Bug#315791: ITP: bmp-extra-plugins -- A set of BMP plugins ported from XMMS but not included in the main BMP or XMMS sources

2005-11-04 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Mathias Weyland in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: bmp-extra-plugins > Version : 6180 > Upstream Author : Artur Frysiak > * URL : http://svn.pld-linux.org/svn/bmp-plugins/trunk/ > * License : GPLv2, LGPL > Description : A

Bug#315791: ITP: bmp-extra-plugins -- A set of BMP plugins ported from XMMS but not included in the main BMP or XMMS sources

2005-10-03 Thread Mathias Weyland
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:06:40AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: Hi > When I merged this bug with my very old ITP, I intended that to mean I > was abdicating / abandoning mine. I realise now that this might not > have been clear. Mathias, please go ahead with your packaging. (: I finished the

Bug#315791: ITP: bmp-extra-plugins -- A set of BMP plugins ported from XMMS but not included in the main BMP or XMMS sources

2005-07-19 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Mathias Weyland] > The files in the musepack directory are licensed under the LGPL as > described in README. The original musepack plugins is also licensed > under the LGPL, so I don't think this is a problem. OK. I just wanted to make sure you were aware of the licensing problems I saw before.

Bug#315791: ITP: bmp-extra-plugins -- A set of BMP plugins ported from XMMS but not included in the main BMP or XMMS sources

2005-07-13 Thread Mathias Weyland
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 03:39:01PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > When I ITP'd this over a year ago (#234291), it turned out that a lot > of source files had no license notices. I note that this is still > true: see for example input/musepack/bitstream.c. The files in the musepack directory are

Bug#315791: ITP: bmp-extra-plugins -- A set of BMP plugins ported from XMMS but not included in the main BMP or XMMS sources

2005-07-04 Thread Peter Samuelson
merge 234291 234361 315791 thanks [Mathias Weyland] > * URL : http://svn.pld-linux.org/svn/bmp-plugins/trunk/ > * License : GPLv2, LGPL > Description : A set of BMP plugins When I ITP'd this over a year ago (#234291), it turned out that a lot of source files had no lice

Processed: Re: Bug#315791: ITP: bmp-extra-plugins -- A set of BMP plugins ported from XMMS but not included in the main BMP or XMMS sources

2005-07-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
set of BMP plugins ported from XMMS but not included in the main BMP or XMMS sources Merged 234291 234361 315791. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Bug#315791: ITP: bmp-extra-plugins -- A set of BMP plugins ported from XMMS but not included in the main BMP or XMMS sources

2005-06-26 Thread Mathias Weyland
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: Hi Eduard > Nice. Please consider adding the docklet plugin as well. Notice that all the plugins I mentioned above are coming from one svn trunk. This means that one source package will generate a lot of binary packages (one for each

Bug#315791: ITP: bmp-extra-plugins -- A set of BMP plugins ported from XMMS but not included in the main BMP or XMMS sources

2005-06-26 Thread Eduard Bloch
Moin Mathias! Mathias Weyland schrieb am Sonntag, den 26. Juni 2005: > * Package name: bmp-extra-plugins > Version : 6180 > Upstream Author : Artur Frysiak > * URL : http://svn.pld-linux.org/svn/bmp-plugins/trunk/ > * License : GPLv2, LGPL > Description :

Bug#315791: ITP: bmp-extra-plugins -- A set of BMP plugins ported from XMMS but not included in the main BMP or XMMS sources

2005-06-25 Thread Mathias Weyland
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: bmp-extra-plugins Version : 6180 Upstream Author : Artur Frysiak * URL : http://svn.pld-linux.org/svn/bmp-plugins/trunk/ * License : GPLv2, LGPL Description : A set of BMP plugins bmp-extra-plugins contain