I'm basically Ccing half the world in this (only half sorry about that :) and I
don't know who half
of you are :), but there have been very little information on what's happening
with ZoL in Debian
GNU/Linux.
Aron (and in some part Carlos) seems to have gone a-wall and the list have been
VERY q
On 27/02/14 21:38, Florian Schlichting wrote:
I'm in the process of packaging PerlIO::utf8_strict for Debian. The
module includes in its CPAN distribution a 2010 copy of the file
quickbrown.txt, very similar to the one you make available at
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/examples/quickbrown.t
Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:00:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#730299: fixed in tryton-modules-sale-invoice-grouping
3.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #730299,
regarding ITP: tryton-modules-sale-invoice-grouping -- Sale Invoice Grouping
Module for the Tryton Appli
Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:00:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#730302: fixed in tryton-modules-account-dunning-letter
3.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #730302,
regarding ITP: tryton-modules-account-dunning-letter -- Account Dunning Letter
Module for the Tryton Ap
Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:00:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#730298: fixed in tryton-modules-bank 3.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #730298,
regarding ITP: tryton-modules-bank -- Bank Module for the Tryton Application
Platform
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:00:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#730301: fixed in tryton-modules-account-dunning 3.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #730301,
regarding ITP: tryton-modules-account-dunning -- Account Dunning Module for the
Tryton Application Platform
to
Hello,
On 28 February 2014 09:30, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> I'm basically Ccing half the world in this (only half sorry about that :) and
> I don't know who half
> of you are :), but there have been very little information on what's
> happening with ZoL in Debian
> GNU/Linux.
>
> Aron (and in
> Where is the latest/greatest set of packaging repositories and/or packages to
> look at?
For Debian GNU/Linux Wheezy, this would be
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/pkg-zfs/tree/master/debian/wheezy/0.6.3-0.8_g540ce4_wheezy
I'm not sure which tag is the latest for Ubuntu (I'm a little u
Control: owner -1 t...@coldtobi.de
Setting myself as owner.
Thanks to Lemos for his efforts so far!
Best regards,
Tobias Frost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists
Processing control commands:
> owner -1 t...@coldtobi.de
Bug #730426 [wnpp] ITP: gmediarender -- UPnP Media renderer
Owner changed from Rodrigo Lemos to t...@coldtobi.de.
--
730426: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730426
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 731762 RFP: lessphp -- compiler for LESS written in PHP
Bug #731762 [wnpp] ITP: lessphp -- compiler for LESS written in PHP
Changed Bug title to 'RFP: lessphp -- compiler for LESS written in PHP' from
'ITP: lessphp -- compiler for LESS wr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> noowner 731762
Bug #731762 [wnpp] RFP: lessphp -- compiler for LESS written in PHP
Removed annotation that Bug was owned by mid...@debian.org.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
731762: http://bugs.de
On Feb 28, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
>> Where is the latest/greatest set of packaging repositories and/or packages
>> to look at?
>
> For Debian GNU/Linux Wheezy, this would be
>
>
> https://github.com/zfsonlinux/pkg-zfs/tree/master/debian/wheezy/0.6.3-0.8_g540ce4_wheez
On 28/02/2014 10:20, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 28 February 2014 09:30, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
>> I'm basically Ccing half the world in this (only half sorry about that :)
>> and I don't know who half
>> of you are :), but there have been very little information on what's
>> h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 677761 ITA: powerpc-ibm-utils -- maintenance of IBM PowerPC
Bug #677761 [wnpp] O: powerpc-ibm-utils -- maintenance of IBM PowerPC
Changed Bug title to 'ITA: powerpc-ibm-utils -- maintenance of IBM PowerPC'
from 'O: powerpc-ibm-utils -- ma
On 28/02/14 10:30, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> I'm basically Ccing half the world in this (only half sorry about that :) and
> I don't know who half
> of you are :), but there have been very little information on what's
> happening with ZoL in Debian
> GNU/Linux.
>
> Aron (and in some part Carlos
Hi Dominique,
I think the open issues should be fixed now. Could you please have a
look and upload if appropriate?
Best,
Axel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.
On Feb 28, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> The proposed package is poorly integrated with existing ZFS packages (e.g.
> zfsutils for native
> kFreeBSD support).
>
> First and foremost, there's a namespace grab which is likely to result in
> trouble, as I explained
> last November (and
Chris Knadle writes ("ITA: mumble -- Low latency VoIP client"):
> Ron -- I believe the BTS and PTS likely didn't notify you via email, so I
> wanted to let you know that I filed an ITA [1] on the mumble package
> yesterday.
>
> I'm open to discussing this if your or anyone wishes to.
Ah, good,
Chris Knadle writes ("Bug#739997: ITA: mumble -- Low latency VoIP client"):
...
> This package hasn't been orphaned, but there hasn't been any
> activity from the maintainer or uploader for ~18 months despite some
> grave bugs, so I'm offering to adopt the package as the maintainer.
> I'm familiar
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Is it ok/allowed to upload a new package, even though the initial one is
> still stuck in incoming?
yes!
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Senior Research Associate, Psychol
On 02/28/2014 04:13 PM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Is it ok/allowed to upload a new package, even though the initial one is
> still stuck in incoming?
I suggest asking the FTP masters to mark the package as REJECT if you
want to change something again. As long the package is still stuck
in NEW (n
On Feb 28, 2014, at 5:23 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I suggest asking the FTP masters to mark the package as REJECT if you
> want to change something again.
