> "Stephan" == Stephan Verbücheln writes:
Stephan> As far as I understand it, the main point of BabaSSL is to
Stephan> add support for Chinese developed ciphers and algorithms.
It looked like there were two main points.
The first was in fact these ciphers.
I don't think that's a good
On Jun 30, Stephan Verbücheln wrote:
> As far as I understand it, the main point of BabaSSL is to add support
> for Chinese developed ciphers and algorithms.
Is supporting Chinese cryptography standards a goal for Debian?
If it is then they should be available to all packages, but if it is not
t
As far as I understand it, the main point of BabaSSL is to add support
for Chinese developed ciphers and algorithms.
Long time ago in my student years, I was working with a German fork of
OpenSSL. The point was to add German elliptic curves (BSI and Deutsche
Telekom). They were eventually merged i
On Jun 22, Lance Lin wrote:
> Yes, from my understanding it is a "drop in" replacement for OpenSSL. One of
> my packages (Workflow) uses it but can also use OpenSSL.
>
> I think this package will be beneficial to the Workflow users and downstream
> OS's.
Can you explain exactly what benefits
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 01:43:25PM +, Lance Lin wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Thank you for your input and guidance. I've only been in Debian for a year so
>
> I still have many things to learn. I assumed there would be issues with
> library
> name conflicts and wanted to get the group's opi
Hi,
On 22-06-2022 20:04, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Or if the goal is rather to experiment and expose BabaSSL to the many archs
we have in Debian, then keep it in unstable only by filing a bug to block
it from testing.
Or better: experimental, to avoid packages starting to (build-)depend on it.
Am Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 02:28:36PM + schrieb Lance Lin:
> Hello Marco,
>
> > What is the plan? Are there any current or new packages which will
> > depend on it?
>
> Yes, from my understanding it is a "drop in" replacement for OpenSSL. One of
> my packages (Workflow) uses it but can also use
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 02:21:43PM +, Lance Lin wrote:
> > AFAIK this library is forked from OpenSSL with some extensive
> > modifications to support new crypto technologies, do you think we need
> > to involve the Security Team to review whether this package can be
> > supported during the nex
On Jun 17, Lance Lin wrote:
> - BabaSSL is a modern cryptographic and secure protocol library
> developed by the amazing people in Alibaba Digital Economy.
What is the plan? Are there any current or new packages which will
depend on it?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 12:43 AM Lance Lin wrote:
>
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Lance Lin
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, lqi...@protonmail.com
>
> * Package name: libBabaSSL
> Version : 8.3.1
> Upstream Author : Copyright (c) 2020-2022 Alibab
10 matches
Mail list logo