Hey Otavio,
Otavio Salvador wrote:
>Kel Modderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>>Otavio, I did some more thinking about the recent revamp of the rules,
>>and i'd like to propose a small optimisation.
>>
>>
>
>I agree with all this patch. Only one optimisation: you don't need to
>use cl
Kel Modderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio, I did some more thinking about the recent revamp of the rules,
> and i'd like to propose a small optimisation.
I agree with all this patch. Only one optimisation: you don't need to
use clean target since cdbs already clean all contents of debian
Kel Modderman([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-09-25 20:56:
> Hi all,
>
> This of course not a critical change and i doubt we'll be releasing
> another revision until new upstream source is available, but I'd like to
> hear some opinions before I commit this patch to svn.
>
> Thanks, Kel.
No problem
Hi all,
Stephen Birch wrote:
>Hi Guys
>
>Just to bring you all up to date. We have been using SVN on
>svn.debian.org to coordinate the package and will be maintaining it as
>a team using Alioth at:
>
>https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-spca5xx/
>
>If you wish you can check out the source from
Hi Guys
Just to bring you all up to date. We have been using SVN on
svn.debian.org to coordinate the package and will be maintaining it as
a team using Alioth at:
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-spca5xx/
If you wish you can check out the source from
svn+alioth://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-spc
Do you have any experience with hotplug and dbus? It would be cool if we could
tie this all together so when a camera is plugged in an appropriate
application pops up.
Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folks,
We are on our way.
> Your project registration for Alioth has been approved.
>
> Project Full Name: Debian packaging of spca5xx drivers
> Project Unix Name: pkg-spca5xx
> CVS Server: cvs.pkg-spca5xx.alioth.debian.org
> Shell/Web Server: pkg-spca5xx.alioth.debian.org
>
> Your D
Kel Modderman([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-09-23 04:16:
> Sounds like a crap idea to me. I don't care whether my particular
> package has never had contact with the official debian distribution
> before. I've tried my best to improve on my package with each release
> and adhere to the strict debian poli
Otavio Salvador([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-09-22 14:36:
> Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You propose hijacking the package! Why on earth would you do
> > that? I am playing very much by the rules.
>
> Well, first time I ping you is more then a mounth ago. You had a lot
> of ti
Kel Modderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, to cut the story short, I don't want to have another bad
> experience, so just put the project into svn on Alioth. Let everybody
> look at it, propose some items that could be improved or worked on and
> discuss what actually needs to be done and
Hi,
By the time I saw this, there were a volley of replies to this first
attempt at contact.
Stephen Birch wrote:
>Hi Kel and Itay
>
>One of the packages I have been planning for Debian is the spca5xx
>package for which I filed a ITP some time back. Since I believed my
>NM application was short
Okay .. I have looked over both packages and the kanotix one is
slightly more polished of the two IMHO. They are both good :-)
I copied the code to here and can set up a SVN repos tomorrow as required.
http://imsmail.org/spca5xx
I have not used Alioth before but have taken your suggestion and
re
Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay .. I have looked over both packages and the kanotix one is
> slightly more polished of the two IMHO. They are both good :-)
Ok.
> I copied the code to here and can set up a SVN repos tomorrow as required.
>
> http://imsmail.org/spca5xx
Will look
Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You propose hijacking the package! Why on earth would you do
> that? I am playing very much by the rules.
Well, first time I ping you is more then a mounth ago. You had a lot
of time to work on it and didn't.
This is clear since you asked to take
Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It so happens that one of my other packages containing a new upstream
> release is still stuck waiting for the sponsor to get around to
> uploading. There is no way I wanted to repeat that experience.
Well, there's a http://sponsors.debian.net service
Otavio Salvador([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-09-22 11:01:
> I think you should be the maintainer of it. Also, I think this kinda
WTF
Now I am stunned.
1. My reasons for not wishing to use a sponsor are valid.
2. It was quite reasonable to expect that my NM would complete soon and so
the anticipated
Hi Itay (and other interested folks)
Itay Ben-Yaacov([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-09-22 06:50:
> Of course I have no problem of you taking my package and building upon it, or
> of being
> co-maintainer. On the other hand, I do not understand why you wish to remove
> changelog entries,
> and do not g
Dear Stephen and everyone else,
Of course I have no problem of you taking my package and building upon it, or
of being
co-maintainer. On the other hand, I do not understand why you wish to remove
changelog entries,
and do not give you my permission to do so.
You may of course receieve such per
Itay Ben-Yaacov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear Stephen and everyone else,
Hello,
> Of course I have no problem of you taking my package and building upon it, or
> of being
> co-maintainer. On the other hand, I do not understand why you wish to remove
> changelog entries,
> and do not give
Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rechecking the ITP I noticed that Itay Ben-Yaacov pointed out that you
> guys both have a package already complete. There is no point in
> reinventing the wheel so Id like to use your work.
I agree about this.
I think this can be co-maintained and may
Hi Kel and Itay
One of the packages I have been planning for Debian is the spca5xx
package for which I filed a ITP some time back. Since I believed my
NM application was shortly to be completed I decided to not use my
normal sponsor for this package preferring to wait until I could do my
own upl
21 matches
Mail list logo
