Bug#515793: ITP: CGIT -- C-code Web Front-end to GIT

2012-07-30 Thread Marc Singer
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Marc, Marc Singer wrote: On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: Did you mean this to be a private reply? Not really. Ok, cc-ing the bug. [...] The policy of the git

Bug#515793: ITP: CGIT -- C-code Web Front-end to GIT

2012-07-30 Thread Marc Singer
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Marc, Marc Singer wrote: Do you need my help? Yes, because I do not use cgit. We would need an active user to make sure it keeps working and to evaluate requests that come in through the BTS. In other words

Bug#515793: Get cgit included with statically linked libgit.a?

2010-03-15 Thread Marc Singer
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Paul Menzel pm.deb...@googlemail.comwrote: Am Sonntag, den 07.03.2010, 15:51 -0800 schrieb Marc Singer: On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Paul Menzel pm.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 09:40 -0800 schrieb Marc Singer: The upstream

Bug#515793: Get cgit included with statically linked libgit.a?

2010-03-07 Thread Marc Singer
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Paul Menzel pm.deb...@googlemail.comwrote: Dear Marc, Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 09:40 -0800 schrieb Marc Singer: The upstream build of cgit requires a download of git to build libgit which this package links statically. Thus, this package practically

Bug#515793: ITP: CGIT -- C-code Web Front-end to GIT

2009-02-17 Thread Marc Singer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist The upstream build of cgit requires a download of git to build libgit which this package links statically. Thus, this package practically depends on a change to git-core. http://hjemli.net/git/cgit/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#192730: ITP: annoyance-filter

2003-05-09 Thread Marc Singer
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:55:48PM +0200, Thomas Scheffczyk wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Hello, I intend to create a package for 'annoyance-filter'. It's always nice to have options. Is there something compelling about using annoyance-filter over bogofilter?