Well, regarding the packaging, a lot have happened since this summer. And this
is also true with the
code itself.
But doing a R
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 05:25:15PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> FTP maintainers inability to verify that there is no licensing issue.
Your tone is not appreciated nor helpful.
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 8
On 28/02/14 17:23, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 02/28/2014 04:13 PM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
>> Is it ok/allowed to upload a new package, even though the initial one is
>> still stuck in incoming?
>
> I suggest asking the FTP masters to mark the package as REJECT if you
> want to change
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 09:51:31AM +, Markus Kuhn wrote:
> I would be happy to release any copyright that I might share in this
> file under e.g. a Creative Commons Attribution licence, but I
> am not confident that Creative Commons is suitable for a compilation
> of samples. I am not even sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/28/2014 05:37 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> I advise against this. The upload is to experimental, is OK if the
> package has RC bugs.
Why? If the maintainer has made some changes in the meantime while the
package has been waiting in
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 02/28/2014 05:37 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> > I advise against this. The upload is to experimental, is OK if the
> > package has RC bugs.
> Why? If the maintainer has made some changes in the meantime while the
> package ha
On 28/02/14 17:58, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> > However, I will wait for a resolution from ftp-master before
>> > resuming my work on the package, because there is the possibility
>> > of ftp-master not allowing the upload and I don't like to waste my
>> > time.
> Just because your package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jacob Appelbaum
* Package name: liborchid-java
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Bruce Leidl
* URL : http://www.subgraph.com/orchid.html
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Orchid is a Tor client i
[Hrafnkell Eiriksson 2013-11-03]
> I doubt I have time to do this in the near future.
> Thanks for asking. I've forwarded this to Bjarni Runar Einarsson, the
> author of PageKite.
Right. I hope someone find time to look at it soon. :)
I've had a look at the packages linked to from
https://pageki
Hello all. My name is Ender, I have been a Debian developer for quite
some
time and I work for Facebook, so I decided to do proper packaging of hhvm in
Alioth, as having this done properly is a goal for the team in the first part of
the year.
I've read the entire thread to become
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "gustavo panizzo "
* Package name: asciinema
Version : 0.9.8
Upstream Author : Marcin Kulik
* URL : https://asciinema.org
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Record and share your terminal se
On 28/02/14 15:13, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> It's very flattering that people thought my stuff was good enough to accept
> without further review,
> but it's also a bit frightening - I'm good, but not THAT good (as we could
> see :).
ISTR it was committed to master by mistake? Then reverted, b
Steven Chamberlain (2014-02-28):
> The actually useful bits for Linux were later reverted by KiBi due to
> d-i build issues, but the other changes (including some that are
> problematic for kFreeBSD) are still there.
>
> Perhaps I could undo Turbo's changes in master, and we can later
> carefully
I will sponsor this, no problem.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:42 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "gustavo panizzo "
>
> * Package name: asciinema
> Version : 0.9.8
> Upstream Author : Marcin Kulik
> * URL : https://asciinema.or
Hi,
TLDR: is it possible to run a command as another user using su, if
that user is a system user?
I'm trying to solve bug#739637 by running the command as user
gnuhealth, using the command `su` instead of `sudo`.
Let's take a simple example to start, running the command whoami as
another user,
This library is being packaged.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Pocock
Upstream:
http://concurrencykit.org/
License: BSD
This is a dependency for the latest Ganglia
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #libnet-frame-layer-icmpv6-perl (1.08-1) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * Initial Release. Closes: #740243
> #
> limit package wnpp
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp'
Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp'
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #libnet-frame-layer-ipv6-perl (1.05-1) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * Initial Release. Closes: #740251
> #
> limit package wnpp
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp'
Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp'
> ta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #libnet-frame-simple-perl (1.05-1) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * Initial Release. Closes: #740259
> #
> limit package wnpp
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp'
Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp'
> tags 7
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #libnet-libdnet6-perl (0.26-1) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * Initial Release. Closes: #740263
> #
> limit package wnpp
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp'
Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp'
> tags 74026
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Pyjamas was present in Squeeze, but then removed because a dependency
is obsolete (sugar-hulahop, see
http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pyjamas/news/20130602T094818Z.html).
However, this project is still alive (and now located at
http://pyj.be/), it's under Apa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James McCoy
* Package name: pangoterm
Version : 0~20140228
Upstream Author : Paul Evans
* URL : http://www.leonerd.org.uk/code/pangoterm/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : GTK/Pango-based
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James McCoy
* Package name: libvterm
Version : 0~20140228
Upstream Author : Paul Evans
* URL : http://www.leonerd.org.uk/code/libvterm/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : abstract library
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 723700 by 740390
Bug #723700 [wnpp] ITP: tinyows -- lightweight and fast WFS-T server
723700 was blocked by: 734094
723700 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 723700: 740390
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Hi Ender, all,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:16 PM, David MartÃnez Moreno wrote:
> Hello all. My name is Ender, I have been a Debian developer for
> quite some
> time and I work for Facebook, so I decided to do proper packaging of hhvm in
> Alioth, as having this done properly is a goal for
Package: wnpp
Owner: Takanori Suzuki
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
* Package name: cocot
Version : 0.0.0+20120313
Upstream Author : Takanori Suzuki
* URL : https://github.com/vmi/cocot
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
49 matches
Mail list logo
