not critical for TCOS):
* #523034
* #454478 (fixed in NEW)
Roadmap:
http://wiki.tcosproject.org/Tcos_Into_Debian
GIT:
http://tcosproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/initramfs-too
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 495125 ITA: afbackup -- Client-Server Backup System
Bug#495125: O: afbackup -- Client-Server Backup System
Changed Bug title to `ITA: afbackup -- Client-Server Backup System' from `O:
afbackup -- Client-Server Backup System'.
>
End of me
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:17:09PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports
> > both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1
> > still be needed ?
>
> As I said in my other mail
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports
> both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1
> still be needed ?
As I said in my other mail, for transition reasons;
backward-compatibility is something many people like t
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:40:54PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> On Apr/07, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > The question was, rather: why would a user want to install jruby1.0 or
> > jruby1.1 instead of jruby1.2? What purpose does it serve having three
> > different versions in the archive instead of
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
> important for jruby...
to have 2 versions of jruby available ? I guess so you can at least, for
instance, try the new one on your existing jruby code without removing
the old one, for instance ?
On Apr/07, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> The question was, rather: why would a user want to install jruby1.0 or
> jruby1.1 instead of jruby1.2? What purpose does it serve having three
> different versions in the archive instead of one, or two at most?
jruby1.0 will indeed be removed shortly from the arch
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Why do we need jruby1.0, jruby1.1 and now jruby1.2 ?
so multiple versions of jruby can be simultaneously installed on a
system, like with python2.x, ruby1.x, etc ?
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
+ Sebastien Delafond (Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:08:17 -0700):
> On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Why do we need jruby1.0, jruby1.1 and now jruby1.2 ?
> so multiple versions of jruby can be simultaneously installed on a
> system, like with python2.x, ruby1.x, etc ?
The question was, rather: why would
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: ohcount
Version: 2.0.1
Upstream Author: Ohloh
URL: http://labs.ohloh.net/ohcount
License: GPL
Description: Source code line counter
Ohcount supports over 70 popular progra
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:09:56PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Sebastien Delafond
>
>
>
> * Package name: jruby1.2
> Version : 1.2.0
> Upstream Author : The JRuby Team
> * URL : http://jruby.codehaus.org/
> * License
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Tue Apr 7 20:03:37 UTC 2009
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: dans-gdal-scripts
> tags 521182 + pending
Bug#521182: ITP: dans-gdal-scripts --
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond
* Package name: jruby1.2
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : The JRuby Team
* URL : http://jruby.codehaus.org/
* License : tri-license CPL/GPL/LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : 100% pure
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: magics++
Version : 2.6.4
Upstream Author : ECMWF
* URL : http://www.ecmwf.int/products/data/software/magics++.html
* License : Apache license, version 2.
Programming Lang: C, Fortran
Hi Nico,
Nico Golde writes:
> What is the reason for orphaning it? I might be interested in
> taking it over.
The main reason is that I don't use it anymore, Scapy is more
flexible and implemented as a Python extension, so I use that.
Note that upstream-wise hping is pretty much dead (but it's
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libtomcrypt
Version : 0.0.116 but probably a .a only
Upstream Author : Tom St Denis
* URL : http://libtomcrypt.com/download.html
* License : public domain
Programming Lang: C
Description : a crypographic
Your message dated Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:47:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#522797: fixed in i8kutils 1.29
has caused the Debian Bug report #522797,
regarding ITA: i8kutils -- utilities for Dell Inspiron and Latitude laptops
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Hi,
* Romain Francoise [2009-04-07 10:03]:
> I intend to orphan the hping3 package.
