-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 21:27 -0600, Anthony Fok wrote:
> NEW queueOn Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 10:45 PM Brian Thompson
> wrote:
> >
> > Since there is already a package that uses that binary name, who should
> > change it? D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:18:34 -0400 =?utf-8?Q?Antoine_Beaupr=C3=A9?= <
anar...@orangeseeds.org> wrote:
>
> It's not on the package name, but there's already a clash on the
binary
> name, which we should be mindful of:
> gitsome provides direct
On 0814, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>Could also add a Provides: gh so it is installable with the short name.
>
>I would definitely like to have this in Debian, but can't help with it.
>
This would be ideal. Is there any benefit of renaming the package to
something other than "gh"? I can help with this
> I personally find that "gh" is quite short name for a package that
> will go into a general purpose software catalog like Debian repository. Would
> you mind choosing something like "github-cli" as source and binary
> package name and mentioning the sortcut "gh" in a package description?
> So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
retitle -1 ITA: docbook-xsl -- stylesheets for processing DocBook XML
- --
Best regards,
Brian T.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQJHBAEBCgAxFiEE9fpVo96/flopdKOfgw2Ncu3Nhn0FAmEPClETHGJyaWFuQGhh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
retitle -1 ITA: docbook-xml -- standard XML documentation system
- --
Best regards,
Brian T.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQJHBAEBCgAxFiEE9fpVo96/flopdKOfgw2Ncu3Nhn0FAmEPCekTHGJyaWFuQGhh
Is anyone getting the gh CLI tool ready for packaging? If not,
I can adopt it. I use it quite heavily and am fairly familiar
with its development team if I have any questions.
--
Best regards,
Brian
Garie,
TL;DR Use an IDE or text editor on your machine.
Local IDEs/text editors are used to develop the vast, vast majority of
software. Most developers develop on their own machines instead of in
the browser. It doesn't make sense to develop in a browser-based IDE
(at least not yet) since
> While I would love to package this myself, I do not work with
> JavaScript regularally (in part due to ecosystem problems like
> NPM's love of duplication).
I have some experience packaging JavaScript projects and could help you
out here.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:48:48 +0200 Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No Body wrote:
> > Is this package worth adopting or has it been replaced by something
> > else?
>
> There's nothing like it so far AFAIK. apt-src is close, but has a
> different focus (modification instead of compile-time
>Ideally a maintainer willing to help cron move forward would support the next>major task to be done: moving the Debian-specific patches into cronie and >providing an updated package for cronie replacement that can eventually>replace cron. I’d like to help out here if no one else has responded. I
gh time for this work.> @Axel Beckert This is the message I was referring to from “2016”. I would like to adopt this package if no one else has. Best regards, Brian Thompson
12 matches
Mail list logo
