Hi,
FYI - I've uploaded an updated graphviz package based on the latest
2.24.0 upstream version to mentors [1]
I'm interested in possibly adopting the package, but this is the first
library package I've worked on, so before I go ahead I'd like to get
some feedback - is what I've done reasonably c
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:29:34AM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
>> > Heya,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 03:21:58PM +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote:
>>> > > Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > > Thanks for your interest and offering your help! To be honest, I'm
> > > not sure about what needs to
David Claughton wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> (BTW, did you mean bug #504569? That's the one you seem to have fixed!,
> I also notice you haven't committed a changelog update, if you want to
> do this, I'll make sure I merge mine with yours)
>
Apologies, Ana - I see now
retitle 536245 ITA: graphviz -- rich set of graph drawing tools
owner 536245 !
thanks
Hi,
At this point, I would like to formalize my intention to adopt graphviz.
In addition to myself I have been in discussion with Christoph Egger
and Sebastian Harl who have agreed to join me as co-maintainers.
On 25/01/14 14:28, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi all!
>
> Both, tokkee and myself, do not have the time to take care of
> graphviz (even if it's just being available for review and
> sponsoring). David may still be motivated, if so, please speak up!
> Still it's
5 matches
Mail list logo
