Bug#173879: Binary/Package name "leo" (ITPs)

2005-08-09 Thread Xavier Antoviaque
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:51:29 +0200 Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your ITP is going on for several years, and the last note from you is > dated Tue, 25 May 2004 00:24:16 +0200. So I have two questions: > a) Is it possible for your "leo" to call its binary something > different, maybe

Bug#173879: RFS: leo -- a literate editor with outlines for X-Window

2004-05-24 Thread Xavier Antoviaque
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:08:51 +0200 Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some remarks, not that I'm not a Debian Developer (yet), but before > leo can be included in Debian, these issues need to be resolved anyway Thanks for your reply, its helps a lot. I repackaged leo, I hope it s

Bug#173879: Leo

2004-05-24 Thread Xavier Antoviaque
On Mon, 24 May 2004 14:20:19 +0200 Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You don't get automatically an answer to a ITP. You'll need to go look > for a sponsor pro-actively, for example by mailing to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] See > http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html

Bug#173879: Leo

2004-05-24 Thread Xavier Antoviaque
On Mon, 24 May 2004 11:33:11 +0200 Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Xavier, what is the status of packaging leo? I have never got any answer to my ITP (I am not a Debian developer, so I needed someone to review my package and sponsor it), I just gave up. If someone is willing t

Bug#173879: ITP: leo -- a literate editor with outlines for X-Window

2002-12-21 Thread Xavier Antoviaque
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-21 Severity: wishlist * Package name: leo Version : 3.10 Upstream Author : Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://personalpages.tds.net/~edream/front.html * License : Python licence Description