Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: debootstrap-buildd
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL or Web page :
* License : GPL
Description : Scripts to create chroots for building packages
This package contains custom
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:41:03PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
* Package name: debootstrap-buildd
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL or Web page :
* License : GPL
Description : Scripts to create chroots for building
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:41:03PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: debootstrap-buildd
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL or Web page :
* License : GPL
Description : Scripts
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 11:41:46PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Why can't this be integrated into debootstrap proper?
It would also be nice to add a --buildd option to debootstrap to
switch to using the buildd-* scripts by default.
Hrm, I'd be more inclined towards a --variant buildd
Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
pbuilder and sbuild (even if its build.chroot is currently broken on sid)
already do that standalone AFAIK. Is this a proposal for a common
package for both?
No, my motivation for this package is that pbuilder simply uses
debootstrap to
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 11:41:46PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Why can't this be integrated into debootstrap proper?
It would also be nice to add a --buildd option to debootstrap to
switch to using the buildd-* scripts by default.
Hrm, I'd be
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
I was thinking sid.buildd -- isn't that what they already are? Neither
bothers me.
Actually, I was thinking buildd-sid, but sid.buildd is fine too.
Here's my patch to add --variant=X and the buildd variant.
--
Daniel Schepler Please
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 03:52:35AM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
+if [ $VARIANT = .base ]; then
+ VARIANT=
+fi
Err, eww. I really dislike that.
Rest seems fine at first glance. Please talk to Ryan about it, test it a
bit, and then it should be time to do an NMU. You might like to
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:41:03PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: debootstrap-buildd
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL or Web page :
* License : GPL
Description : Scripts
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why is this called debootstrap-buildd? Does it have support for the
actual chroot requirements of the buildd system (i.e., the /build
directory, the lockfiles and -directories sbuild requires, and so on)?
Your description seems to suggest that isn't
10 matches
Mail list logo
