Processed: Re: Bug#339009: O: lua50 -- Lua 5.0.2

2006-03-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 339009 O: lua50 -- Lua 5.0.2 Bug#339009: ITA: lua50 -- Lua 5.0.2 Changed Bug title. > noowner 339009 Bug#339009: O: lua50 -- Lua 5.0.2 Removed annotation that Bug was owned by David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. >

Bug#339009: O: lua50 -- Lua 5.0.2

2006-03-29 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 339009 O: lua50 -- Lua 5.0.2 noowner 339009 thanks On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 14:01:58 -0400, David Moreno Garza wrote: > Matej Vela wrote: >> >> Do you still intend to adopt lua50? (This is just a ping, I'm not >> >> interested in adopting it myself.) [...] > No. Okay, retitling. Thanks!

Processed: Re: Bug#339009: O: lua50 -- Lua 5.0.2

2005-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 339009 ITA: lua50 -- Lua 5.0.2 Bug#339009: O: lua50 -- Lua 5.0.2 Changed Bug title. > owner 339009 ! Bug#339009: ITA: lua50 -- Lua 5.0.2 Owner recorded as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#339009: O: lua50 -- Lua 5.0.2

2005-11-14 Thread damog
retitle 339009 ITA: lua50 -- Lua 5.0.2 owner 339009 ! thanks On 14:00 Mon 14 Nov 2005, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > I have no time to continue looking after the Lua packages. They have > languished > unloved now for some time and have a few open bugs against them, at least one > of which is seriou

Bug#339009: O: lua50 -- Lua 5.0.2

2005-11-14 Thread Daniel Silverstone
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2005-11-14 Severity: normal I have no time to continue looking after the Lua packages. They have languished unloved now for some time and have a few open bugs against them, at least one of which is serious (a rebuild is needed against readline 5) I am so busy