Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: thinkingrock
Version : 2.2.x
* URL : http://www.trgtd.com.au/
* License : CDDL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : GTD (Getting Things Done) centric personal organizer
Thinkingrock is a personal
retitle 422298 ITA: libvncserver -- VNC server to monitor a tty
owner 422298 !
thanks
KR,
Filip
--
http://www.sysfs.be/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Yves,
What's the status on xfburn getting added to Debian? You reopened the
ITP after it was closed a few months ago, but without any additional
info.
KR,
Filip
--
http://www.sysfs.be/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:03:04AM +0200, Ghe Rivero wrote:
* Package name: libuser
Description : a user and group account administration library.
The libuser library implements a standardized interface for manipulating
and administering user and group accounts. The library
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: emifreq-applet
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Stephane Demurget [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://zzrough.free.fr/emifreq.php
* License : GPL
Description : CPU Frequency Scaling applet
EmiFreq applet is a
solutions,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely
Filip Van Raemdonck [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Removed because RFP is old? :o
No, because it is a dupe for #181506. While they had been merged, the
second did not provide any
auto-pgp is in contrib, because it requires pgp, which used to be in
non-free for woody and before.
In sarge and sid, there is not even a pgp package anymore. While auto-pgp
thus still qualifies to remain as it is (in contrib), it has an open ITO ||
RFA bug for over 5 years (#68134)
Apparently
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 03:20:34PM -0300, Luiz Carlos Querino Filho wrote:
* Package name: gtkscintilla
Description : GTK wrapper for the Scintilla source code editing widget
Why, if I may ask so? This is an obsolete library for an obsolete (GTK+
1.x) toolkit. There already is an
Hi,
Some time ago you submitted an ITP for FM.
Your last message on that bug page is well over a year old now. Do you still
plan to go on with it?
TBH, I think it would be more useful to spend effort on other packages if
you want to help Debian, or Free Software. FM appears to be dead upstream,
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:38:49AM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
* Package name: gfile
* URL : http://lab.erasme.org/gfile/index.html
Err... why
This software is solidly dead upstream, uses an obsolete toolkit (GTK+
1.x) and from looking at it's homepage does not offer any
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:17:04AM +0200, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: opengroupware.org
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 07:35:15AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
This applications mixes two incompatible (advertising requirement 4-clause
BSD GPL) licenses.
I have tried to contact upstream about license changes;
without response so far, as far as I can remember.
Which is mostly my
Hi,
Regarding you orphaning gmail: I've checked and it appears _really_ dead
upstream, even it's website is gone.
Considering that the main feature are probably vfolders, and other MUAs
have that too now; that you say yourself it doesn't even build anymore,
and the deadness of it, would you mind
I should point out that at least 3a of the licence as sent to this ITP, is
_NOT_ DFSG free.
This isn't a real issue as currently mahogany appears to be GPL
dual-licensed, but whoever packages this should make sure to record that
Debian can only (re)distribute it under the terms of the GPL because
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 06:52:28PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
fre, 04.07.2003 kl. 12.48 skrev Filip Van Raemdonck:
Regarding you orphaning gmail: I've checked and it appears _really_ dead
upstream, even it's website is gone.
Considering that the main feature are probably vfolders
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:44:53AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
The GNOME 2 port of gnome-network is still a work in progress, but the
following tools are available now.
snip
Did you actually get any of these to run? They just sat there, reacting at
nothing, at best, or crashed more often for me
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 08:29:02PM +0530, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
What prevents you from uploading to incoming?
Nothing. But it's stalled in NEW/.
Regards,
Filip
--
It's not usually cost effective time wise to go do it. But if something's
really pissing you off, you just go
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:37:21AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
Will you consider putting it on people.d.o while it hovers in NEW land?
Done, p.d.o/~mechanix/ (not aptable).
However, the .deb is for powerpc so unless you also use that arch you'll
have to rebuild the source package.
Regards,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name : gpdf
Version : 0.100
URL : http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gpdf/
License : GPLv2
Description: Portable Document Format (PDF) viewer
Gpdf is a graphical viewer for documents in the Portable Document Format.
(These are
Hi,
I'm investigating some groupware packages and I saw your ITP. How is it
going? Do you have anything preliminary? What's your progress?
Regards,
Filip
--
Welcome to CML2 Adventure, version 1.6.1.
You are in a maze of twisty little Linux kernel options menus, all different.
The main room.
Hi,
You indicated you wanted to package new-pinepgp. Is that still the case?
Otherwise, it should probably be retitled back to RFP.
(If I don't hear anything within a week or such, I'll retitle anyway)
Regards,
Filip
--
If you receive something that says Send this to everyone you know,
unmerge 138039
close 138039
thanks
There's no good in merged O: (or other) bugs on wnpp; it only clutters
the web page.
Regards,
Filip
--
I decry the current tendency to seek patents on algorithms. There are
better ways to earn a living than to prevent other people from making
use of one's
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:35:28PM +0100, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
Thanks for taking care of ubit on Debian :)
Actually, I'm not :-|
I've just cleaned up about two dozen merged wnpp bugs, I didn't cc: the
individual bug numbers because the list was so long.
I closed those which did not have
retitle 68134 ITO: auto-pgp - PGP tools for command-line and emacs use
thanks
The ITA apparently didn't get anywhere.
Regards,
Filip
--
Much blood has been spilled as a result of arguments about how many buttons
a mouse ought to have. Naive users prefer one (it is hard to push te wrong
retitle 68638 O: dot-forward -- .forward compatibility for qmail
retitle 68639 O: fastforward -- aliases-style mail forwarding for qmail
thanks
The ITA's from 77741 and 77742 appear to not have gone anywhere.
Regards,
Filip
--
The software required Win95 or better, so I installed Linux.
retitle 164408 ITA: gnome-apt
thanks
--
The Unixverse ends on Tue, 19 Jan 2038 03:14:07 +
pgpUAHqlhX60Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:53:06AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
In my respository you can find rox 1.3.4 packaged.
http://users.stone.pl/szczepan/apt/ ? That 403's on me.
Or is it somewhere else now (that's from google).
Regards,
Filip
--
Those who are willing to sacrifice
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 11:54:19AM +0200, Jan Wagemakers wrote:
Marcin Juszkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
Second thing is - what part of ROX-Filer functionality which I removed
in my package you want to have in it:
- starting dir/AppRun just by click on dir folder icon
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:50:29PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
And one more thing: Are you using ROX-Filer? And if yes - which
packages :))
Yes. And I'm obviously using my packages.
It's true, the ones in the repository are a bit out of date. I'm slowly
porting things over to the
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 10:19:26AM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
I'm interested in the pacwars2 packaging. I've been looking at the site
and it looks like they've gone for the full GPL license, so that
shouldn't be a problem.
That part isn't, but there are other problems. They use some
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: blackpenguin
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Holger Priebs
URL : http://www.priebs.de/blackpenguin.html
License : GPL
Description : Q*Bert like game
Black Penguin is a game which bears much similarity to
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 04:53:32PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I would like to ask you if you have had any success with the
rox* packages. If you want to I can take over this. I do not use the
application so if you are more experienced I'll happily let you do
that job. :)
Yes and no. See
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:50:34 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:29:22 +0100, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
This is the upstream (and source) package name, binary will most likely be
gtk-theme-crux.
why not gtk-engines-crux?
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:36:28PM +0100, Erich
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: eazel-engine
Version : 0.3
* URL : http://gtk.classic.themes.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Crux theme for GTK+
This is the upstream (and source) package name, binary
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-11-19
Severity: wishlist
Package name: rox
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Thomas Leonard tal197 on users.sourceforge.net
URL : http://rox.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL
Description : Risc Os on X -
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:24:21PM +0900, Masayuki Hatta wrote:
Description : Palatino-likes fonts for TeX
Like txfonts(already in sid), this package contains a bunch of afm, pfb, tfm,
and vf etc. to set up and use Adobe Palatino fonts (or its substitute) in your
TeX documents. With
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-08-24
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
There's been a lot of font talking for the last few days, one of them being
a lack of free truetype fonts.
The openoffice suite however is LGPLed (dual-licensed actually, but hey) and
it includes among others a nice set of
Hiya all,
I'm CC:ing this to James Moss and the fam en imon ITP bugs for completeness.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 11:53:12AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I just wanted to know the status of your fam-oss package. You might be
interested to know that Alex Larsson has created a patch that uses
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-07-23
Severity: wishlist
Description:
Innovation3D or shorthand I3D is a 3d modeling program. Among it's features
are basic polygonal modeling, support for NURBS curves and surfaces, and
animation.
Homepage: http://innovation3d.sourceforge.net/
License:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-07-13
Severity: wishlist
License is LGPL.
short description:
NURBS++ is a set of libraries written in C++ that provide manipulation
routines for NURBS curves and surfaces.
Regards,
Filip
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 01:29:45PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Filip Van Raemdonck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NURBS++ is a set of libraries written in C++ that provide manipulation
routines for NURBS curves and surfaces.
Are you by any chance packaging Mind's Eye
Regards,
Filip
--
/-- Filip Van Raemdonck --\
GPG key at public keyservers. Signed or encrypted mail preferred.
Linux, because I'd like to *get there* today!
\-- Debian/GNU Linux maintainer - http
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-04-28
Severity: wishlist
Home page: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/
License: GPL (for the daemon) and Lesser GPL (for the communication library)
Regards,
Filip
--
/-- Filip Van Raemdonck --\
GPG
43 matches
Mail list logo
