Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: postfix-mta-sts-resolver
Version : 0.2.4
* URL : https://github.com/Snawoot/postfix-mta-sts-resolver
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: python
Description : Daemon which provides TLS client policy for
Package: wnpp
I'm orphaning libtool.
It currently has 1 RC bug, and the last NMU at least seems to
cause a regression.
Kurt
t; "unversioned, incomplete, barely documented, and seems to be
> unmaintained" [3]. Kurt Roeckx proposed a patch to add a compatibility
> shim [4], and a number of other projects have done something similar,
> but the OpenSSH developers have explicitly said that they do not wan
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 01:33:09PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>
> Will check what could be causing this.
That has been fixed in an NMU, see #851803
Kurt
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 02:10:09PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2/19/17 07:01, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >>> I could really use some help with the ntp (network time protocol)
> >>> package. There have been various bugs filed, and I didn't have the
> >>>
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 08:56:40AM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:48:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> Hi Kurt,
>
> > I could really use some help with the ntp (network time protocol)
> > package. There have been various bugs filed, and I
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I could really use some help with the ntp (network time protocol)
package. There have been various bugs filed, and I didn't have the
time to properly look at them and deal with them.
It's currently team maintained, but I've been the only one doing
anything the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ntpsec
Version : 0.9.1
* URL : https://www.ntpsec.org
* License : NTP / BSD 3-Clause / BSD 4-Clause
Description : a secure, hardened, and improved ntp daemon
I don't actually have the time to work on this
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 04:19:27PM +0100, William Bonnet wrote:
> Hi Kurt
>
> I am really interested in helping on this package.
>
> Do you still need some help ? If yes please let me know. It is about
> one year without comments on this bug. Maybe you have found some
> people ? But it is still
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
The why package has been replaced by a why3 version upstream. You
can find it at http://why3.lri.fr
It would be nice that we'd also have why3.
Kurt
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 09:15:31PM +0200, Antti Järvinen wrote:
Hello,
Last comment is one month old, the previous ~3 years old. Is there
currently need for help here ; bugreport is still open? I'd be willing
to help in maintaining openssl or related packages
- but I'm very now to debian
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 02:09:55PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I plan to try and get them to use symbol versioning, at least on
those platforms that support it. This will probably be just like
Thank you.
the patch currently
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 08:36:30PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Mike Hommey:
Well, it kind of is. Because those versioned symbols in openssl come
from a debian patch, afaict. So while debian may be fine (as long as all
build-rdeps have been rebuilt since openssl got those versioned
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:06:27AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Toni Mueller t...@debian.org
* Package name: libressl
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : The OpenBSD project, the OpenSSL project et al.
* URL :
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:53:45PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi Kurt,
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:25:47PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
What are you doing with the binaries, include files, man pages,
...? Will they conflict with the ones from openssl?
my intention is to package
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:15:13PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:53:45PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
There are a number of reasons for that, but one has been that I was
unhappy about the perceived 'closedness' of the project
I was never very happy with it either
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:10:20PM +0100, Pierre Alexandre SCHEMBRI wrote:
Hi,
I would like to help maintaining this package.
I am new to the debian packaging but I have a good technical background.
Is the help still needed ?
Yes, more than ever, since I really lack the time to put much time
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:23:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
is there any status on the LanguageTool ITP? My last information
was that it was possible to build the dicts which are binary-only
in the tree but with much work.
I ask because LibreOffice includes LT per default[1]
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:28:16PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
Time has passed and parallel became a GNU project:
http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
I guess packaging it can be reconsidered?
Do you know about parallel in moreutils? Is there an advantage
over that one?
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 05:36:57PM +0100, Joost van Baal wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joost van Baal joostvb-debian-bugs-2010120...@mdcc.cx
* Package name: timbl
Version : 6.3.0
Upstream Author : ILK Research Group, Tilburg University, http://ilk.uvt.nl
*
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:54:02AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
retitle 568866 ITA: systemtap -- instrumentation system for Linux 2.6
owner !
thanks
Thanks to the Kernel Team the -dbg package are available now. So I am
adopting
it. I do have some interest in this package as my work
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:06:13PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 19 Apr 2010 02:03:21 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to add a note to this bug to say that I am still
interested in adopting systemtap, but am currently a bit short on free
time.
If someone else
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 03:46:42PM +0100, Ondrej Surý wrote:
I agree. But this is a good start. I will examine dnssec-conf package
more thoroughly this
week and probably make a preliminary packaging.
