Incus 0.4 has been uploaded to NEW.
Mathias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
At the end of the weekend, I think packaging for Incus is at the
point that we're ready for an upload to NEW once golang-github-
canonical-lxd-dev clears.
I have applied a patch to disable the loki logging integration for
the time being and return an error if someone tries to configure it.
Mathias Gibbens writes:
> Late last night I successfully built Incus as a Debian package for
> the first time! ️
>
> There are two blockers before we can perform the initial upload to
> NEW:
>
> 1 -- Remaining build deps:
>
> * We're still waiting on
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 12:52 PM Mathias Gibbens wrote:
>
> Late last night I successfully built Incus as a Debian package for
> the first time! ️
Nice!
> There are two blockers before we can perform the initial upload to
> NEW:
>
> 1 -- Remaining build deps:
>
> * We're still waiting
Late last night I successfully built Incus as a Debian package for
the first time! ️
There are two blockers before we can perform the initial upload to
NEW:
1 -- Remaining build deps:
* We're still waiting on bin:golang-github-canonical-lxd-dev to
make it through NEW.
*
Yeah, it's my current plan to keep providing image server access to Debian
users until the trixie release or until Incus makes it to
bookworm-backports whichever happens first.
We don't really want to block access to users who don't have a good way out.
So while the published plan is fast paced
Free Ekanayaka writes:
> Raphael Hertzog writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2023, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2023-12-25 at 12:52 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>> > I would really like to see incus in unstable/testing and even in
>>> > bookworm-backports at some point.
>>>
>>>
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2023, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
>> On Mon, 2023-12-25 at 12:52 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> > I would really like to see incus in unstable/testing and even in
>> > bookworm-backports at some point.
>>
>> Given the large number of
Hello,
On Tue, 26 Dec 2023, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-12-25 at 12:52 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I would really like to see incus in unstable/testing and even in
> > bookworm-backports at some point.
>
> Given the large number of new/updated dependencies for Incus, it
> would
On Mon, 2023-12-25 at 12:52 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I would really like to see incus in unstable/testing and even in
> bookworm-backports at some point.
Given the large number of new/updated dependencies for Incus, it
would be a lot of work to properly prepare a release for bookworm-
Hello Raphael,
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2023, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>> raft 0.17.7-1 is now in unstable, and I've uploaded cowsql 1.15.3-1,
>> which is waiting in the NEW queue.
>
> This one is available in unstable now. I would really like to see incus
> in
Hello,
On Sat, 21 Oct 2023, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> raft 0.17.7-1 is now in unstable, and I've uploaded cowsql 1.15.3-1,
> which is waiting in the NEW queue.
This one is available in unstable now. I would really like to see incus
in unstable/testing and even in bookworm-backports at some point.
Hi guys,
raft 0.17.7-1 is now in unstable, and I've uploaded cowsql 1.15.3-1,
which is waiting in the NEW queue.
Free
Mathias Gibbens writes:
> On Sun, 2023-10-08 at 12:19 +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>> It seems that v6 of golang-github-checkpoint-restore-go-criu is in
>> experimental:
>>
>> https://packages.debian.org/experimental/golang-github-checkpoint-restore-go-criu-dev
>>
>> Not sure if there are
On Sun, 2023-10-08 at 12:19 +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> It seems that v6 of golang-github-checkpoint-restore-go-criu is in
> experimental:
>
> https://packages.debian.org/experimental/golang-github-checkpoint-restore-go-criu-dev
>
> Not sure if there are blockers for it to move to unstable
Mathias Gibbens writes:
> Control: reassign -1 wnpp
> Control: retitle -1 ITP: Incus -- Powerful system container and virtual
> machine manager
> Control: severity -1 wishlist
> Control: block -1 by 1052536 1001989
>
> I'm converting this bug to an ITP, as there's clearly sufficient
>
bug #1042989 to the same values
previously set
> retitle -1 ITP: Incus -- Powerful system container and virtual machine manager
Bug #1042989 [wnpp] Consider switching packaging to Incus
Changed Bug title to 'ITP: Incus -- Powerful system container and virtual
machine manager' from 'Consider swi
17 matches
Mail list logo