Bug#298381: progress

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:15:35PM +0100, Mirco Bauer wrote: Hi, > > I'm interested in LAT in principle, but don't think it's ready to enter > > debian > > ATM, while it misses SSL/TLS connection support, which I think is a really > > important feature for a remote ldap manager... > > I agree w

Bug#298381: progress

On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 14:36 +0100, Guido Trotter wrote: > I'm interested in LAT in principle, but don't think it's ready to enter debian > ATM, while it misses SSL/TLS connection support, which I think is a really > important feature for a remote ldap manager... I agree with you, after I tested LA

Bug#298381: progress

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:06:48PM +0100, Mirco Bauer wrote: Hi, > Are you still working on the package? > If not, I would package and maintain LAT, because I need it for my daily > work :) > I'm interested in LAT in principle, but don't think it's ready to enter debian ATM, while it misses SSL

Bug#298381: progress

Are you still working on the package? If not, I would package and maintain LAT, because I need it for my daily work :) -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL+