On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:51:29 +0200
Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your ITP is going on for several years, and the last note from you is
> dated Tue, 25 May 2004 00:24:16 +0200. So I have two questions:
> a) Is it possible for your "leo" to call its binary something
> different, maybe
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:08:51 +0200
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some remarks, not that I'm not a Debian Developer (yet), but before
> leo can be included in Debian, these issues need to be resolved anyway
Thanks for your reply, its helps a lot.
I repackaged leo, I hope it s
On Mon, 24 May 2004 14:20:19 +0200
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't get automatically an answer to a ITP. You'll need to go look
> for a sponsor pro-actively, for example by mailing to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] See
> http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
On Mon, 24 May 2004 11:33:11 +0200
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Xavier, what is the status of packaging leo?
I have never got any answer to my ITP (I am not a Debian developer, so
I needed someone to review my package and sponsor it), I just gave up.
If someone is willing t
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: leo
Version : 3.10
Upstream Author : Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://personalpages.tds.net/~edream/front.html
* License : Python licence
Description
5 matches
Mail list logo