On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 12:10:32AM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
If you don't, I'll take it; I've been carrying both updated arch and
arx packages on people.debian.org for some time now.
Since you already have more intimate knowledge of arch internals and
packaging (I hope ;), I guess you
If you don't, I'll take it; I've been carrying both updated arch and
arx packages on people.debian.org for some time now.
Since you already have more intimate knowledge of arch internals and
packaging (I hope ;), I guess you should take arch.
[I don't intend to upload arx to the archive
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:30:48PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
original upstream is gone and atm i don't have the time to bring
the package back into shape.
please have a look at http://arch.fifthvision.net/ for new upstream.
Last time I looked, Tom Lord released 1.0pre17, but that tells
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-05
Severity: normal
hi :)
original upstream is gone and atm i don't have the time to bring
the package back into shape.
please have a look at http://arch.fifthvision.net/ for new upstream.
I request an adopter for the arch package.
The
original upstream is gone and atm i don't have the time to bring
the package back into shape.
please have a look at http://arch.fifthvision.net/ for new upstream.
Last time I looked, Tom Lord released 1.0pre17, but that tells
nothing :)
As someone relying heavily on arch, and using it on a
5 matches
Mail list logo
