Bug#338077: sword-text-kjv - King James Version and Royal Letters Patent

2005-11-11 Thread MJ Ray
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/05/msg00108.html > > I don't see a conclusive answer in that discussion; only doubt and > "didn't find any proof that this restriction still holds". I'd prefer > if we could find a specific abrogation of the rest

Bug#338077: sword-text-kjv - King James Version and Royal Letters Patent

2005-11-10 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 10:24:04AM +, MJ Ray wrote: > debian-legal has reviewed this topic before. You can read it in > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/05/msg00108.html Some of > the links there have rotted, but it seemed clearly not Crown > copyright. I don't see a conclusive answe

Bug#338077: sword-text-kjv - King James Version and Royal Letters Patent

2005-11-10 Thread MJ Ray
debian-legal has reviewed this topic before. You can read it in http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/05/msg00108.html Some of the links there have rotted, but it seemed clearly not Crown copyright. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Version_of_the_Bible Wikipedia asserts that the KJV is