I should mention that ocrmypdf no longer has an immediate use for PyMuPDF -
I went the route of creating pikepdf, Python bindings for qpdf, and this is
library is now in Debian thanks to Sean's work on packaging it. I don't
think I would use PyMuPDF if it were available. pikepdf overlaps the core
o
g this.
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 at 17:05 Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 03:27:00AM +, James R Barlow wrote:
> > Thanks for your help. Output order is due to multiprocessing.
>
> No problem.
>
> > That nailed it. tesseract 3.04.01 change
pt: 1
Script confidence: 45.33
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 16:28 Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:45:51PM +, James R Barlow wrote:
> > In any case, could you try running this:
> > ocrmypdf --rotate-pages tests/resources/cardinal.pdf out.pdf
> >
&
6 at 12:04 Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 07:11:32AM +, James R Barlow wrote:
> > What version of leptonica is installed?
> > tesseract --version will report this.
>
> From within my Sid chroot:
>
> root@artemis:/build/ocrmypdf-4.0
I have seen a similar problem.
What version of leptonica is installed?
tesseract --version will report this.
Also what's the file name for liblept?
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 21:29 Sean Whitton wrote:
> Dear James,
>
> OCRmyPDF's test suite is currently failing under a freshly-installed
> Debian Si
Yes, I'll tag a release when it's ready to go.
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 at 17:26 Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 01:55:47PM +0000, James R Barlow wrote:
> > I updated my tree, eliminating one file whose status I couldn't
> determine,
> &g
I updated my tree, eliminating one file whose status I couldn't determine,
replacing another with an equivalent free file and documenting the rest.
The file has also been renamed to README so that Github shows it
automatically.
https://github.com/jbarlow83/OCRmyPDF/tree/develop/tests/resources
Ple
; Hello,
>
> Thank you for your e-mail.
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 01:35:10AM +, James R Barlow wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 at 17:05 Sean Whitton
> wrote:
> > I have a non-packaging question that I'd like to take this
> opportunity
> > to as
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 at 17:05 Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 03:23:39AM -0800, James R Barlow wrote:
> > Let me know if you'd like to see any changes to help with packaging.
>
> Thank you for your input, and for OCRmyPDF.
>
> I have a non-
Let me know if you'd like to see any changes to help with packaging.
If you are packaging around 3.1.1, versions older than 3.2.1 are
incompatible with the recently released img2pdf 0.2.0; they require 0.1.5,
and they do not enforce this dependency on their own. If you try to install
any of them n
10 matches
Mail list logo
