On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:36:01PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
It was uploaded on 2004-12-09, to non-free. I plead guilty for not checking
wnpp (I usually do check. I don't recall why I didn't do it in this case).
Anyway, I certainly don't mind if someone else wants to take
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:36:01PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
It was uploaded on 2004-12-09, to non-free. I plead guilty for not checking
wnpp (I usually do check. I don't recall why I didn't do it in this case).
Anyway, I
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:54:04AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
retitle 282688 ITP: autoconf-doc -- Documentation for autoconf, automatic
configure script builder
owner 282688 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
I plan to be packaging autoconf-doc, probably in non-free, so it won't
have to be moved
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:54:04AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
retitle 282688 ITP: autoconf-doc -- Documentation for autoconf, automatic
configure script builder
owner 282688 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
I plan to be packaging
retitle 282688 ITP: autoconf-doc -- Documentation for autoconf, automatic
configure script builder
owner 282688 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
I plan to be packaging autoconf-doc, probably in non-free, so it won't
have to be moved there post-Sarge.
-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Since 2.59a-1 of autoconf, it does not have documentation anymore. Due
to the complexity of the packages, it would be really nice to have
documentation for autoconf in sarge.
I'm therefore requesting for this documentation to be packaged
separately. Note that
- Forwarded message from Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
From: Ben Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#282688: RFP: autoconf-doc -- Documentation for autoconf,
automatic configure script builder
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:22:04 -0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 09:04:15PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Note that since GFDL documents in main are acceptable for the Sarge
release, you may upload to main now. After sarge is released, however,
this package would probably need to be moved to non-free.
Since some disagree about
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Since 2.59a-1 of autoconf, it does not have documentation anymore.
Due to the complexity of the packages, it would be really nice to
have documentation for autoconf in sarge.
2.59a is a alpha/beta-type release that shouldn't be packaged in the
first place.
9 matches
Mail list logo
