Bug#261257: ITP: folding -- Folding@home Client (install

2004-07-27 Thread Nick Lewycky
sean finney wrote: > > hi nick, > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:38:21PM -0400, Nick Lewycky wrote: > > >i believe he means, "you can not even re-distribute the binaries, > > >you must > > >distribute an installer", similar to what users have to do for the > > >non-free flash player or nvidia's non-

Bug#261257: ITP: folding -- Folding@home Client (install

2004-07-27 Thread sean finney
hi nick, On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:38:21PM -0400, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >i believe he means, "you can not even re-distribute the binaries, you > >must > >distribute an installer", similar to what users have to do for the > >non-free flash player or nvidia's non-free hardware acceleration > >bina

Bug#261257: ITP: folding -- Folding@home Client (install

2004-07-26 Thread Nick Lewycky
sean finney wrote: hi nick, On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 06:37:49PM -0400, Nick Lewycky wrote: >This packages is so non free that cannot even be included in the >non-free section without an installer. It's also only for i386. >dpkg will not be able to track its files. "without an installer"? This

Bug#261257: ITP: folding -- Folding@home Client (install package)

2004-07-26 Thread sean finney
hi nick, On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 06:37:49PM -0400, Nick Lewycky wrote: > >This packages is so non free that cannot even be included in the > >non-free section without an installer. It's also only for i386. > >dpkg will not be able to track its files. > > "without an installer"? This package *is*

Bug#261257: ITP: folding -- Folding@home Client (install package)

2004-07-26 Thread Nick Lewycky
Thiemo Seufer wrote: Nick Lewycky wrote: [snip] This packages is so non free that cannot even be included in the non-free section without an installer. It's also only for i386. dpkg will not be able to track its files. "without an installer"? This package *is* an installer! Then the package

Bug#261257: ITP: folding -- Folding@home Client (install package)

2004-07-26 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Nick Lewycky wrote: [snip] > >This packages is so non free that cannot even be included in the > >non-free section without an installer. It's also only for i386. > >dpkg will not be able to track its files. > > "without an installer"? This package *is* an installer! Then the package should probab

Bug#261257: ITP: folding -- Folding@home Client (install package)

2004-07-26 Thread Nick Lewycky
Guillem Jover wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 12:37:14PM -0400, Nick Lewycky wrote: * Package name: folding Version : 4.00 Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This field is missing. Sorry. That should be: Upstream Author : Vijay Pande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL

Bug#261257: ITP: folding -- Folding@home Client (install package)

2004-07-25 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 12:37:14PM -0400, Nick Lewycky wrote: > * Package name: folding > Version : 4.00 > Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This field is missing. > * URL : http://folding.stanford.edu/ > * License : No-redistribution. > Description

Bug#261257: ITP: folding -- Folding@home Client (install package)

2004-07-24 Thread Nick Lewycky
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: folding Version : 4.00 Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://folding.stanford.edu/ * License : No-redistribution. Description : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Client (install package) [EMAIL PROTECTED]