On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 20:40:09 -0400, Glenn Maynard uttered
> Peter's complaint is a legitimate and important one--it really is a terrible
> package name--so please don't dismiss it. Package names are a shared
> namespace, and must be chosen intelligently.
>
I concur. When I built this program loca
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:33:06AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Peter Samuelson in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > * Package name: connect
> > > Version : 1.93
> >
> > That's a terrible package name. What will the GNUSTEP people do if
> > they ever want to package something that man
Re: Peter Samuelson in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * Package name: connect
> > Version : 1.93
>
> That's a terrible package name. What will the GNUSTEP people do if
> they ever want to package something that manages SMB client mounts?
That's what upstream calls the program (actually co
[Philippe COVAL]
> * Package name: connect
> Version : 1.93
That's a terrible package name. What will the GNUSTEP people do if
they ever want to package something that manages SMB client mounts?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philippe COVAL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: connect
Version : 1.93
Upstream Author : Shun-ichi GOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.taiyo.co.jp/~gotoh/ssh/connect.html
* License : GPL 2
Description : E
5 matches
Mail list logo
