retitle 154281 RFP: libdvdcss -- Library to read scrambled DVDs
noowner 154281
tag 154281 - pending
thanks
Hi,
This is an automatic email to change the status of libdvdcss back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 12
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003, Robert Millan wrote:
> Ok. What are the necessary steps to request that we hire a lawyer to
> resolve this? Can I do it on my own or is SPI the entity who should take
> action here?
I don't know about those steps, but I have some additional information
about libdvdcss. As
[ this thread comes from libdvdcss ITP #154281 ]
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:21:53PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 02:01:46PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:31:08AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 02:01:46PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:31:08AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > As for the legal advice, what do you mean? Do you suggest that we
> > > hire a lawyer to advocate in favour of libdvdcss
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:31:08AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > As for the legal advice, what do you mean? Do you suggest that we hire a
> > lawyer to advocate in favour of libdvdcss?
>
>I suggest we hire a lawyer to tell us whether we may inclu
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003, Robert Millan wrote:
> As for the legal advice, what do you mean? Do you suggest that we hire a
> lawyer to advocate in favour of libdvdcss?
I suggest we hire a lawyer to tell us whether we may include libdvdcss
in Debian _or not_. This is roughly what we did for the cryp
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:26:47AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>
>The conclusion was from a single individual. I fully agree with Brian's
> analysis, but I am not a legal professional, and I do not live in the
> United States. I will not upload a libdvdcss package until we have a
> consensus and
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003, Robert Millan wrote:
> I see that you're the current maintainer of the debian package in upstream,
> and you're also a Debian member. The conclussion in debian-legal [1] was very
> clear, so why haven't you uploaded libdvdcss to the archive?
The conclusion was from a sing
Hi Sam,
Mikael Hedin hasn't responded to my queries on libdvdcss's ITP (#154281)
for a long time now, and I have taken it.
I see that you're the current maintainer of the debian package in upstream,
and you're also a Debian member. The conclussion in debian-legal [1] was very
clear, so why haven
9 matches
Mail list logo
