* tbm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-15 17:59]:
* Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-03 06:20]:
Alex: Retitle #206119 to give it the same title as this bug, and merge
them. The same applies to #183358 (the original RFP for gtk2edit) and
#252385 (your newly opened, and therefore
* Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-03 06:20]:
Alex: Retitle #206119 to give it the same title as this bug, and merge
them. The same applies to #183358 (the original RFP for gtk2edit) and
#252385 (your newly opened, and therefore duplicate, ITP). See
Alex de Oliveira Silva wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I have intention of mantainer this package.
* Package name: pftp
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.pftp.de/
* License : GPL
Description : Fast file
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 04:53, Erik Steffl wrote:
Alex de Oliveira Silva wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I have intention of mantainer this package.
[...]
Wait! it already is packaged:
jojda:~ apt-cache show pftp
Package: pftp
It's currently orphaned. However, instead of
Il gio, 2004-06-03 alle 02:04, Alex de Oliveira Silva ha scritto:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I have intention of mantainer this package.
* Package name: pftp
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ehm... :)
bye
Christian
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 21:04:31 -0300
Alex de Oliveira Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I have intention of mantainer this package.
* Package name: pftp
Version : x.y.z
It would be quite interesting to mention which version of the program
you
Gosh, I hadn't noticed it.
You shouldn't file an ITP for a package that is already in the archive.
Also, the maintainer of the package has orphaned it (see bug #206119).
The right way (TM) would have been to retitle that bug as an ITA
(Intent to Adopt) and set its ownership to you.
So please, do
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 09:04:31PM -0300, Alex de Oliveira Silva wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I have intention of mantainer this package.
* Package name: pftp
Version : x.y.z
You're missing a version number.
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 09:04:31PM -0300, Alex de Oliveira Silva wrote:
* Package name: pftp
Err, I have the suspect what follows is wrong...
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I have intention of mantainer this package.
* Package name: pftp
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.pftp.de/
* License : GPL
Description : Fast file transfer program
This program
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 21:04, Alex de Oliveira Silva wrote:
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you sure about this information?
--
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.damog.net/
PGP 356E16CD - 84F0 E180 8AF6 E8D0 842F B520 63F3 08DB 356E
11 matches
Mail list logo