Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:48 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2004 22:07:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 18 15:07:16 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.58] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BxYaS-0000d1-00; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:07:16 -0700
Received: from andromeda (syr-24-59-54-124.twcny.rr.com [24.59.54.124])
        by ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
i7IM7Dt2013207;
        Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:07:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1BxYaO-0006sP-7d; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:07:12 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: netreg -- Network registration to provide a MAC to IP to username
 mapping
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:07:11 -0400
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_PACKAGE,
        X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : netreg
  Version         : Debian
  Upstream Author : Various
* URL             : southwestern, CMU, sourceforge, etc
* License         : GPL
  Description     : Network registration to provide a MAC to IP to username 
mapping

Hi all,

I'm interested in providing a network registration package for Debian.
There are various "upstream" implementations, and I'm not sure there's a
"right" one for Debian.  Its likely that a Debian-specific package is
appropriate.  This package would mostly be some perl glue which
Recommends: webserver, dhcpd.  For the various upstream versions, try
googling for "netreg site:edu".

By the way, I'm not in a position to implement this right now, so its a
long term project.  If someone else is in a better position than I, feel
free to hijack this.  Also, if you have access to the equipment
necessary to implement and test this, I'd be glad to offer my time.
Specifically, netreg depends on the ability to restrict network access
of unregistered hosts to the registration machine[s].

I think this is something that many would find very attrative were it
offered for Debian.  Imagine telling a school that they could
aptitude install netreg and have it scan student machines for the worm
of the week before allowing access.  And, hey, we can use samba to pop
up a MessageBox("You have a worm.  Your computer is quaranteened.
Please call IT at x6935.");

Cheers,
Justin

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 266738-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 23:17:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 16:17:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EIaK4-00011N-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:17:48 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EIaK4-0006mx-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:48 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:48 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the ITP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your ITP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the ITP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a body text like this:

reopen 266738
thanks bts

Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* ITPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.

A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to