Bug#286806: Why does serpentine need dbus?

2006-05-25 Thread Julien Valroff
Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 15:26 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit : > A serpentine package without dbus is surely preferable to no package at > all. I have just noticed that serpentine does not need any dbus binding! My message should have be sent to listen ITP (listen depends on serpentine) Sorry for th

Bug#286806: Why does serpentine need dbus?

2006-05-24 Thread Julien Valroff
Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 15:26 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit : > A serpentine package without dbus is surely preferable to no package at > all. Why not upload a package of serpentine without dbus > support? Sure, I will do this shortly > If you no longer want to maintain the package, I am willing to

Bug#286806: Why does serpentine need dbus?

2006-05-24 Thread Julien Valroff
Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 15:26 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit : > A serpentine package without dbus is surely preferable to no package at > all. Why not upload a package of serpentine without dbus > support? If you no longer want to maintain the package, I am willing to > do it. OK, python 2.3 support

Bug#286806: Why does serpentine need dbus?

2006-05-24 Thread Sam Morris
A serpentine package without dbus is surely preferable to no package at all. Why not upload a package of serpentine without dbus support? If you no longer want to maintain the package, I am willing to do it. -- Sam Morris http://robots.org.uk/ PGP key id 5EA01078 3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B