Bug#160444: Packages avaible

2004-04-13 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-13 20:12]: > I agree, we don't »need« it. I would say, it is a nice to have, which > doesn't hurt. Well, it does hurt. It means Debian needs more CDs, the Packages file gets bigger, etc. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#160444: Packages avaible

2004-04-13 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Good evening, * Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040413 19:20]: > > > sorry for the long delay, but I finaly made some packages avaible at: > > > http://www.schmehl.info/linux/debian/packages/opencola-softdrinkformula/ > > Do we really need this as a package in the archive? > IMHO not. I agre

Bug#160444: Packages avaible

2004-04-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-13 04:19]: > > sorry for the long delay, but I finaly made some packages avaible at: > > http://www.schmehl.info/linux/debian/packages/opencola-softdrinkformula/ > > Do we

Bug#160444: Packages avaible

2004-04-13 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-13 04:19]: > sorry for the long delay, but I finaly made some packages avaible at: > http://www.schmehl.info/linux/debian/packages/opencola-softdrinkformula/ Do we really need this as a package in the archive? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#160444: Packages avaible

2004-04-12 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi folks, sorry for the long delay, but I finaly made some packages avaible at: http://www.schmehl.info/linux/debian/packages/opencola-softdrinkformula/ I'll ask my old sponsor, if everything is okay. Yours sincerely, Alexander