How is it going?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 09:33:15PM +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
Kurt Roeckx, 2009-02-05 20:13:06 +0100 :
Hi,
The bug log mentions that it was uploaded to NEW, but I don't see it
in queue anymore, so I wonder what happened with it?
Rejected because of file conflicts with other packages
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 08:42:27PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
Package: wnpp
Owner: Roland Mas lola...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: argyll
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : Graeme Gill gra...@argyllcms.com
* URL or Web page : http://www.argyllcms.com/
*
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 05:53:49PM +1100, Mark Purcell wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell m...@debian.org
* Package name: lensfun
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Andrew Zabolotny z...@homelink.ru
* URL : http://lensfun.berlios.de
*
Hi,
Did you notice that crafty was orphaned and so is looking for
a new maintainer now? You prepared a new version before so
I was wondering if you want to be maintainer?
I don't think that you're currently a maintainer of any package in
Debian so I'm willing to sponsor the package for you.
reopen 409604
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:15:09PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:18:14PM +0200, Peter Antoniac wrote:
- Missing and incorrect Conflicts: entries in the control file for Debian.
If you mean the Conflicts with 11 and 13, we don't want those two packages
to
Package: wnpp
I have no interest in maintaining this package anymore. If someone ones
to adopt it, please go ahead.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 04:45:57PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
retitle 403619 ITP: languagetool -- rule-based language checker
owner 403619 Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Hi,
Am Montag, 18. Dezember 2006 14:53 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
Package name: languagetool
Version: 0.8.6
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 02:10:37AM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
[Please add me to your CC list.]
I request an adopter for the kbd package.
Actually it was never my intention to maintain kbd, but its
maintainer was the group Console utilities maintainers
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:59:41AM +0100, Tim Retout wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Retout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: ircservices
Version : 5.1pre1
Upstream Author : Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:04:21PM +0100, Tim Retout wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:41 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Several, according to the table at:
http://www.ircservices.za.net/download/testing/docs/2.html#1
I've tested with ircd-hybrid, but it should also do ircd-ircu and
ircd-irc2
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:18:57PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
2007/5/7, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Mike Hommey:
Why not package this as libtool and upload to experimental ?
It would be impossible to build-depend on it. This may or may not be
a good thing.
I think the
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:01:32PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libtool-cvs
Version : 2.1a (2007-04-10)
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 11:06:44AM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
Version : 2.1a (2007-04-10)
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Shell
Description : Generic library
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:55:30AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 00:27, Anibal Avelar wrote:
Hi. I see you have in queue NEW three packages: beryl-plugins,
beryl-settings and emerald [1] and not ready (yet) beryl.
Firstly, the beryl packages were REJECTED because
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: mlatin
Version: 0.34
Upstream Author: Jean-Pierre Sutto jpsspam(at)free.fr
URL: http://jpsn.free.fr/mlatin/
License: GPL
Description: Latin dictionary
Latin dictionary for ispell and myspell/hunspell.
There also seems to be an other Latin dictionary
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: languagetool
Version: 0.8.6
Upstream Author: Daniel Naber (naber at danielnaber de)
URL: http://www.danielnaber.de/languagetool
License: Mostly LGPL, also some BSD, Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0
Description: A rule-based language
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 03:42:20PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, 18. Dezember 2006 14:53 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
Package name: languagetool
Version: 0.8.6
Upstream Author: Daniel Naber (naber at danielnaber de)
URL: http://www.danielnaber.de/languagetool
License: Mostly
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 03:05:53AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
IMHO the package is in good shape now, lintian and linda only report
missing manpages and piuparts doesn't find any problems.
Do you have any objections to uploading the package (patches
attached)?
I would like to see some
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 03:05:53AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 12:18:37PM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
However I've now tried to build the resulting tree on mipsel and
sparc, but the testsuite fails on both (failed: sparc: 3/23, mipsel: 5/23).
I'll look
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 01:49:23AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
Weehee, I've done it :)
I've attached the quilt patchset, it applies on top of
elfutils-0.122.tar.gz as extracted from that rpm:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 03:09:05AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 02:29:00AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I currently have 1 problem, and that is with the ebl library.
It's only available as a static library, but it can dlopen()
several shared objects, depending
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 11:02:59AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
Is the work you've done available online somewhere, so I could take
a look?
I currently do have enough time, and somehow I also happen to like
this lowlevel ELF stuff for some strange reason..
