Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 15:26 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit :
> A serpentine package without dbus is surely preferable to no package at
> all.
I have just noticed that serpentine does not need any dbus binding!
My message should have be sent to listen ITP (listen depends on
serpentine)
Sorry for th
Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 15:26 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit :
> A serpentine package without dbus is surely preferable to no package at
> all. Why not upload a package of serpentine without dbus
> support?
Sure, I will do this shortly
> If you no longer want to maintain the package, I am willing to
Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 15:26 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit :
> A serpentine package without dbus is surely preferable to no package at
> all. Why not upload a package of serpentine without dbus
> support? If you no longer want to maintain the package, I am willing to
> do it.
OK, python 2.3 support
A serpentine package without dbus is surely preferable to no package at
all. Why not upload a package of serpentine without dbus
support? If you no longer want to maintain the package, I am willing to
do it.
--
Sam Morris
http://robots.org.uk/
PGP key id 5EA01078
3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B
4 matches
Mail list logo