Hello Jan,
This would be a great package to have it on Debian,
I usually do a quick review to see if I spot any noticeable issues
before I do a deep dive on it (which I would to during this weekend),
and I notice an issue on d/rules, there are some commands doing:
"test -d foo || git clone bar"
Package: wnpp
The current maintainer of perl-tk, Colin Tuckley ,
has retired. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer,
Package: wnpp
The current maintainer of ltris, Colin Tuckley ,
has retired. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer,
Package: wnpp
The current maintainer of otp, Colin Tuckley ,
has retired. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please
Package: wnpp
The current maintainer of tart, Colin Tuckley ,
has retired. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please
Package: wnpp
The current maintainer of ploticus, Colin Tuckley ,
has retired. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer,
Package: wnpp
The current maintainer of cd-circleprint, Colin Tuckley ,
has retired. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new
Package: wnpp
The current maintainer of brandy, Colin Tuckley ,
has retired. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 565925 ITA: duma -- Detect Unintended Memory Access (D.U.M.A)
Bug #565925 [wnpp] O: duma -- library to detect buffer overruns and under-runs
in C and C++ programs
Changed Bug title to 'ITA: duma -- Detect Unintended Memory Access
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 962686 with 974967
Bug #962686 [wnpp] ITP: s2geometry -- Computational geometry and spatial
indexing on the sphere http://s2geometry.io/
No valid blocking bug(s) given; not doing anything
Failed to set blocking bugs of 962686:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peymaneh Nejad
* Package name: golang-mozilla-pkcs7-dev
Version : 0.0~git20200128.432b235-1
Upstream Author : Mozilla Services
* URL : https://go.mozilla.org/pkcs7
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description
The reason I'm tracking is because I actually use the generated packages.
But I'm totally unfamiliar with the salsa continuous integration
stuff. Wouldn't mind learning though.
Happy to change workflow, maybe do development on a different branch?
Or, could make snapshot upstream releases
Thanks, it helps the salsa pipeline. But it fails right after, because the git
content is too different from the tarball of 1.0.20...
I guess there is no easy way to make this pipeline work before the release of
1.1.0. I tend to think that our issues come from the remote tracking of
upstream's
Done. I reverted to 1.0.20 but left debian/watch untouched, so uscan
alerts about 1.0.20-hotfix being available.
If that's a problem I can edit the watch file, just let me know; I
kind of enjoy tweaking them, as it happens.
Guess now we wait for the actual 1.1.0 release.
I fully agree for not uploading before 1.1.0, so I'd go for the
easiest way to please uscan: probably not -hotfix.
I prefer not to mess with uscan files, as I confess to I kinda dislike
this formalism. But if you insist, I can do.
Mt
--
It is easier to port a shell than a shell script. --
Sure, can change it to 1.0.20-hotfix-1 or can edit debian/watch to
skip the -hotfix tag and change it to 1.0.20-1. Or use 1.0.20-1 and
let uscan whine about 1.0.20-hotfix.
Given the changes all around, I don't think we want to actually push
into Debian until 1.1.0 is released anyway. So whether
16 matches
Mail list logo
