Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: pylucene-dev Digest, Vol 4, Issue 2

2004-09-25 Thread Andi Vajda
The value of a naked gcj-compiled lucene package is limited [...] because of the GC issues Are you sure? Do you think a naked gcj-compiled lucene package would be valuable for people creating swig bindings for languages such as OCaml, Perl, PHP[1], etc.? Do you think C application programmers

Bug#256283: [pylucene-dev] Re: pylucene-dev Digest, Vol 4, Issue 2

2004-09-19 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Who/What is Upsteam ? Doug Cutting ? Yes, Doug Cutting and other Java Lucene developers. I meant to say upstream instead of upsteam. Which version of Lucene, which version of gcj did you use [for the lucene demo programs]? I didn't see any segfaults or compilation warnings. Lucene is version