I've put what I currently
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:55:12AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
Hi,
what's the status of this? It would be nice to have elfutils back.
Anything I can do to help?
Buy me some more time? :) I'm currently working on other Debian
things which I find more important. Anyway, if you want to
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:38:41PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
We could use a few more people to help with the ntp package. We have a
new mailing list and a subversion repository hosted under the pkg-ntp
project on alioth. There is a boatload of bugs to
Package: wnpp
Hi,
In http://bugs.debian.org/304890, Ben Collins said:
Feel free, to take over the package. I was only doing it temporarily since
no one else was at the time.
So I believe this package is now up for adoption.
Ben, I hope this is OK with you? Maybe you want to change it to
a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : elfutils
* Version : 0.120
* Upstream Author : redhat (Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL :ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/systemtap/elfutils/
* License : GPL
Description : A collection of utilities and DSOs to handle compiled
objects.
Elfutils
Hi,
I'm now co-maintaining it, but Martin seems to be rather busy, so
I'm doing most of the work.
I wouldn't mind someone else helping out. There have been a few
people that said they wanted to help, but I haven't seen them
doing anything useful so far.
So, I think this RFH should still
Hi,
What is the status of this RFH?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
This RFH seems to be open for quiet a while without any action.
Several people seem to have offered being co-maintainer. Can
someone please shed some light on what's going on with it?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
What is the status of this RFH?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 266387 RM: libtool1.4 -- RoQA; obsolete version
reassign 266387 ftp.debian.org
thanks
The last package build depending on it (freeradius) recently
removed the build dependency on libtool1.4, and has reached
testing now. There is no reason to still keep libtool1.4 around
anymore.
Kurt
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:07:01PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the openssl package.
I am currently the only maintainer, but this package really needs a
team to work on it. Too many packages depend on the library
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 03:05:08PM +0200, Riccardo Setti wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Riccardo Setti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cinelerra-cvs
Version : 2.0-cvs
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License :
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:20:05PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 09:42:52PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I'm also interested in adopting this package.
Is this still the case?
Yes, and now I'm DD and don't need a sponsor I'll probably upload
this soon.
Is there a reason
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:23:02AM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
Hello.
I would like to ask if anybody is working on the libtool package.
The current libtool package is in horrible state. The upstream source is
actively maintained, the Debian package is different in very misterious ways.
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 01:38:22AM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: x3270
Version : 3.3.4
Upstream Author : Paul Mattes
* URL : http://x3270.bgp.nu
* License : other
Hi Guillem,
Are you interested in taking over posixtestsuite? If you're not,
I might take it.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 11:08:28PM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
Hi,
I'm orphaning these packages:
dutch (bug #314839)
dutch should probably be adopted by someone who speaks Dutch.
I'm willing to adopt this package is nobody else wants it.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 08:29:40PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
I'm interested in taking this package over.
I'm currently not a DD, still in NM, so I will atleast need a sponsor.
I'm happy to sponsor this package.
I've been waiting for sarge to release before doing anything
about this, so I
owner 302484 !
retitle 302484 ITA: libtool -- Generic library support script
thanks
I'm interested in taking this package over.
I'm currently not a DD, still in NM, so I will atleast need a sponsor.
I'm also open for other people who wish to co-maintain this.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
owner 300095 !
retitle 300095 ITA: madplay -- MPEG audio player in fixed point
thanks
Hi,
I wish to adopt this package.
I'm currently not a DD so I'll need a sponsor.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:16:10PM +0100, Gabor Burjan wrote:
Hi Kurt,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 03:54:49AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
It's stuck in new for a few weeks now.
Do you know why it is stuck there?
Because the ftp-master are busy with other things. They didn't
process much
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:47:04AM +, Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
I'm happy to sponsor an initial upload for you, and look over your
package.
I'll prepare a package this evening and will let you know when
I'm done with it.
Kurt
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 11:40:51AM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
qprof
An easy-to-install and use flat profiler which supports
multi-threaded applications and shared libraries. This tool
works on many Linux platforms and can be installed by ordinary
users. See the qprof
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:58:33PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
* Package name: openntpd
Upstream Author : Henning Brauer and Alexander Guy
* URL : http://www.openntpd.org/
* License : BSD
Description : OpenBSD NTP deamon
OpenNTPD is a FREE implementation
I'm also interested in adopting this package.
I'm currently not a Debian Developer but I'm going thru NM.
Kurt
70 matches
Mail list logo