>
> The package description is:
> hping3 is a network tool able to send custom ICMP/UDP/TCP packets and
> to display target replies like ping does with ICMP replies. It handles
> fragmentation and arbitrary pac
Licensed MDs in the USA
788,318 in total <> 17,403 emails
MDs in many different specialties
Can easily be sorted by 16 different fields
Reduced to only: $393
=== Get These Fr EE with every order this week ===
==> American Pharmaceutical Company List
Personal email addresses (47,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Watkins
* Package name: python-whoosh
Version : 0.1.13
Upstream Author : Matt Chaput
* URL : http://whoosh.ca
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Python
Description : pure-Python full-text indexing, searc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: emerald
Version : 0.8.2
Upstream Author : David Reveman , Quinnstorm
* URL : http://releases.compiz.org/components/emerald/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Window Decorator shipped with
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Iain Lane
* Package name: agda-stdlib
Version : unreleased
Upstream Author : Nils Anders Danielsson
* URL :
http://wiki.portal.chalmers.se/agda/agda.php?n=Libraries.StandardLibrary
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva"
* Package name: haskell-ifelse
Version : 0.85
Upstream Author : Jeff R. Heard and Wren Thornton
* URL :
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/IfElse
* License : BSD
P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Iain Lane
* Package name: agda
Version : 2.2.0
Upstream Author : Ulf Norell
* URL : http://wiki.portal.chalmers.se/agda/
* License : MIT/X11
Programming Lang: Haskell
Description : a dependently typed functional
You're not right; there is some tricks in README file that shows all
MakeFile targets available:
$ make bogo586
gcc -g -O3 -Wall -c -o bogomips.o bogomips.c
gcc -g -O3 -Wall -c -o delay_586.o delay_586.c
gcc -g -O3 -Wall bogomips.o delay_586.o -o bogo586
$ ./bogo586
Calibrating delay loop...
beyond that very limited zx-spectrum emulator still is Spectemu at
Debian repository, it seems someone made .deb packages of Fuse
zx-spectrum emulator, which seems to be a really complete emulator
(emulates even those newer kit-based russian hardware, like Pentagon
1024, i think)
http://people.iga
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 522298 ITP: truncate -- truncate files
Bug#522298: RFP: truncate -- truncate files
Changed Bug title to `ITP: truncate -- truncate files' from `RFP: truncate --
truncate files'.
> owner 522298 !
Bug 522298 [wnpp] ITP: truncate -- truncat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 510447 ITP: usbmon -- A basic front-end to usbmon
Bug#510447: RFP: usbmon -- A basic front-end to usbmon
Changed Bug title to `ITP: usbmon -- A basic front-end to usbmon' from `RFP:
usbmon -- A basic front-end to usbmon'.
> owner 510447
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 506251 Alessandro Scarozza
Bug 506251 [wnpp] ITP: amule-adunanza -- client for the eD2k and Kadu networks
for for Fastweb clients
Owner changed from Luca Falavigna to Alessandro Scarozza
.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Hi,
a Debian Science task meteorology comes to mind ...
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: CDO
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author : Uwe Schulzweida uwe.schulzwe..
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Tue Apr 7 08:03:14 UTC 2009
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: cdo
> tags 522722 + pending
Bug#522722: (/usr/lib/cups/filter/pstopdf) stopped w
Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> I think someone is working on getting iniparse into debian
> http://code.google.com/p/iniparse/issues/detail?id=14&can=1
>
> It is used instead of the standard ConfigParser, because the it
> preserves the order, comments and formatting of the ini files, when
> written back t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Pleae package an improve virtual keyboard
* Package name: vmpk
Version : 0.4.2
Upstream Author : Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
* URL : http://vmpk.sourceforge.net/#Installation/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:23:07AM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> > The idea would be to gather more data under the same source package and
> > split it into binaries as needed,
>
> Okay, I have no objections if it's just the source package with that name.
>
> > can you point to more IEEE da
Certified Doctors in the US
788,513 in total <> 17,387 emails
Lots of Doctors in specialties like Orthopedics, Surgery, Radiology,
Dermatology, Neurology, General Practice etc..
16 different sortable fields
Cost just slashed - $397
<><><> Receive the items below as a Bon.US if you order
38 matches
Mail list logo
