Quoting Andrej Shadura (2024-10-04 10:47:19)
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024, at 23:31, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I realize that I am a bad fit for teamwork here, and step back from
> > this collaboration.
>
> Is this because of synapse?
No. Related, but more the other way around: Main reason my work on
Hi,
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024, at 23:31, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I realize that I am a bad fit for teamwork here, and step back from
> this collaboration.
Is this because of synapse?
> For the record, I have a strong interest in this package being well
> maintained in Debian, so if at some point it m
Quoting Andrej Shadura (2023-11-16 18:19:47)
> Hello,
>
> On 16/11/2023 18:14, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Upstream project consist of multiple crates released in sync - which is
> > a pattern that is only inefficiently handled by the Rust team (by
> > needlessly packaging each individual crate as
Hi Alex,
> I'm not sure that is really our policy? We package multiple binaries
> for packages that have them.
>From the "Packaging binaries" section in debcargo-conf's `rust_hacks.md`:
> If a package ships a binary but you only want to use it as library add this
> stanza in debcargo.toml:
>
>
Le 22/09/2024 à 09:16, Alexander Kjäll a écrit :
Hi
I'm not sure that is really our policy? We package multiple binaries
for packages that have them.
There is also a lot of crates on crates.io that have binaries that
isn't really intended/ready for inclusion in a major linux
distribution, and
Hi
I'm not sure that is really our policy? We package multiple binaries
for packages that have them.
There is also a lot of crates on crates.io that have binaries that
isn't really intended/ready for inclusion in a major linux
distribution, and more written as a demo of what the library can do,
t
Quoting noisyc...@tutanota.com (2024-09-21 23:06:42)
> > If you never offered to maintain resvg then how did this conversation
> > emerge? Did I try to bend your words, when all you initially said was
> > "whoops" and informing me that it was a bleep on the radar soon gone?
> > If that's the case t
> If you never offered to maintain resvg then how did this conversation
> emerge? Did I try to bend your words, when all you initially said was
> "whoops" and informing me that it was a bleep on the radar soon gone?
> If that's the case then I apologize for the confusion I have caused:
> Please sim
Quoting noisyc...@tutanota.com (2024-09-21 21:59:50)
> Jonas, you must have missed one piece of my first email, which I report below:
>
> > Jonas, I apologize for the duplicated work. Since you've been working on
> > this
> > for a long time I am more than willing to step down from {u,re}svg once
Jonas, you must have missed one piece of my first email, which I report below:
> Jonas, I apologize for the duplicated work. Since you've been working on this
> for a long time I am more than willing to step down from {u,re}svg once the
> sources are rejected. I am no user of resvg and I am not in
Quoting noisyc...@tutanota.com (2024-09-21 20:36:55)
> > Introduction of a binary package in another source package is not a reason
> > for rejection, as I understand it: That sounds like the only way to, well,
> > doing
> > exactly that: Move a binary package to being maintained in another source
> Introduction of a binary package in another source package is not a reason
> for rejection, as I understand it: That sounds like the only way to, well,
> doing
> exactly that: Move a binary package to being maintained in another source
> package.
Sure, but I would expect at least removal of the
Hi NoisyCoil (and Andrej),
> Right now src:rust-usvg and src:rust-resvg are in NEW and will
> probably be rejected since they build librust-{u,re}svg-dev, which
> albeit having been removed from testing are still in unstable.
Introduction of a binary package in another source package is not a
rea
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #1056068
X-Debbugs-Cc: noisyc...@tutanota.com, eam...@yaerobi.com,
debian-r...@lists.debian.org, n...@debian.org
For the record, `cargo debstatus` now lists both usvg and resvg as being in
NEW, but were it not for NEW they would be listed as absent. In fact, readin
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #1056068
X-Debbugs-Cc: noisyc...@tutanota.com, eam...@yaerobi.com,
debian-r...@lists.debian.org, n...@debian.org
Hi all,
While working on ITP #948483 I repackaged usvg and resvg v0.42 as dependencies
of broot, without knowing they were already being built by src:r
On 18/07/2024 04:47, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-07-17 16:49:12)
>> Quoting Blair Noctis (2024-07-16 23:14:59)
>>> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:00:57 +0100 "Andrej Shadura"
>>> wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, at 21:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Just a not
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2024-07-17 16:49:12)
> Quoting Blair Noctis (2024-07-16 23:14:59)
> > On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:00:57 +0100 "Andrej Shadura"
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, at 21:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > > Just a notice that I am still working on this. If y
Quoting Blair Noctis (2024-07-16 23:14:59)
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:00:57 +0100 "Andrej Shadura"
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, at 21:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Just a notice that I am still working on this. If you want to follow my
> > > work more closely, then I can put
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:00:57 +0100 "Andrej Shadura" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, at 21:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Just a notice that I am still working on this. If you want to follow my
> > work more closely, then I can put up my fork of the git repo somewhere,
> > but if you won't
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, at 21:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Just a notice that I am still working on this. If you want to follow my
> work more closely, then I can put up my fork of the git repo somewhere,
> but if you won't be looking closely anyway, then I will not bother
> setting that up, an
Quoting Andrej Shadura (2023-11-16 18:19:47)
> On 16/11/2023 18:14, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Upstream project consist of multiple crates released in sync -
> > which is a pattern that is only inefficiently handled by the Rust
> > team (by needlessly packaging each individual crate as a separate
Hello,
On 16/11/2023 18:14, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Upstream project consist of multiple crates released in sync - which is
a pattern that is only inefficiently handled by the Rust team (by
needlessly packaging each individual crate as a separate Debian source
package).
Unless you particularly
Quoting Andrej Shadura (2023-11-16 18:02:10)
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: re...@packages.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Rust
> Maintainers
> Control: affects -1 + src:resvg
>
> Hi all,
>
> resvg is a command-line SVG renderer which I introduced to Debian back
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: re...@packages.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Rust
Maintainers
Control: affects -1 + src:resvg
Hi all,
resvg is a command-line SVG renderer which I introduced to Debian back
in 2019. Unfortunately, very soon after the initial upload the u
24 matches
Mail list logo
