Bug#1051983: RFS: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2023-10-18 Thread Tom Parkin
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 02:21:48 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 09:27:38PM +0100, Tom Parkin wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 01:38:58 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > > I've uploaded your package to NEW. However, please look at my commits. > > > > Thank you very much :-) >

Bug#1051983: RFS: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2023-10-17 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 09:27:38PM +0100, Tom Parkin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 01:38:58 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > I've uploaded your package to NEW. However, please look at my commits. > > Thank you very much :-) > > I've just had a look at your changes on the debian/0.1.6-1 tag. Th

Bug#1051983: RFS: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2023-10-17 Thread Tom Parkin
Hi Nilesh, On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 01:38:58 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > I've uploaded your package to NEW. However, please look at my commits. Thank you very much :-) I've just had a look at your changes on the debian/0.1.6-1 tag. Thank you for catching the copyright for l2tp.h! Should I mer

Bug#1051983: RFS: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2023-10-17 Thread Nilesh Patra
I've uploaded your package to NEW. However, please look at my commits. I also have a quick question -- is the interface of the library somehow architecture dependent? if so the "M-A: foreign" field should be dropped. Thanks for your contribution! Best, Nilesh signature.asc Description: PGP sig

Bug#1051983: RFS: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2023-10-17 Thread Tom Parkin
Hi pkg-go, I am seeking a sponsor for the package golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp[1], which contains tools that are used by default by the NetworkManager-l2tp[2] plugin. Currently nm-l2tp users have to build/install the go-l2tp programs themselves if they wish to make use of them. The package has