On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 06:30:34PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
> My interest in netkit-ftp and netkit-telnet was, of course, an attempt
> to get dibs on a standard priority package that I actually have some
> likelihood of using myself.
>
> The offer to throw work at the packages still stands
Scripsit Robert Millan
> On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:28:32AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Note also that Henning Makholm showed interest in some of these
> > netkit packages, so it'd be polite to inform him too. Note that he has a
> > valid point that standard packages should be co-maint
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:37:49PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:13:04PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > Well, I had a look at the BTS and netkit-ntalk has a 0-bug count. It's not
> > much work to maintain this package, but if you have some ideas or whatever
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:13:04PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:09:21AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > In principle yes -- though the packages is quite simple (so it might be
> > a bit overkill). I'll get back to you when I have comething concrete I
> > think --
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:09:21AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, not my fault. I did check but at that time your mail wasn't archived
> > yet and couldn't see it.
>
> Of course, stupid of me... I shouldn't have mailed while tired :).
> Sorry.
No problem.
> In principle yes
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:51:20AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:28:32AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> >
> > Eh? Did you check whether something happened to that bug first? I
> > guessed you didn't / missed it, since you didn't mail me.
>
> Sorry, not my fault.
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:28:32AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> Eh? Did you check whether something happened to that bug first? I
> guessed you didn't / missed it, since you didn't mail me.
Sorry, not my fault. I did check but at that time your mail wasn't archived
yet and couldn't see
noowner 249707
thanks
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:18:10PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > owner 249707 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bug#249707: ITA: netkit-ntalk -- Remote user communication server.
> Owner changed from Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMA
8 matches
Mail list logo
